Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    USMCA Flags
    Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico
    Thu, July 09, 2026 | 10 am - 11 am
    The State of Negotiations of the USMCA See Details
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

The Case of the Gulf Cooperation Council

February 24, 2020 | Paul Stevens
Oil drums

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Paul Stevens

Distinguished Fellow, Chatham House

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Resource curseGCC (Gulf Cooperation Council)

To access the full working paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar. 

Introduction

Purpose of this paper is to answer the questions in the research protocol in the context of the petroleum sector in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC). However, for reasons to be developed, the history of this sector was unique. In particular, the traditional view of resource curse is not entirely appropriate. It is difficult to argue that the windfall revenues generated by the sector damaged the rest of the economy. Before the sector developed, ‘the rest of the economy’ was only subsistence, pearl fishing or some trading. A more productive analytical approach is to ask, given the enormous wealth created by the sector, why did the economies not perform better? The answer is simply that the governments and the international oil companies (IOCs) for the most part failed to optimize the linkages that existed between the sector and the rest of the economy. These linkages involved fiscal, forward and backward linkages although where the blame lies for this failure as will be seen is debatable.

The paper begins by explaining why the GCC makes for a good case study. This is followed by a history of relations between the governments and IOCs with emphasis on their attitudes to the linkages and how they changed over time. This history is then used to address the specific questions in the ‘research protocol’. Finally, based on the history and the answers, the main lessons are drawn that might guide future FDI.

© 2020 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
EMEC1
Center for Energy Studies | Press Release

Rice’s Baker Institute launches Eastern Mediterranean Energy Center with US Department of Energy

Read More
Oil Field. Winter industrial landscape with an oil pump and torch in the background.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

How Declining Oil Production Could Weaken Russia’s Geopolitical Power

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy