Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Advancing US-UK Scientific Collaboration With Angela McLean See Details
    People walking street
    Center for Tax and Budget Policy
    Wed, Sep. 09, 2026 | 8:30 am - 4 pm
    The Age of Depopulation: Growth, Prosperity, and a Shrinking Population See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health Policy | Biomedical Research | Journal

The Aging of Biomedical Research in the United States

December 28, 2011 | Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Vivian Ho
A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Senior Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Vivian Ho

James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

To access the full article, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

By Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Kara M. Calhoun, Nathan Lo and Vivian Ho

Abstract

In the past 30 years, the average age of biomedical researchers has steadily increased. The average age of an investigator at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) rose from 39 to 51 between 1980 and 2008. The aging of the biomedical workforce was even more apparent when looking at first-time NIH grantees. The average age of a new investigator was 42 in 2008, compared to 36 in 1980. To determine if the rising barriers at NIH for entry in biomedical research might impact innovative ideas and research, we analyzed the research and publications of Nobel Prize winners from 1980 to 2010 to assess the age at which their pioneering research occurred. We established that in the 30-year period, 96 scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine or chemistry for work related to biomedicine, and that their groundbreaking research was conducted at an average age of 41—one year younger than the average age of a new investigator at NIH. Furthermore, 78% of the Nobel Prize winners conducted their research before the age of 51, the average age of an NIH principal investigator. This suggested that limited access to NIH might inhibit research potential and novel projects, and could impact biomedicine and the next generation scientists in the United States.

Read the full article in PLoS ONE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029738
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Medical workers working in conference room.
Center for Health Policy | Health Economics | Issue Brief

The Growing Gap Between Hospital CEO and Direct Care Pay

Read More
Artificial intelligence concept.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How Artificial Intelligence Affects Childhood Development

Read More
Flooded cars on the street of the city.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

What FEMA’s New Flood Maps Mean for Houston Schools

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy