Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
    Ellen Ochoa Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Mon, Nov. 02, 2026 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Joni Sue Lane Lecture Series — Exploring Space: A Conversation With Astronaut Ellen Ochoa See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Tax and Budget Policy | Working Paper

Bank Lending and Interest on Excess Reserves

February 7, 2018 | Thomas Hogan
Money sits in a bank safe.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Thomas Hogan

Fellow in Public Finance

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteBankingFinanceFederal Reserve Bank

To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between bank lending and the Federal Reserve’s policy of paying interest on excess reserves (IOER). We argue that the Fed’s IOER policy deviates from the standard interest-rate floor framework in ways that influence banks’ incentives to hold loans and reserves. Using quarterly data from the start of 2000 through the third quarter of 2017, we find that banks’ holdings of loans and reserves are related to GDP growth and employment but are not related to measures of loan demand or economic uncertainty. Accounting for these factors, banks’ loan holdings are inversely related to both the rate of IOER and to its premium above short-term market interest rates. We estimate that the Fed’s IOER policy accounts for more than half of the post-crisis decline in bank loan allocations.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2018 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

President Ronald Reagan signing bill
Center for Tax and Budget Policy | Commentary

The Social Security Trust Fund Will Run Dry in 2032 – What That Means for Retirees and Workers Who Hope To Retire

Read More
colorful cargo containers diagonal image
Center for Tax and Budget Policy | Issue Brief

AI Investment Reshapes US Import Patterns

Read More
US tax form 1040, 1120, 1065
Baker Briefing | Center for Tax and Budget Policy | Podcast

Tax Day Edition — Debt, Defense, and Economic Uncertainty

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy