Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    USMCA Flags
    Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico
    Thu, July 09, 2026 | 10 am - 11 am
    The State of Negotiations of the USMCA See Details
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Working Paper

Losing Hormuz: The Costs of War for Gulf Oil Exporters

April 8, 2026 | Jim Krane, Justin Alexander
Oil ship in sea, Strait of Hormuz.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Jim Krane

Diana Tamari Sabbagh Fellow in Middle East Energy Studies | CES Lead, Energy and Geopolitics in the Middle East | Codirector, Middle East Energy Roundtable

Justin Alexander

Nonresident Fellow

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Jim Krane and Justin Alexander, “Losing Hormuz: The Costs of War for Gulf Oil Exporters,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, April 8, 2026, https://doi.org/10.25613/TKP5-JF69. 

    Copy Citation

Tags

Middle EastIranWarPersian GulfGCC (Gulf Cooperation Council)Oil and gasOil exportsPipelines

Economic Impacts of Strait of Hormuz Closure

The first month of the Iran war following US-Israeli strikes on the country has resulted in serious damage on the economies of Iran’s Arab neighbors in the Persian Gulf, where initial export losses averaged nearly $2 billion per day. The harm was unevenly distributed, however. In at least one oil and gas exporter, government revenues registered a sharp increase. For the wider region, war-driven closure of the Strait of Hormuz has demonstrated the region’s acute economic and physical vulnerability, as well as the risk exposures and costs faced by importers dependent on resources traversing the contested maritime chokepoint.

In normal times, the Strait of Hormuz channels about 20% of global oil exports, with about 15 million barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil shipments and roughly 5 mbd of refined products exports. The strait also handles about 20% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes, roughly 86 million tonnes per annum (MTPA).

The strait was all but closed for the entire month of March 2026. Just a trickle of oil and products — mainly Iran’s — traversed the narrow passage. By month’s end, workarounds allowed just over a third of the normal oil flows, or 7.5 mbd, to reach oil markets through a small but critical network of bypass pipelines and from Iranian cargoes that continued to use the strait. Meanwhile, the closure left nearly two thirds of the normal exports of Gulf oil blockaded inside the strait, with oil production in most countries being shut-in due to dwindling options for storage.

Overall, the oil market outage from the war against Iran is unprecedented, the largest in history. But not all Gulf exporters faced dire effects. One, Oman, has been earning windfall profits due to its near-total lack of export exposure to Hormuz, since most of its territory and all its export infrastructure lie outside the Gulf. Iranian exports, too, were up slightly, despite withstanding thousands of US-Israeli attacks. For others still able to reach export markets, albeit in a reduced way, the effects were mixed. The most detrimental effects fell upon Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain, with no ability to export via the strait, and no workarounds.

View the full paper (PDF).

 

This publication was produced by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. It has not been through editorial review. Wherever feasible, the material was reviewed by outside experts prior to release. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author(s).

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2026 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/TKP5-JF69
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
 A man unloads humanitarian aid supplied by the U.N. refugee agency UNHCR at a school in Beirut used as a shelter for people displaced by Israeli airstrikes.
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Commentary

Refugee Numbers Dropped in 2025 — But Aid Cuts and Other Trends Suggest Little to Celebrate

Read More
EMEC1
Center for Energy Studies | Press Release

Rice’s Baker Institute launches Eastern Mediterranean Energy Center with US Department of Energy

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy