Skip to main content
Home
Home

Main navigation 2

  • Events
    An oil pump works next to wind turbines in a field.
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, Dec. 13, 2023 | 8 am - 10 am
    Oil Market Update and Prospects for 2024 See Details
    Delange banner
    Center for Health and Biosciences | Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Feb. 09 - Sat, Feb. 10, 2024 | 8 am - 8 pm
    Brave New Worlds — Who Decides? Research, Risk, and Responsibility See Details
  • Experts
  • Divisions
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

Policy Support for Biochar: Review and Recommendations

December 21, 2018 | Ghasideh Pourhashem, Shih Yu (Elsie) Hung, Kenneth B. Medlock III, Caroline A. Masiello
A coal power plant.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Shih Yu (Elsie) Hung
Research Manager, Center for Energy Studies
Kenneth B. Medlock III
James A. Baker, III, and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics | Senior Director, Center for Energy Studies
Caroline A. Masiello
Baker Institute Rice Faculty Scholar | Professor of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Chemistry, and Biosciences

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteBiochar

Abstract

Significant evidence has accumulated demonstrating that soil biochar amendment has many environmental benefits; however, adoption has been slow. This raises the question of how to align the environmental benefits with commercial motivations to drive more widespread implementation. Here, we examine the role that government policy can play in accelerating production and use at commercial scale. We identify three types of programs that can support biochar production: commercial financial incentives, nonfinancial policy support, and research and development funding. We also describe how these programs are currently used to support biochar production. For example, financial incentives can motivate immediate changes in business practices while nonfinancial policies can be important mechanisms to educate consumers and expand market demand. Research and development support can provide the necessary funding for early-stage innovations that may one day become commercially viable options, even without other types of policy support. There are different risk–reward profiles for each policy mechanism, and these must be considered when evaluating a policy direction. Finally, we offer broad recommendations to the development of policy that maximizes the net benefits of biochar adoption. Key recommendations include improving policies that allow for the monetization of environmental benefits and avoided costs, recognizing soil as a resource through national preservation policy, and developing a broadly accepted set of product standards for biochar.

Read the full article in GCB Bioenergy.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12582
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

gas industry graph
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

OPEC+ Agrees to Additional Production Cuts: Market Responds With a Shrug

Read More
US map electricity
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Approaching a Tipping Point for the Electric Grid

Read More
Oil and gas
Center for Energy Studies | Report

US Cannot Meet Its Paris Commitments Through Energy Alone

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy