Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Pandemics, the Economy, Nature and the Energy Sector

February 18, 2021 | Ted Temzelides

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Ted Temzelides.
Ted Temzelides
Baker Institute Rice Faculty Scholar | George and Cynthia Mitchell Professor in Sustainable Development
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Temezelides, Ted. 2021. Pandemics, the Economy, Nature, and the Energy Sector. Policy brief: Recommendations for the New Administration. 02.18.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

This brief is part of a series of policy recommendations for the administration of President Joe Biden. Focusing on a range of important issues facing the country, the briefs are intended to provide decision-makers with relevant and effective ideas for addressing domestic and foreign policy priorities. View the entire series at www.bakerinstitute.org/recommendations-2021.

 

This brief discusses the connections between pandemics, the economy, and energy, with an emphasis on how pandemic prevention can benefit the energy sector. Energy and the economy are intertwined. Economic growth requires reliable access to a vast amount of energy, and the 1970s recession stands witness to how the world economy can suffer when energy supply is disrupted. At the same time, a downturn in economic activity affects energy markets. With the U.S. increasingly becoming a net energy producer, declining economic activity can have strong adverse effects on the energy sector. Currently, the world economy is experiencing a severe “adverse shock” due to COVID-19. Pandemics begin as health crises, but soon affect the entire economy, including the energy sector. An energy sector that lacks resilience or is otherwise unhealthy is not able to support robust economic activity. Thus, economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic would need to consider energy sector resilience.

COVID-19 has been a major event, estimated to result in close to 500,000 fatalities over a period of almost a year in the U.S. alone. While the impact of this tragic loss in human life cannot be understated, it is also important to note that the pandemic is likely to cost the global economy well over $1 trillion in 2020 alone. Such a large reduction in economic activity will inevitably lead to less capital available for important investments, including those necessary to ensure resilience in the energy sector. The infrastructure investments needed to expand and scale up renewable, energy storage, and carbon-negative technologies are immense. As a result, the transition toward a green energy economy cannot realistically take place before the world economy fully recovers from the pandemic.

It is virtually impossible to prevent a pandemic from reaching our shores once it occurs. How then can we make a pandemic-capable virus less likely to emerge? And in the event that a pandemic does emerge, what is the best way to facilitate recovery after the pandemic?

Pandemic Prevention

COVID-19 is far from an isolated event; for the last century, two new viruses per year have spilled from their natural hosts into humans. Tropical forests around the world re breeding grounds for a large number of viruses. Viruses can infect people directly when handling live wildlife or their meat (as in wildlife food markets), or indirectly from exposure to farm animals. Several studies have documented that the costs of pandemic prevention through planning and the reduction of deforestation and trade in wildlife are only a small fraction of the costs from dealing with a global pandemic like COVID-19 (see Figure 1).1 Institutional reforms are needed to deliver a sustainable growth that would reduce the chances of a similar health-driven economic breakdown in the future. The risks today are higher than ever, as increasing interactions between humans and wildlife and advances in mobility accelerate the potential for viruses to spread globally. Figure 1 identifies several factors that would contribute to a reduced pandemic frequency at a tiny fraction of the cost of a pandemic of the magnitude of COVID-19.

Figure 1 — Annual Costs of Preventing Future Pandemics from Wildlife are Tiny Compared with Costs of the COVID-19 Crisis

ANNUAL COSTS OF PREVENTING FUTURE PANDEMICS FROM WILDLIFE ARE TINY COMPARED WITH COSTS OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS
Source  Dobson et al., Science 2020. Guardian graphic.

 

Tropical forest edges have been shown to be critical for pandemic emergence. They arise as humans build roads or clear forests for timber production or agriculture, reducing the natural environment and bringing humans into closer contact with previously isolated wildlife.2 The largest-scale example of successful deforestation reduction came from Brazil between 2005- 2012 when deforestation in the Amazon dropped by 70%. This was partly the result of international contributions to an Amazon Fund of about $1 billion supporting land-use zoning. Such actions contribute to preserving biodiversity and mitigating climate change.3

Establishing policies and making investments to prevent tropical deforestation and to limit wildlife trade would unequivocally help to delay the next outbreak. Most of the proposed measures have other environmental and climate-related co-benefits. For example, reduced deforestation would also lead to additional carbon absorption from the atmosphere, contributing to the fight against climate change. A global agency to promote prevention, conduct surveillance, and, if all else fails, sound the alarm, would almost certainly reduce disease emergence risk and save lives.

