Implications of Mexico’s Energy Reform on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Jorge Eduardo Mendoza Cota
Economics Department, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte
Share this Publication
- Download PDF
- Print This Publication
- Cite This Publication Copy Citation
Jorge Eduardo Mendoza Cota, “Implications of Mexico’s Energy Reform on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, March 25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.25613/VA54-A391.
Abstract
The energy sector of Mexico plays an essential role in the country’s economic development and social well-being. The recent changes in its energy policies seek to achieve energy autonomy and will have significant implications for the sector’s future, particularly within the context of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This research paper analyzes the possible impacts of these changes on Mexico’s energy sector, considering the regulations of the USMCA. Additionally, the concept of energy sovereignty — or the right of a country to make decisions about its own energy resources — is used to assess the advantages and disadvantages of this new strategy. Among the positive impacts, better management of energy prices and a reduced external impact of energy trade are highlighted. However, the challenges associated with the pursuit of energy self-sufficiency are also addressed. The resulting uncertainty could negatively affect the new investments and technology required to strengthen Mexico’s energy sector.
View the full paper (PDF).
This publication was produced on behalf of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, the material was reviewed by external experts prior to its release. Any errors are the responsibility of the author(s) alone.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.