Should the Federal Reserve Cut Interest Rates?
Table of Contents
Author(s)
John W. Diamond
Edward A. and Hermena Hancock Kelly Senior Fellow in Public Finance | Director, Center for Tax and Budget PolicyAbout the Episode
The Federal Reserve’s dual mandate — keeping prices stable and achieving maximum employment — is being tested.
At its Sept. 17 meeting, the central bank must decide whether or not to cut interest rates, a decision complicated by persistent inflation, a cooling labor market, and an escalating pressure campaign waged by the Donald Trump administration. Trump has pushed for steep rate cuts, repeatedly called for Fed chair Jerome Powell to step down, and more recently moved to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook in a broader effort to gain leverage over the independent agency.
John W. Diamond lays out the political and monetary challenges facing the Fed and explains what really matters for the country’s long-term economic health.
This conversation was recorded on Aug. 27, 2025.
Subscribe and listen to “The Two-Handed Economist” on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Clips used in this episode:
- “Trump calls Fed chair Powell ‘stupid person,’” Reuters, June 18, 2025.
- “New Fed statement about Trump plan to fire Lisa Cook,” CBS News, August 26, 2025.
- “Fed Chair Powell: Labor market is in a ‘curious kind of balance,’” CNBC, August 22, 2025.
About ‘The Two-Handed Economist’
“The Two-Handed Economist” delivers timely analysis of economic news from John Diamond, director of the Baker Institute Center for Tax and Budget Policy. Each week, John dives deep into the latest policy developments — mostly at the federal level, but with insights now and again into Texas and Houston finance as well.
Why a two-handed economist, you might ask? President Harry Truman famously asked for a one-handed economist, tired of hearing, “On the one hand, this,” and “On the other hand, that.” John embraces the complexity that a one-handed economist might shy away from, explaining how it all adds up for consumers, businesses, and policymakers.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.