While imperfect and in need of reform, the World Health Organization (WHO) would be the natural fit for this role. By their very nature pandemics constitute global threats, requiring a coordinated, multilateral response. A nativist approach is likely to harm countries like the U.S. in their interests as well as in the physical toll of lost lives. Pandemic prevention is an area where the world is likely to welcome engagement from the Biden administration.

There are strong parallels between a coordinated U.S.-led action against pandemics and the role the U.S. can play in leading multilateral engagement on climate and energy issues. The return of the U.S. to the Paris accord serves as a strong signal to other nations about America’s commitment to a viable energy transition. A U.S. policy that includes a price on carbon, and is mindful of market incentives, is likely to prove credible and effective, making it more likely to result in global coordinated action. This is especially true in terms of inducing powerful major carbon-emitters, such as India and China, to join meaningful multilateral climate action.

Policy During the Recovery

The United Nations (UNCTAD) March 2020 report forecasted that the COVID-19 shock would trigger a deceleration of global annual growth, with a loss to global income around $1 trillion–$2 trillion.4 If the extraordinary economic stimulus measures coupled with the upcoming vaccines are successful, we could witness a swift recovery, as in the aftermath of the SARS virus in 2003. If, however, the crisis is prolonged, the recovery could lag, as in the period following the oil shocks of the 1970s. When the crisis begins to subside, fundamentals point to a global economic situation more closely resembling a post-World War II recovery than that of a financial crisis. Here again we turn to one of the largest lessons of the pandemic: the necessity of international coordination.

An important aspect of this recovery involves assistance for non-OECD countries that lack the infrastructure or resources to handle a health/economic crisis on their own. As a response to the pandemic, special provisions for fast-track financing are currently allowing World Bank projects totaling $1.9 billion to get underway in 25 countries. There are also plans for a broader medium-term economic response that will provide up to $160 billion over the next 15 months. What will likely prove necessary is a combination of monetary transfers to developing countries (in a Marshall-like plan) and technology transfers and debt relief until economic growth returns. These transfers are best targeted toward projects that improve infrastructure, including projects that ensure sustainable energy supplies. Over 1.3 billion people, mainly in rural areas in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, still lack reliable access to electricity. This has direct implications for living standards and life expectancy in these regions, due to the resulting difficulties in purifying water, storing food and essential medicines, and accessing basic-level health care. Population trends are likely to make energy poverty an even more pressing issue in the future. Electrification in these areas is a major undertaking that requires coordinated engagement.

Financing stimulus policies similar to those applied in OECD countries will be especially challenging for Africa.5 Here too the new administration has the opportunity to play a strategic role that could increase for decades the geopolitical influence of the U.S. in some of the world’s most critical regions. This strategic opening will not remain for long as other countries, most notably China, stand ready to step in.

Conclusion

Pandemics are detrimental to public health, as well as to the health of the economy and the energy sector. The realization that pandemics are not black swan events ought to lead to better responses in the future. It is clear that coordinated, multilateral engagement by the U.S. is critical to both prevention and recovery. No country alone is immune or singlehandedly capable of solving the problem. Even within the U.S., interstate coordination and a federal government approach better place states to focus on relief rather than competition for resources. Policies that reduce the probability of future pandemic emergence involve some costs, but constitute a most profitable investment. Some of these policies, such as reducing deforestation, also have auxiliary benefits, including in the fight against climate change.

Endnotes

1. Andrew P. Dobson, et al., “Ecology and Economics for Pandemic Prevention,” Science, July 24, 2020. DOI: 10.1126/science. abc3189. A related follow-up study appears in Aaron Bernstein, et al., “Investments in the Primary Prevention of Viral Zoonoses,” Manuscript, 2020. See also “Cost of preventing next pandemic 'equal to just 2% of Covid-19 economic damage,’” The Guardian, July 23, 2020, https://www. theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/23/ preventing-next-pandemic-fraction-costcovid-19-economic-fallout.

2. See M.C. Castro, et al., “Development, environmental degradation, and disease spread in the Brazilian Amazon,” PLoS Biology 17(11): e3000526.

3. See T. Vilela, et. al, “A better Amazon road network for people and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” 2020, https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1910853117.

4. See UNCTAD, “The coronavirus shock: a story of another global crisis foretold and what policymakers should be doing about it,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Report Update, March 2020.

5. See Norman V. Loayza and Steven Michael Pennings, “Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries,” Research and Policy Briefs, no. 28 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, Spring 2020)

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/89CH-H611
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Gas+Stove
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

Why Gas Stoves Matter to the Climate — and the Gas Industry: Keeping Them Means Homes Will Use Gas for Heating Too

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy