Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Analyzing market trends
    McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    Mon, Apr. 03, 2023 | 12 pm - 1 pm
    Free Enterprise Lunch & Learn: Why Capitalism Is the Most Ethical Economic System See Details
    Electric car concept
    Roundtable
    Tue, Apr. 04, 2023 | 4 pm - 5:30 pm
    Baker Briefing: Tesla, Taxes and Texas See Details
    Innovators design new technology
    McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth | Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Apr. 05, 2023 | 2 pm - 3 pm
    Accelerating Research into Innovation: What Universities and the US Patent Office Can Do to Pick Up the Pace See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Issue Brief

Why the Islamic State in Afghanistan is Too Weak to Overthrow the Taliban

September 29, 2022 | Fazal Muzhary
Afghanistan Conflict
Photo by Xinhua News Agency / Contributor Getty Images

Table of Contents

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Muzhary, Fazal. Is the Islamic State in Afghanistan Strong Enough to Overthrow the Taliban? Issue brief no. 09.29.22. Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas. https://doi.org/10.25613/1EJ8-J225.

    Copy Citation

Tags

AfghanistanISIS

Introduction

In August 2021, the U.S. military withdrew the last of its troops from Afghanistan, which led to the Taliban’s rapid takeover and the toppling of the U.S.-backed government in Kabul. A little more than a year later, the Taliban are still in control, and concerns persist in the West over their ties with al-Qaeda and reports of human rights abuses. At the same time, ISIS-K, a branch of the Islamic State in Afghanistan that’s known for its violent ideology and goal of militarily defeating the Taliban due to sectarian differences, has continued its campaign of violence throughout the nation. This issue brief offers an assessment of ISIS-K to determine if it has the capability to overthrow the Taliban.  

Over the last year, ISIS-K has maintained a steady stream of attacks against various soft targets in the country, in particular religious minorities. Recently, it targeted the Russian embassy in Kabul, killing two Russians and four Afghan civilians in a suicide attack.[1] This is the first time Russian nationals were killed in Kabul since the withdrawal of Soviet soldiers from Afghanistan in 1989. According to a UN report,[2] a total of 700 civilians have been killed and 1,406 wounded since the Taliban’s takeover — and much of this violence has been perpetrated by ISIS-K. Several American generals[3] have even expressed concerns that the group is “solidifying its foothold” in Afghanistan.

The violence and brutality of ISIS-K against Afghan civilians is deeply concerning and signifies how the group continues to be a source of substantial insecurity for the nation. However, carefully examining the group’s activities reveals that ISIS-K has failed to engage the Taliban in meaningful, face-to-face confrontations — even in areas that were previously ISIS-K’s territorial strongholds. ISIS-K has occasionally ambushed isolated checkpoints of the Taliban,[4] but, by and large, the group has avoided active confrontations with the Taliban that would allow it to assert territorial control.

ISIS-K’s current modus operandi suggests that it remains organizationally weak. The group does not seem to have the capacity to mount major coordinated attacks that would overwhelm Taliban defenses. It also seems to lack the confidence to operate in ways that could amount to a nationwide threat to the Taliban. Why is this?

Three possible explanations — that are essential for policymakers monitoring the situation in Afghanistan to understand — are outlined below.

Reason 1: ISIS-K has Limited Local Support

First, ISIS-K is struggling with local support due to its past behavior. Nangarhar, a province of Afghanistan bordering Pakistan in the east, was formerly the central hub for ISIS-K when it first emerged in 2015. However, the group is now feared and disliked in the province.

In 2015, local communities welcomed the early fighters of the group, who had defected from the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan. Migrating from Pakistan, they were received as guests in the area.[5] But ISIS-K fighters behaved poorly with the civilian population, something that remains etched in the minds of most communities. To assert control in the Nangarhar province, ISIS-K leaders and fighters punished the most important members of the community — elders. They harassed them consistently; at times, they inflicted some of the worst violence against them, including forcing them to sit on explosives before blowing them up to make examples out of them.[6]

Over time, such poor treatment turned what was a hospitable community into a hostile enemy.[7] As a result, local communities were galvanized to join the Afghan Taliban as well as former Afghan government forces to defeat ISIS-K.[8]

In the province of Kunar, as ISIS-K commanders imposed strict rules, including capital punishment, local civilians turned against them — just as the communities in Nangarhar province had done.[9]

ISIS-K's trajectory contrasts with that of the Taliban, which enjoyed considerable local support as an insurgency. With the passage of time, the Taliban locked in more support, which helped them intercept intelligence between American and Afghan forces to evade being targeted or captured.[10] This is apparent most clearly by the fact that the Taliban only lost one top leader to American targeting: Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansur in 2016. In fact, he was not killed in Afghanistan, where the Taliban had local support, but in a drone strike in Pakistan.[11] Even Mullah Omar, the founder of the Taliban, was able to rely on local support to shield himself: He lived in a house an hour’s walk away from an American military base in the province of Zabul for almost a decade.[12] 

Reason 2: ISIS-K is Perceived as a Foreign Group

Beyond limited popular support, a second major reason for ISIS-K’s weakness is that it is widely perceived as a foreign group in many Afghan communities, both ideologically and as an organization itself. This problem is traceable to the first years of its existence in the country: ISIS-K leadership and its initial rank-and-file fighters were mostly Pakistanis. Key Pakistani leaders included Hafiz Saeed Khan, Abdul Haseeb Logari (an Afghan but a native of Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), Abu Omar Khorasani and Asalm Farooqi.[13]

