Shale Renders the ‘Obsolescing Bargain’ Obsolete: Political Risk and Foreign Investment in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Gabriel Collins
Baker Botts Fellow in Energy and Environmental Regulatory Affairs | CES Lead, Energy and Geopolitics in EurasiaMark P. Jones
Fellow in Political Science | CES Lead, Argentina | Joseph D. Jamail Chair in Latin American StudiesJim Krane
Diana Tamari Sabbagh Fellow in Middle East Energy Studies | CES Lead, Energy and Geopolitics in the Middle East | Codirector, Middle East Energy Roundtable
Kenneth B. Medlock III
James A. Baker. III and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics | CES Senior DirectorFrancisco J. Monaldi
Wallace S. Wilson Fellow in Latin American Energy Policy | Director, Latin America Energy ProgramAbstract
Argentina is a risky place for foreign investors, with frequent political swings from right to left, weak enforcement of contracts and property rights, endemic corruption, combative unions and a volatile macroeconomic environment. And yet, between 2013 and 2019 IOCs invested $13 billion in developing oil and gas concessions in Argentina. However in contrast to past investments, which were in conventional developments, these recent investments have been almost exclusively in unconventional developments in the Vaca Muerta shale play. We hypothesize tight oil and shale gas extraction is exposed to fewer expropriation risks than conventional oil and gas, and as a result, Argentina is likely to attract more investment in the Vaca Muerta formation than would otherwise be realized given its troubled history. Moreover, while we focus on Argentina, the case may have implications for the global oil market. If risk is institutionally and structurally lower in shale investments, this realization could encourage wider proliferation of shale production outside the United States.
Read the full article in Resources Policy.