Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    USMCA Flags
    Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico
    Thu, July 09, 2026 | 10 am - 11 am
    The State of Negotiations of the USMCA See Details
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

More Transitions, Less Risk: How Renewable Energy Reduces Risks from Mining, Trade and Political Dependence

September 9, 2021 | Jim Krane
Windmills in the sunset

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Jim Krane

Diana Tamari Sabbagh Fellow in Middle East Energy Studies | CES Lead, Energy and Geopolitics in the Middle East | Codirector, Middle East Energy Roundtable

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Abstract

The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy systems involves enormous decreases in materials, mining, and political risk. Since renewable systems need no fuel, they depend on trade only for the acquisition of materials and components during construction. Once the system is operating, no trade is required to sustain it. Therefore renewable energy production is not exposed to the political risks that plague fossil fuel production and shipments, such as interdiction, embargo, civil war, labor actions, and other disruptions. Despite such benefits, an emerging perspective in the US public discourse makes the opposite case, arguing that a buildout of renewable electricity would exacerbate supply risks, mining intensity, and import dependence. This paper’s findings challenge such assertions. We demonstrate that installing just 1 GW of wind capacity to replace coal on a grid like that in Texas reduces total mining by 25 million tonnes over 20 years. Even if the world increased 12- fold the annual global production of all rare earths, lithium, cobalt, and even copper, the metals produced would comprise just 3% of 2020 world coal production. Over two decades, five times more power would be produced by mining an equivalent amount for wind rather than coal. Since transition materials requirements are so comparatively small, reduced international trade volumes mean a large measure of political risk falls away. Current practices for securing energy systems that require constant fuel deliveries thus offer little relevance for renewables.

Find the full article in Energy Research and Social Science or download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102311
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
EMEC1
Center for Energy Studies | Press Release

Rice’s Baker Institute launches Eastern Mediterranean Energy Center with US Department of Energy

Read More
Oil Field. Winter industrial landscape with an oil pump and torch in the background.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

How Declining Oil Production Could Weaken Russia’s Geopolitical Power

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy