To access the full article, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.
By Vivian Ho, Martin J. Heslin, Huifeng Yun and Lee Howard
Background: We measure 13-year trends in operative mortality for six cancer resections. We then examine whether these trends are driven by changes in hospital and surgeon volume, or by changes that occurred among all providers, regardless of volume.
Methods: We analyzed administrative discharge data on patients who received one of six cancer resections in Florida, New Jersey, and New York for three time periods: 1988 to 1991, 1992 to 1996, and 1997 to 2000. Descriptive statistics and nested regression models were used to test for changes in the association between inpatient mortality and annual hospital and annual surgeon volume over time, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
Results: Unadjusted inpatient mortality rates for the six cancer resections declined between 0.8 and 4.0 percentage points between the time period 1988 to 1991 and 1997 to 2000. Over this time period, annual hospital and surgeon volume for the six cancer operations rose an average of 24.3% and 24.2% respectively. The logistic regressions indicated a relatively stable relationship over time between both increased hospital and surgeon volume and lower inpatient mortality. Simulations suggest that increases in hospital and surgeon procedure volume over time led to a reduction in inpatient mortality ranging from .1 percentage points for rectal cancer to 2.3 percentage points for pneumonectomy.
Conclusion: Persistence of the volume-outcome relation and rising hospital and surgeon volumes explain much of the decline over time in inpatient mortality for five of the six cancer operations studied. Concentrating cancer resections among high-volume providers should lead to further reduced inpatient mortality.
Published in Annals of Surgical Oncology.
