Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Child at border plays in the dirt with superhero toy
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain on the left
    Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Thu, Mar. 02, 2023 | 11:30 am - 1:30 pm
    How Kuwait and Other Gulf Oil Giants Are Navigating the Energy Transition See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Are Consumption Taxes Really Regressive?

November 30, 2017 | Jorge Barro
Pen pointing at chart

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Jorge Barro
Jorge Barro
Fellow in Public Finance
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Barro, Jorge. 2017. Are Consumption Taxes Really Regressive? Issue brief no. 11.30.17. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

Tags

taxestaxestaxesBaker Institute

In the United States, state and municipal governments rely heavily on consumption tax revenues to finance their expenditures. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, consumption taxation generated $544 billion of revenue in 2015, amounting to 3% of gross domestic product and financing roughly one-third of all sub-federal level expenditures. Roughly two-thirds of consumption tax revenue was generated by sales taxes, while the remaining one-third was generated by excise and other consumption taxes. As of 2017, 45 states and the District of Columbia, as well as municipal governments in 38 states, collect sales taxes,1 while every state and several municipal governments, as well as the U.S. federal government, levy some kind of excise tax.2

Given this extensive dependence on consumption taxation to finance government expenditures, policymakers should carefully consider who bears the burden of the tax.

On the surface, a consumption tax seems simple: a tax that is proportional to the things that we consume. In reality, consumption tax bases are highly partitioned into groups of expenditure items that receive special treatment, either through differential tax rates or through tax exemptions. Housing, for example, is not taxed at the sales tax rate, but rather at the property tax rate. Most health care expenditures, by contrast, are exempt from taxation altogether.

Many argue that sales and excise taxes are regressive based on the strict relationship between annual income and taxes paid. As a household’s income rises, the portion of income allocated to consumption declines, and the portion allocated to savings rises—concepts for which John Maynard Keynes coined the terms “marginal propensity to consume” and “marginal propensity to save.” This decline in consumption as a percentage of income is often used to substantiate claims of consumption tax regressivity. Such a claim obfuscates the fact that savings is just another term for future consumption, which eventually faces similar tax exposure.

Because annual income fluctuates significantly over a lifetime, economist James Poterba argued that annual consumption taxes paid as a fraction of annual income is not a good measure of tax progressivity. Individuals use savings to shift consumption throughout their lives, suggesting that lifetime consumption taxes paid as a fraction of lifetime income is a better measure of consumption tax progressivity. As a proxy for lifetime consumption tax progressivity, Poterba proposed studying consumption expenditure composition as it relates to income. If consumption composition shifts away from taxable items as income increases, then the consumption tax burden falls disproportionately onto households with lower lifetime income, confirming claims of consumption tax regressivity. However, if taxable consumption increases with income, we have no reason to conclude that the tax burden falls more heavily onto households with lower lifetime income.

A particularly interesting feature of sales and excise taxes is that individuals can avoid them by not consuming the taxed items. For example, one could take public transportation to avoid paying sales tax on a vehicle and excise tax on fuel. Because of this differential tax treatment across consumption goods, each household expenditure can be categorized according to whether or not it is included in the sales or excise tax bases. Following Poterba’s method, measuring the relationship between sales- and excise-taxable expenditures and income provides a better indication of how the respective tax burden corresponds to lifetime income.

To test whether high-income earners substitute away from taxable goods, a typical tax base can be reconstructed using the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX). This data set contains detailed information regarding household expenditures and income levels. The first step in analyzing the data involves identifying which consumption items are typically included in sales or excise tax bases. The next step involves determining how taxable consumption in each tax base changes with household income. A negative relationship would indicate that the tax burden falls more heavily on low-income households, while a positive relationship would imply the opposite.

Description of Data

This study analyzes data from the 2015 CEX, which documents an estimated 60-70% of all household expenditures at varying granularity of consumption categories.3 Although the expenditure items in the survey do not comprise an exhaustive budget, the CEX still provides the best data available for studying taxable expenditure patterns as they relate to income.

Figure 1 — Expenditure Composition and Income

This graph shows how broad expenditure categories change with annual household income levels.

Figure 1 shows how broad expenditure categories change with annual household income levels. The largest expenditure share is housing, which makes up roughly one-third of all measured expenditures and declines as income rises. The next largest share is food, retail, and miscellaneous expenditures, which comprise nearly a quarter of measured expenditures at every income level. Education and financial expenditures, which include insurance payments and contributions to pensions, tend to rise with income. Transportation outlays, including vehicle payments and fuel, comprise around 10% of measured expenditures and decline with income. Average health expenditures by households are less than 10% of measured consumer expenditures, and the expenditure share declines slightly with income. Finally, alcohol and tobacco maintain a small but flat share of expenditures.

Description of Taxable Items

Sales Tax Base

While each state levies its sales tax on a unique set of consumption goods, several states have many of the same items in their tax bases. Of the large expenditure categories, education, financial services, and health are generally excluded from sales taxation. Within the housing expenditures category, property payments, such as rent or mortgage, are generally excluded from the sales tax base, but home furnishings and appliances are usually not excluded. This leaves transportation, food, retail, and miscellaneous expenditures to comprise the remaining sales tax base. Groceries are usually exempt from sales taxation, while restaurant dining is often not exempt. Public transportation is generally excluded from sales taxation, but vehicle payments are included in the sales tax base. Retail and miscellaneous items, such as personal care products, are generally taxed as sales, but most services are not taxed. For the purpose of constructing a realistic sales tax base, entertainment services, such as sporting event tickets, are included in the sales tax base, but other services are excluded.

Excise Tax Base

Consumption items are categorized as excise-taxable based on whether they are generally treated by the tax system uniquely. Motor vehicle fuel, alcohol, tobacco, lodging (e.g., hotel stays), and home utilities, such as electricity and water, each satisfy the definition of an excise tax and collectively comprise the excise tax base.

Measuring Progressivity

Figure 2 — Sales-taxable Consumption Share and Income

This graph shows that the share of expenditures included in the sales tax base increases steadily for households earning up to $100,000 per year.

After carefully evaluating the CEX data set and constructing a typical tax base, the next step is to estimate the percentage of taxable expenditures across income levels.4 Figure 2 shows that the share of expenditures included in the sales tax base increases steadily by roughly five percentage points—from 18% to 23%—for households earning up to $100,000 per year. However, the base declines around one percentage point beyond $130,000 and stabilizes at around 22% of consumption for households earning above $200,000.

Figure 3 — Excise-taxable Consumption Share and Income

This graph shows that the excise tax burden falls more heavily on lower-income households.

This graph suggests that sales taxation may actually be progressive for most households. Data from the 2015 Current Population Survey shows that 73.6% of U.S. households had an annual income less than $100,000, and 87.7% of households had an income below $150,000. Further breakdown of this relationship across different age groups results in a similar pattern, suggesting that lifetime consumption patterns do not show evidence of differential age-dependent tax incidence after accounting for income. This suggests that a shift in taxation toward sales taxation may actually increase a state or municipal tax structure’s progressivity.

Figure 3 shows that the excise tax burden falls more heavily on lower-income households. As household income increases up to $100,000, the fraction of excise-taxable expenditures falls about six percentage points and declines another four percentage points as household income rises to $300,000. As opposed to sales taxation, a shift toward excise taxation reduces the progressivity of a state or municipal tax structure.

Conclusion

Although sales taxation often faces opposition based on the assumption of a strict relationship between income and taxes paid, this analysis shows that sales-taxable consumption actually rises with income. This implies that the burden of an increase in the sales tax rate may actually fall more heavily on households with higher lifetime incomes. By contrast, excise-taxable consumption falls as income rises, suggesting that increases in excise taxes unambiguously affect lower-income households more than higher-income households.

While this study can serve as a quick reference for policymakers considering the effects of changing the sales or excise tax rate, a tax jurisdiction’s actual tax progressivity depends on the unique composition of its tax base. Choosing to restructure the sales or excise tax base through exemptions and inclusions almost certainly changes the tax structure’s progressivity. To that extent, policymakers wishing to study the progressivity of taxing particular consumption bundles can reconstruct elements of their specific tax base using the CEX to measure the relationship between taxable consumption share and income.

Endnotes

1. See Tax Foundation at https://taxfoundation.org/state-and-local-sales-tax-rates-in-2017/.

2. Ibid.

3. See Bureau of Labor Statistics at https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cex/data.htm.

4. In Figures 2 and 3, a non-parametric locally weighted regression is used to estimate the percentage of taxable consumption as it relates to income.

References

Keynes, John M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Poterba, James M. 1989. “Lifetime incidence and the distributional burden of excise taxes.” Working paper no. 2833, National Bureau of Economic Research.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2017 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Woman Bills
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Recent U.S. Consumer Trends: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed — Should We Be Blue?

Read More
Covid Graph
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Assessing Recession Risk in a Post-pandemic Economy

Read More
Texas Capitol
Center for Public Finance | Commentary

Politicians in Texas Could be Using Anticipation Notes to Fund Projects Taxpayers Don’t Want

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy