Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Child at border plays in the dirt with superhero toy
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain on the left
    Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Thu, Mar. 02, 2023 | 11:30 am - 1:30 pm
    How Kuwait and Other Gulf Oil Giants Are Navigating the Energy Transition See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Commentary

Has Joe Manchin Saved the North American Auto Industry?

August 30, 2022 | David A. Gantz
Electric pump

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Head shot of international trade fellow David Gantz
David A. Gantz
Will Clayton Fellow in Trade and International Economics
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

USMCAelectric vehiclesMexicotrade

Joe Manchin (D-WVA), the bane of President Biden's policies that address climate change, may have saved the North American automotive industry from becoming simply the U.S. auto industry. How did he do this? By rejecting the original Build Back Better Act's $12,000 EV and EV battery subsidy program, which would have limited most of the subsidies to vehicles and batteries built in the U.S. (not in North America), and with union labor. (The new legislation at $430 billion is less than 25% of the original BBBA package.)

Instead, the revised and sharply limited legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), maintains the current EV subsidy of $7,500 for vehicles built in North America, albeit with many conditions, and lifts the 200,000-vehicle cap as of January 1, 2023, a significant boon for major EV producers such as Tesla and General Motors. Further, it makes the subsidies available for individual taxpayers making up to $150,000 and couples reporting up to $300,000, another boon for the auto industry since high income Americans are those most likely to be able to afford the steep prices for EVs.

Because of limitations on the sourcing of EV battery materials and components, subsidies for most EVs sold in the U.S. will be problematic for at least the next five years. The subsidies are not available for automobile purchases above $55,000 (take that Lexus, Mercedes and Porsche!) but do apply to small trucks and SUVs up to a purchase price of $80,000. Some vehicles that were previously eligible for the earlier $7,500 subsidy are no longer so as of the signing of the law on August 16. Still, experts suggest that U.S.-based automakers (regardless of ownership) with North American-centered battery supply chains and North American-based producers of battery raw materials will eventually reap significant benefits through being able to offer the subsidy incentive to many of their potential customers.

Others can decide whether subsidizing high income EV purchasers at the obvious expense of taxpayers who cannot yet afford EVs is responsible tax policy, even if it somewhat encourages the switchover to EVs over the next five to 10 years. Perhaps as a sop to the rest of the population, the legislation provides a $4,000 subsidy for purchasers of used EVs.

The new law also provides subsidies of more than $20 billion for auto and parts producers to retool for EVs, batteries and motors, conditioned on achieving higher domestic content over next several years (and thus reducing dependence on Chinese EV batteries and materials). For those auto and battery manufacturers (e.g., Ford, General Motors, Toyota, LG Energy Solutions, Samsung and others) who have already committed billions of dollars to EV and EV battery production in Alabama, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, North Carolina and Tennessee, these loans and grants would offer an additional incentive, along with the substantial state-offered subsidies in each instance noted above to locate production in their jurisdictions.

Under such circumstances, will the elimination of limits on consumer subsidies to U.S.-produced EVs and EV batteries in favor of North American production stem the otherwise "Buy American, invest American, employ Americans" policies of the Trump and now Biden administrations? As some Canadian and Mexican government officials—who protested vigorously against the original BBBA auto subsidies—realize, the revised law is a positive step in favor of the USMCA.

Even if vehicles and key components produced in Canada and Mexico are eligible, vehicles produced in significant auto exporting nations such as Germany, Japan and South Korea are not. The eligible vehicles must be produced with battery materials from the U.S. or from a country that has a free trade agreement with the U.S., e.g., from Canada, Mexico and South Korea among others, but not Japan, Europe or (of course) China. Some foreign officials have complained about the discrimination and charged that the subsidies specific to EV and EV battery manufacturers are a violation of the WTO's Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures if they cause injury to other producers (difficult in practice to demonstrate). Rules against performance requirements,” tying benefits to sourcing parts and components locally rather than from other producers may also be violated.  Moreover, while Canada and Mexico have not committed resources to subsidize the EV industry, it may be that subsidies offered by Germany, Japan and South Korea to their own EV producers undercut the practical risk of a WTO action. (In any event, since December 2019 when the WTO's Appellate Body ceased to function, the risk of trade sanctions against the U.S. or any of the other WTO parties has been negligible.)

Still, it is much too soon to rejoice. First, the USMCA rules of origin agreed to by all three parties in 2018 strongly encourage auto and auto parts production in the U.S. (and to a lesser extent in Canada) by requiring 40% of auto values and 45% of small truck values to be derived from workers paid at least $16 per hour, which cuts out most Mexican production. The new rules of origin — denying full credit to major auto components made in North America with some imported parts —  currently under USMCA Chapter 31 litigation among the three parties, could further jeopardize the current integration of the industry if the U.S. view prevails.

As is obvious to many readers, Mexico is no longer as attractive a place for new capital investment as it was before Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) became president on Dec. 1, 2018. Stellantis (formerly Fiat-Chrysler) has announced plans to build a battery factory in Windsor, Ontario, where it produces minivans for the U.S. market. Ford is now making EVs in one of its Mexican factories (in part because of duty-free exports that are possible to the more than 20 nations with which Mexico has free trade agreements). However, Ford has not announced any plans for new facilities in Mexico. General Motors’ management has gone further, indicating that it will not invest more in auto production in Mexico unless and until Mexico implements plans for cleaner electricity production.

In my view, Mexico’s highly negative investment climate is the other factor — perhaps as or more important than U.S. federal and state subsidies to auto and auto parts production — that may well discourage Mexico from receiving major new investments in the sector that represents well over 20% of USMCA regional trade. Leaving aside the litigation against AMLO’s government resulting from the “creeping expropriation” of U.S., Spanish and Italian clean energy projects and U.S.-owned fuel distributors in Mexico, encouraged under the previous administration's 2013 legislative and constitutional changes, other major industries and services appear to be holding back as well.

Most of the government power monopoly CFE's electricity is generated with Pemex's dirty fuel oil or coal; even a switch to natural gas, let alone clean energy, is years, perhaps decades, away. Nor is the government apparently authorizing new independent power projects, many of which produce cleaner energy than CFE for their customers. For example, where a multinational enterprise such as General Motors has a commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 or 2050 (or Microsoft Mexico states that it will be carbon negative globally by 2030), is it wise to  invest in Mexican facilities that will bring down the average for decades?

EV and EV battery producers have further reasons not to choose Mexico. First, other than in high pollution areas such as metropolitan Mexico City, there is no obvious environmental benefit to substituting EVs for gasoline vehicles when the energy required for charging is expensive, unreliable and dirty. Second, the relatively high cost of EVs for the vast majority of Mexican citizens is prohibitive and is likely to remain so for years.

In conclusion, it is evident that Sen. Manchin (perhaps with the assistance of the government of Canada) and those who accepted his conditions for the IRA have saved the U.S. government from what could have been a mortal blow to an integrated North American industry by refusing to go along with an increased consumer subsidy fully available only for EVs and batteries produced in the U.S. with union labor. Whether that will be sufficient to save regional, particularly Mexican, automotive production in the coming years and decades in view of other U.S. subsidies and Mexican anti-foreign investment policies remains to be seen.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Mexico Flag
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Report

Mexico Country Outlook 2023

Read More
Rio Grande
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Report

Treaty and Non-Treaty Mechanisms for Resolving the Rio Grande River Water Debt Dilemma

Read More
Hand types on laptop keyboard, with icons and symbols extruded from the screen; future tech, AI concept
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Journal

A Social Network Analysis of Mexico’s Dark Network Alliance Structure

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy