Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Advancing US-UK Scientific Collaboration With Angela McLean See Details
    People walking street
    Center for Tax and Budget Policy
    Wed, Sep. 09, 2026 | 8:30 am - 4 pm
    The Age of Depopulation: Growth, Prosperity, and a Shrinking Population See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health Policy | Biomedical Research | Journal

Gene Patents, Patenting Life and the Impact of Court Rulings on U.S. Stem Cell Patents and Research

April 22, 2014 | Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Maude Cuchiara
Blue stem cell under microscope

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Senior Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Maude Cuchiara

Nonresident Scholar

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

health careGeneticsBiotechnologyCancergeneticsPatents

Abstract

In June 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring genes were unpatentable in the case Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. Up until this decision, Myriad Genetics was the only company in the US that could legally conduct diagnostic testing for BRCA 1 and 2, genes that are linked to familial breast and ovarian cancer. The court case and rulings garnered discussion in public about patenting biological materials. This paper describes the progression of the Myriad Genetics case, similar US rulings and biological intellectual property policies. In addition, it discusses the impact of the case on biological patents – specifically those for human embryonic stem cells.

Read the full article in Regenerative Medicine.

https://doi.org/10.2217/rme.13.93
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Medical workers working in conference room.
Center for Health Policy | Health Economics | Issue Brief

The Growing Gap Between Hospital CEO and Direct Care Pay

Read More
Artificial intelligence concept.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How Artificial Intelligence Affects Childhood Development

Read More
Flooded cars on the street of the city.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

What FEMA’s New Flood Maps Mean for Houston Schools

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy