Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Map of the Middle East
    Wed, June 10, 2026 | 5 pm - 6:45 pm
    The Middle East and US Foreign Policy: What Happens Next? See Details
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
International Economics | Working Paper

Why Was the Plaza Accord Unique?

September 16, 2015 | Russell Green, David H. Papell, Ruxandra Prodan
International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Russell Green

Former Fellow

David H. Papell

Joel W. Sailors Endowed Professor, University of Houston

Ruxandra Prodan

Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Houston

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteInternational economicsCurrencyPlaza accord

To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

Abstract

This chapter explores what made the Plaza such a unique combination of strong cooperation and effective intervention relative to the rest of the post-Bretton Woods period. We demonstrate that in the first quarter of 1985 the US dollar was more overvalued in real terms, relative to exchange rates implied by real interest differentials, for all G-7 economies except Canada, than at any other time between 1973 and 2005. Further, we use Taylor rules to create a benchmark for consistency of intervention with monetary policy. We show that foreign exchange intervention in 1985 was consistent with the direction of monetary policy prescribed by the deviation of policy rates from the implied Taylor rule rates for the U.S., but only weakly so for Germany and Japan. This reinforces the view that the impact of the Plaza on exchange rates derived primarily from the major policy shift in the U.S.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2015 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Rendering of World Trade Organization delegates finalizing international trade agreements
International Economics | Issue Brief

Unfinished Business: Bringing China Into the Club of Market-Oriented Countries

Read More
North America economic growth
International Economics | Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico | Commentary

A New Chapter in Trade: Preparing for the Landmark Review of the USMCA

Read More
China trade relations
International Economics | Commentary

Beyond US Unilateralism: Rethinking the Response to China’s Trade Practices

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy