Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    USMCA Flags
    Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico
    Thu, July 09, 2026 | 10 am - 11 am
    The State of Negotiations of the USMCA See Details
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

What Can We Learn About Energy Access and Demand from Mobile-phone Surveys? Nine Findings From Twelve African Countries

February 20, 2018 | Ben Leo, Jared Kalow, Todd Moss
Woman looking at phone

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Ben Leo

Visiting Fellow, Center for Global Development

Jared Kalow

Research Assistant, Center for Global Development

Todd Moss

Nonresident Fellow

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteAfricaElectricityEnergy supply

Abstract

This paper leverages the proliferation of mobile phones in Sub-Saharan Africa to conduct phone-based surveys on energy access and demand. The survey uses interactive voice recognition (IVR) surveys to ask questions on energy service provision, service quality, and demand in twelve African countries: Benin, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. From these surveys, this we identify nine key findings:

  1. Daily outages are a norm almost everywhere.
  2. Satisfaction with service from the grid varies widely.
  3. The grid is viewed as reliable for powering some household appliances.
  4. In all countries, the majority desire a grid connection.
  5. Connection costs and distance from the grid are the most common obstacles to grid electricity.
  6. Demand is high for energy-intensive appliances, especially TVs.
  7. On-grid customers still rely heavily on generators, especially in Nigeria.
  8. Off-grid, non-generator electricity is inadequate for most respondents’ energy needs.
  9. Off-grid customers still desire grid electricity.

From these findings, we draw several potential policy implications. First, both grid electricity and off-grid solutions currently are inadequate to meet many African consumers’ modern energy demands. Second, grid and off-grid electricity are viewed by consumers as complementary, rather than competing, solutions to meet energy demand. Third, a market exists for off-grid solutions even among connected, urban Africans.

Read the full paper at Center for Global Development.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
EMEC1
Center for Energy Studies | Press Release

Rice’s Baker Institute launches Eastern Mediterranean Energy Center with US Department of Energy

Read More
Oil Field. Winter industrial landscape with an oil pump and torch in the background.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

How Declining Oil Production Could Weaken Russia’s Geopolitical Power

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy