Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Why Governments Need Science Advice With Angela McLean See Details
    Green energy Concept
    Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Aug. 20, 2026 | 7 am - 5 pm
    3rd Annual Conference: Energy, Technology, and Grid Resilience See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

Welfare Implications of Capacity Payments in a Price-capped Electricity Sector: A Case Study of the Texas Market (ERCOT)

April 8, 2017 | Raúl Bajo Buenestado
Power lines and transmission towers against a sunset.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Raúl Bajo Buenestado

Raúl Bajo Buenestado

Nonresident Scholar
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteElectricityERCOT

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the welfare consequences of introducing capacity compensation payments in restructured and liberalized electricity markets. For that purpose, we set up a two-stage framework in which two kinds of electricity generators, peak load and base load generators, choose their capacity investment levels first and then compete on the basis of bids in a centralized market to sell electricity to consumers. We use data from the Texas ERCOT to evaluate consumers' welfare. We find that the introduction of capacity payments has two countervailing effects. On the one hand, it increases the wholesale electricity price. On the other hand, it reduces price volatility and increases the reliability of the system. We find that capacity payments are more beneficial for consumers in a perfectly competitive market than in the presence of certain degree of market power.

Read the full article in Energy Economics.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.026
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Sunrise with Kuwait Towers timelapse - the best known landmark of Kuwait City. Kuwait, Middle East.
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Report

How Institutional Barriers Shape Kuwait’s Energy Goals

Read More
Canadian landscape of rare earth mining site.
Center for Energy Studies | Energy, Minerals, and Materials | Working Paper

Limiting Adversarial Capital in Critical Minerals Supply Chains

Read More
3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy