Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Why Governments Need Science Advice With Angela McLean See Details
    Green energy Concept
    Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Aug. 20, 2026 | 7 am - 5 pm
    3rd Annual Conference: Energy, Technology, and Grid Resilience See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health Policy | Biomedical Research | Journal

NTD Policy Priorities: Science, Values, and Agenda Setting

May 18, 2017 | Ana S. Iltis, Kirstin R.W. Matthews
Scientist holding a vial

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Ana S. Iltis

Nonresident Fellow for Biomedical Research Policy

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Senior Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteDisease and infectionsVaccines

Introduction

Efficient and effective implementation of strategies to combat neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), the cycle of poverty, and the political instability they perpetuate requires cogent public policy. Developing cogent NTD policy requires a clear agenda and set of priorities. Policymakers in local, regional, national, and international settings can set agendas and priorities independently, or they can collaborate with multiple stakeholders to determine the best way to develop effective NTD policy. Lack of coordination may mean that no priorities are adequately resourced or some areas are overemphasized for non-scientifically valid political reasons. NTD scientists and physicians should acknowledge the need for priorities and participate in policy development alongside public health experts and community representatives to increase the likelihood that NTD policies will be effective, efficient, and sustainable. In this article, we highlight value judgments relevant at the agenda-setting stage of the NTD policy process and describe why NTD researchers and physicians ought to participate in this process.

Read the full article in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005431
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Infant or newborn baby feet with pulse oximeter for determine oxygen saturation in baby's blood, in incubator at intensive room care in the hospital after delivery.
Center for Health Policy | Science and Technology Policy | Report

Building a Framework for Artificial Womb Technology Clinical Trials

Read More
Medical workers working in conference room.
Center for Health Policy | Health Economics | Issue Brief

The Growing Gap Between Hospital CEO and Direct Care Pay

Read More
Artificial intelligence concept.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How Artificial Intelligence Affects Childhood Development

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy