Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Issue Brief

The U.S.-Mexico Trade Deal: Much Ado About Very Little

August 30, 2018 | Tony Payan
Colorful shipping containers.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Tony Payan
Tony Payan
Françoise and Edward Djerejian Fellow for Mexico Studies | Director, Center for the United States and Mexico
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Payan, Tony. 2018. The U.S.-Mexico Trade Deal: Much Ado About Very Little. Issue brief no. 08.30.18. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

Tags

tradeMexico trade

Introduction

On Monday, August 27, 2018, President Donald Trump and Mexico’s President Enrique Peña Nieto announced the resolution of several key issues that had blocked progress on the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The understanding announced this week includes concessions by both the U.S. and Mexico, in addition to items that were resolved in eight previous rounds of negotiations. Trump labeled the latest agreement as “maybe the largest trade deal ever.”1

The announcement—choreographed with Trump at his desk and Peña on the speaker phone—gave the impression that the two countries had reached the final stage of a bilateral trade agreement. In interviews with the media, the White House and its economic advisors touted the agreement as the beginning of the end of the negotiations, and threatened to shut out Canada if it did not make its own concessions before the end of the week. Trump also asserted that the accord should not be called NAFTA but instead, a U.S.-Mexico Free Trade agreement—an apparent slight to Canada.

Optics aside, key questions arise from this news. What, specifically, are the details of this agreement? Do the agreed-to points represent a truly significant breakthrough in NAFTA renegotiations? Are the concessions enough to call the trade agreement both novel and “the largest ... ever”? What motivated Trump and Peña to reach an agreement, especially without Canada? How will Canada respond? What obstacles lie ahead? This issue brief addresses some of these important questions.

What Are the Details of the Agreement?

It is difficult to discuss the details of the understanding, as no official document has been released. It is possible that the two governments and the negotiators do not want the media, trade experts, or critics to pick through the document in advance. But we do know that five crucial points that held back the U.S.-Mexico slice of the negotiations were resolved.

The first concession is related to rules about the origin of manufactured goods. Under the new deal, vehicles assembled in Mexico may enter the U.S. duty-free if 75% of the parts are made in North America; this is up from 62.5% of North American-made parts under NAFTA, but less than the 85% the U.S. originally pushed for. Although this item is intended to increase the number of U.S.-made products in the manufacturing chain, the production of car components could ultimately shift to Mexico. This is because the new agreement only requires the parts to be from North America—and not specifically the United States. If a car from Mexico is made from less than 75% of North American components, it will be subject to a 2.5% tariff when it enters the U.S.

Second, around 40% of all parts going into vehicles made in Mexico will have to come from countries where workers are paid at least $16 an hour. This effectively forces Mexico to raise wages for workers in its car manufacturing industry, where workers currently make around $20 a day or $2.50 an hour.2 Trump has complained that low wages in Mexico have put American workers at great disadvantage and lowered U.S. manufacturing wages. The timing and extent of the wage increase in Mexico were not specified.

Third, a sunset clause provision proposed by the United States that mandates a full renegotiation of the agreement every five years was dropped. Instead, the agreement is valid for 16 years but must be reviewed every six years starting in 2024.

Fourth, Mexico made an important concession by agreeing to have all trade disputes settled in U.S. courts. Such disputes were previously settled under NAFTA Chapter 19.3 In some business sectors—including, apparently, energy—unspecified ad hoc resolution mechanisms will settle trade disputes under the new deal.

Fifth, the U.S. made an important concession on agricultural issues by agreeing that tariffs on agricultural products from Mexico remain at the same level as under NAFTA—i.e., such products are free and clear of all tariffs and seasonal quotas.

Does the U.S.–Mexico Agreement Represent Significant Progress on NAFTA and Free Trade?

The answer is yes and no.

On one hand, the resolution of these issues advances the conversation between two NAFTA partners. It allows the U.S. and Mexico to move onto other pending issues and Canada to rejoin the negotiations. However, the resolution of these items does not amount to a new NAFTA or a new trade deal between Mexico and the United States—much less to the “largest trade deal ever.” It simply means that two NAFTA partners have dealt with some sticking points and the next steps can now be taken. Many other key issues remain unresolved, including environmental standards—a major point of contention between the U.S. and Canada.

On the other hand, the overall impact of the deal is regressive rather than progressive in that it manages trade rather than unleashes its potential. North American trade is not further integrated into an economic platform capable of increased competitiveness with Asia and Europe. Instead, it reconceives trade among NAFTA partners as a zero-sum game whereby one country’s loss is another country’s gain. The deal is not good for consumers, as it may increase the price of automobiles for all. The new agreement, for example, could incentivize parts manufacturers to move to Mexico in higher numbers, as car parts can come from either country. Alternatively, parts manufacturers could choose to skip the cumbersome calculation of component percentages and simply pay the 2.5% import fee, passing it on to consumers. Manufacturers could also move production to countries not committed by treaty to higher wages, and pay the import fees mandated by the World Trade Organization.

In the end, the newly announced agreement is much more complicated than it appears to be, and it is difficult to predict how companies will respond to the new requirements. This much is clear: the agreement is neither a modernized nor more progressive version of NAFTA.

What Moved Trump to Reach an Agreement?

Trump made key promises to his supporters during the presidential campaign and reiterated them once in office. His pledges included a building U.S. border wall, negotiating a denuclearized North Korea and a better Iran nuclear deal, launching an easy-to-win trade war with China, and forcing Europe to move on military spending. He has not been able to come through on any of these commitments. But Trump also promised to renegotiate NAFTA and do it quickly. A year into the negotiations, the parties were not yet close.

The looming November 2018 U.S midterm elections exacerbated his problems. Trump appeared ready to hit the campaign trail with none of his promises fulfilled, and he needed a win. Forcing a compromise on NAFTA by moving in Mexico’s direction was apparently seen by the U.S. as a way to get its neighbor to the north to agree on the outstanding points between the U.S. and Canada—and to have an agreement in place before the political landscape becomes more complicated in the U.S. as newly elected members of Congress take office, and in Mexico, as a new administration takes office on December 1.

It is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that Trump had a political goal rather than a policy achievement in mind by meeting Mexico in the middle when it came to NAFTA.

What Moved Peña to Accept Trump's Conditions?

Mexico’s president, Enrique Peña Nieto, is also working against the clock. New legislators will take their seats on September 1, and the country’s new president will assume office on December 1. Peña is committed to saving NAFTA because he believes that doing so would be an important part of his legacy. In addition, he is under pressure from the country’s elites to save the accord before the new administration, which won many votes from critics of NAFTA, takes office.

There also appears to be a tacit agreement between Peña and Mexico’s incoming president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, to wrap up negotiations as quickly as possible. López Obrador is not likely to have much room to maneuver when it comes to NAFTA. Any concessions he makes to Trump’s demands will quickly erode his political support: it will be interpreted as a continuation of the status quo, which López Obrador explicitly ran against. He would prefer to have Peña bear the political cost of pushing through an agreement.

Did Mexico Leave Canada Behind?

It appears that Mexico has left Canada behind, but such is not the case. Although NAFTA is a trilateral agreement, some issues are bilateral by nature. Mexico and the U.S. had important topics to discuss without Canada, much as Canada and the U.S. have issues to discuss without Mexico. Once those bilateral issues are resolved, the third partner can rejoin the table. That is exactly what happened with the U.S.-Mexico agreement.

Still, Canada and Mexico have both been clear: any agreement, in the end, must be trilateral in nature. After the U.S. and Mexico resolved their major NAFTA-related issues, Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, rushed to Washington, D.C., to rejoin the negotiations. However, it is becoming clear that Trump’s demands that Canada make quick concessions and that an agreement be ready by August 31 is unrealistic.

Obstacles Ahead

Even if Trump’s Aug. 31 deadline is met, Mexico will have a new congress on September 1, as noted above. The new members of congress are considerably more nationalistic—and more hostile to NAFTA— than those in the Peña administration. No one should expect the new congress to approve a deal without thoroughly discussing its ramifications for Mexico. A quick decision will not be rushed through. Similarly, members of the U.S. Congress have made it increasingly clear that they will not consider a two-country deal. Canada, some in Congress have argued, must be a part of any deal sent to Capitol Hill. In addition, the timing for a new deal is difficult, as many U.S. legislators will be on the campaign trail in the fall. In all, Congress does not appear amenable to taking up any major trade agreement discussions in the midst of a major political season.

The most likely outcome is that the August 31 deadline for Canada set by Trump will come and go, as others have, and the negotiations will continue. A new NAFTA, whether an improved or watered-down version, will have to wait for a better day.

Endnotes

1. Linda Qiu, “Trump Falsely Claims Preliminary Pact between U.S. and Mexico ‘Maybe the Largest Trade Deal Ever,” The New York Times, August 27, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/27/us/politics/fact-check-trump-nafta-mexico.html.

2. Mexico’s wages in the manufacturing sector, in U.S. dollars, have remained steady for the last decade, at about US$2.5 an hour. That is significantly more than Mexico’s minimum wage but considerably lower than U.S. manufacturing wages. See https://tradingeconomics.com/mexico/wages-in-manufacturing.

3. NAFTA Secretariat, Overview of the Dispute Settlement Provisions, https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Dispute-Settlement/Overview-of-the-Dispute-Settlement-Provisions.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2018 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Mexico Flag
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Report

Mexico Country Outlook 2023

Read More
Rio Grande
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Report

Treaty and Non-Treaty Mechanisms for Resolving the Rio Grande River Water Debt Dilemma

Read More
Hand types on laptop keyboard, with icons and symbols extruded from the screen; future tech, AI concept
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Journal

A Social Network Analysis of Mexico’s Dark Network Alliance Structure

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy