The Federal Budget’s March Madness
Table of Contents
Author(s)
John W. Diamond
Edward A. and Hermena Hancock Kelly Senior Fellow in Public Finance | Director, Center for Tax and Budget PolicyAbout the Episode
If the Federal Government was scaled down to a household budget, it would make $52,000 a year and be spending $73,000 – a surplus of $21,000 that would quickly put the average American in debt. In this episode of “The Two-Handed Economist,” John Diamond dives into the current financial state of the Federal Government and its connection to the silent but approaching private credit troubles looming in the background. By taking the trillion dollar issue of the Federal Government and moving it into a scalable point of reference, Diamond explains the long-term accountability issues that are only going to worsen in our budget.
On the private credit side, he sheds light onto this opaque, untested market and warns its vulnerability could spill over to the public market and Capitol Hill, pressuring lawmakers to step in and provide relief in their already inflexible financial state.
This conversation was recorded on Mar. 24, 2026.
Subscribe and listen to “The Two-Handed Economist” wherever you get your podcasts.
About ‘The Two-Handed Economist’
“The Two-Handed Economist” delivers timely analysis of economic news from John Diamond, director of the Baker Institute Center for Tax and Budget Policy. Each week, John dives deep into the latest policy developments — mostly at the federal level, but with insights now and again into Texas and Houston finance as well.
Why a two-handed economist, you might ask? President Harry Truman famously asked for a one-handed economist, tired of hearing, “On the one hand, this,” and “On the other hand, that.” John embraces the complexity that a one-handed economist might shy away from, explaining how it all adds up for consumers, businesses, and policymakers.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.