Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Map of the Middle East
    Wed, June 10, 2026 | 5 pm - 6:45 pm
    The Middle East and US Foreign Policy: What Happens Next? See Details
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health Policy | Biomedical Research | Journal

The Aging of Biomedical Research in the United States

December 28, 2011 | Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Vivian Ho
A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Vivian Ho

James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

To access the full article, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

By Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Kara M. Calhoun, Nathan Lo and Vivian Ho

Abstract

In the past 30 years, the average age of biomedical researchers has steadily increased. The average age of an investigator at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) rose from 39 to 51 between 1980 and 2008. The aging of the biomedical workforce was even more apparent when looking at first-time NIH grantees. The average age of a new investigator was 42 in 2008, compared to 36 in 1980. To determine if the rising barriers at NIH for entry in biomedical research might impact innovative ideas and research, we analyzed the research and publications of Nobel Prize winners from 1980 to 2010 to assess the age at which their pioneering research occurred. We established that in the 30-year period, 96 scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine or chemistry for work related to biomedicine, and that their groundbreaking research was conducted at an average age of 41—one year younger than the average age of a new investigator at NIH. Furthermore, 78% of the Nobel Prize winners conducted their research before the age of 51, the average age of an NIH principal investigator. This suggested that limited access to NIH might inhibit research potential and novel projects, and could impact biomedicine and the next generation scientists in the United States.

Read the full article in PLoS ONE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029738
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Family building atoms model
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How Science Misinformation Affects Parenting and Child Health

Read More
Student walking toward school bus
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How School Safety Policies Affect Student Well-Being

Read More
health + money + statistics
Health Economics | Center for Health Policy | Report

Texas Universities Show Sharp Differences in Health Insurance Premiums

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy