Comparing Personnel Compensation Across Texas’ Largest Cities
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Sara Davidson
Program Manager, Center for Tax and Budget Policy
Bill King
Fellow in Public FinanceJohn W. Diamond
Edward A. and Hermena Hancock Kelly Senior Fellow in Public Finance | Director, Center for Tax and Budget PolicyShare this Publication
- Download PDF
- Print This Publication
- Cite This Publication Copy Citation
Sara Davidson, Bill King, and John W. Diamond, “Comparing Personnel Compensation Across Texas’ Largest Cities,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, July 20, 2026, https://doi.org/10.25613/CNS8-P353.
Overview
This survey calculates the average budgeted personnel cost per employee for Texas’ five largest cities and, to the extent the demarcation of departments was consistent, between comparable departments. The survey uses the latest budgetary data offered from each city, with Houston having recently published its FY 27 budget and all other cities, Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio, using FY 26 budgets, due to these cities having later budget cycles. The numbers show that the average budgeted personnel cost for all municipal workers varied by more than $25,000 between the five cities. Adjusting for localized purchasing power differences ultimately reorders which cities offer the highest actual compensation. This survey also shows the public safety departments, defined as police and fire departments, to be at or near the highest average levels of personnel costs, despite wide variance between cities.
View the full paper (PDF).
This publication was produced by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. It has not been through editorial review. Wherever feasible, the material was reviewed by outside experts prior to release. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author(s).
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.