Only years later did Afghans join the ranks of ISIS-K and take minor leadership roles — but even then they did not join in large numbers. In many instances Afghans struggled to attain leadership positions in the group.[14] This reinforced the perception that ISIS-K was a foreign entity and limited its ability to appeal to a broader cross-section of Afghan society, even when many were disillusioned with the former Afghan government and the Taliban. This, in turn, depressed ISIS-K’s recruitment of local youth in the rural areas of Nangarhar, a main base of operations for the group.[15]

ISIS-K sought to compensate for its limited appeal in rural areas by turning to urban recruits. It focused on young bourgeoise men with modern education who lived mostly in Kabul and the surrounding cities.[16] But this came at a cost: The urban recruits were less useful to the group than the rural rank-and-file members who lived in key areas of operations like Nangarhar.[17]

Reason 3: ISIS-K Lacks a Strong Ideological Platform

Finally, ISIS-K has struggled to provide a strong ideological platform for its organization; instead it has fashioned itself in narrow sectarian terms, which limits its appeal. The vast majority of Afghans follow the Hanafi jurisprudence of Sunni Islam, but almost all Afghan and foreign fighters of ISIS-K are followers of the Salafi sect of the Islamic jurisprudence.[18] Followers of this theology are limited to parts of the Nangarhar, Kunar and Nuristan provinces.[19]

ISIS-K has not only struggled to appeal to the Hanafi community at large, it has also struggled to persuade important Afghan Salafis to support and side with them. For example, Salafi scholar Sheikh Abdul Aziz from the Nuristan province announced his allegiance with the Taliban leadership in March 2020. The group’s interest in sectarian purity also makes it difficult to absorb any defecting hardline factions of the Taliban.[20]

Conclusion

ISIS-K may be the most violent actor in Afghanistan in relative terms, yet it is not on a trajectory to replace the Taliban as a state-like actor. The group faces significant limitations due to its lack of broad-based public support, its perception as a foreign entity and its ideological shallowness. It is unlikely that ISIS-K will become a national-level threat or succeed in gaining or holding actual territory unless it undergoes significant transformation. For now, there are no signs the group has that kind of capability.

Endnotes


[1] “Kabul explosion; Russian Embassy says it is suspending people’s access to the consulate,” BBC News, September 5, 2022, https://www.bbc.com/pashto/afghanistan-62793377.

[2] “UN Releases Report On Human Rights in Afghanistan,” UNAMA (United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan), press release, July 20, 2022, https://bit.ly/3S7QIkv.

[3] Jeff Seldin, “Islamic State Growing in Afghanistan But Not Ready to Attack US, West,” VOA, March 15, 2022, https://www.voanews.com/a/islamic-state-growing-in-afghanistan-but-not-ready-to-attack-us-west-/6486786.html.

[4] “Afghanistan’s Security Challenges under the Taliban,” International Crisis Group, Asia Report no. 326, August 12, 2022, https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/326-afghanistans-security-challenges-under-taliban.

[5] Borhan Osman, “The Islamic State in ‘Khorasan’: How it began and where it stands now in Nangarhar,” Afghanistan Analysts Network, July 27, 2016, https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/war-and-peace/the-islamic-state-in-khorasan-how-it-began-and-where-it-stands-now-in-nangarhar/.

[6] Alan Cullison, “Inside the Hidden War Between the Taliban and ISIS,” The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/isis-taliban-afghanistan-bombing-11630014684.

[7] Borhan Osman, “The Islamic State in ‘Khorasan.’”

[8] Obaid Ali and Khalid Gharanai, “Hit from Many Sides (2): The demise of ISKP in Kunar,” Afghanistan Analysts Network, March 3, 2021, https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/war-and-peace/hit-from-many-sides-2-the-demise-of-iskp-in-kunar.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Bette Dam, Looking for the Enemy: Mullah Omar and the Unknown Taliban (Noida, India: HarperCollins, 2021).

[11] “Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour killed, Afghans confirm,” BBC News, May 22, 2016, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36352559.

[12] Dam, Looking for the Enemy.

[13] Daniel Byman, “Eighteen Years On: The War on Terror Comes of Age,” CTC Sentinel 12, no. 8 (September 2019), https://ctc.westpoint.edu/eighteen-years-war-terror-comes-age/.

[14] Shamshad TV, “Interview with a surrendered ISIS-K commander, Abul Rahim Muslimdost,” March 7, 2022, YouTube video, 44:23, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAiD2QgNYq0.

[15] Cullison, “Inside the Hidden War Between the Taliban and ISIS.”

[16] Borhan Osman, “Bourgeois Jihad: Why Young, Middle-Class Afghans Join the Islamic State,” United States Institute of Peace, June 1, 2020, https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/06/bourgeois-jihad-why-young-middle-class-afghans-join-islamic-state.

[17] Ali and Gharanai, “Hit from Many Sides.”

[18] Abdul Sayed, Pieter Van Ostaeyen, and Charlie Winter,“Making Sense of the Islamic State’s War on the Afghan Taliban,” Hudson Institute, January 25, 2022, https://www.hudson.org/research/17796-making-sense-of-the-islamic-state-s-war-on-the-afghan-taliban.

[19] Ali and Gharanai, “Hit from Many Sides.”

[20] Obaid Fatih, “A large number of Salafi scholars announced their allegiance with the Taliban and they termed ISIS-K as an intriguing group,” Nunn.asia, March 11, 2020, https://bit.ly/3SrflYW.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

©2022 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/1EJ8-J225
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Iraq war
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Podcast

Baker Briefing: 20 Years After the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

Read More
President Biden walks along US border wall
Women’s Rights, Human Rights and Refugees | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Policy Brief

Biden’s New Border Policies Will Put Further Strain on Mexico’s Struggling Asylum System

Read More
Muslim women
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Women’s Rights, Human Rights and Refugees | Compilation

The Intersection of Gender and Displacement in the Middle East and North Africa

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy