Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Child at border plays in the dirt with superhero toy
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain on the left
    Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Thu, Mar. 02, 2023 | 11:30 am - 1:30 pm
    How Kuwait and Other Gulf Oil Giants Are Navigating the Energy Transition See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Conflict Resolution and U.S. Foreign Policy | Issue Brief

Unilateral West Bank Annexation: A Hazardous Voyage

November 4, 2019 | Gilead Sher, Daniel Cohen

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Gilead Sher
Isaac and Mildred Brochstein Fellow in Middle East Peace and Security in Honor of Yitzhak Rabin
Daniel Cohen
Intern, Center for the Middle East

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Sher, Gilead, and Daniel Cohen. 2019. Unilateral West Bank Annexation by Israel: A Hazardous Voyage. Baker Institute Report no. 11.04.19. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

Tags

Baker InstituteIsraelWest Bank

The two-state-for-two-people vision for Israel and Palestine has long been proposed as a partition of the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea into two nation-states: Israel, on roughly 78% of the land, and a Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, comprising 22% of the land.1 Today, this vision seems increasingly distant, as the way forward has become muddled by incremental de facto Israeli annexation in the West Bank, outbreaks of Palestinian terror and violence, and a complete breakdown of trust on both sides. Yet a two-state reality is essential for attaining a democratic Jewish national home in Eretz Yisrael2 within secure and recognized boundaries. The Zionist enterprise never endeavored to rule over another people, let alone for more than half a century.

More than ever, drawing a border between two nation-states, even a provisional one, is an urgent priority— especially for preserving the progress of the Oslo negotiations. The Oslo process resulted in two significant milestones: mutual recognition between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1993 (the Oslo I Accord), and an interim self-government agreement signed in 1995 (the Oslo II Accord) that established the Palestinian Authority and the division of the West Bank into Areas A, B, and C. The Tel Aviv Institute for National Security Studies has a comprehensive political and military plan3 for embarking toward a reality of two distinct political entities. Among other things, it suggests drawing a provisional border that would encompass the large blocks of settlements comprising ~75% of settlers without annexing any West Bank territory until a final agreement is attained.

Rather than moving toward a two-state vision, however, recent legislative efforts and public discourse in Israel have increasingly trended toward unilateral annexation of West Bank territory. West Bank annexation threatens a dangerous Israeli decline into a disastrous reality of one state, which will either comprise a nonJewish majority or will be non-democratic and lacking equality between its inhabitants; it would perpetually be on the verge of civil war. Such a process will have pernicious and lasting consequences, leading Israel to an unprecedented crisis of delegitimization, enhanced demonization, and isolation.

Annexation could come in many forms: annexing only the largest “consensus” settlement blocs (Gush Etzion, Ma’ale Adumim, Givat Ze’ev, the Jordan Valley, etc.), most or all of the Jewish settlements and outposts in Area C, all of Area C, or even the entire West Bank.4 No matter the geographic extent, annexation will initiate a perilous and nearly irreversible process, endangering Israel on numerous fronts. The country will face international reprisals, a cooling of diplomatic relations with global and regional allies, and a diminished economic outlook. The inroads of Oslo will be all but undone, undermining the territorial viability of a future Palestinian state and jeopardizing the security and civil coordination with the Palestinian Authority.

President Donald Trump has upended decades of U.S. foreign policy, which previously sought a solution of two states for two peoples through a process compliant with UN Security Resolutions 242 and 338 and based on a “land for peace” principle. Thus, Israeli protagonists of annexation have sensed a historic opportunity. Trump’s 2018 relocation of the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and his 2019 proclamation recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights have both signaled strong support for Israel. In addition, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, has commented that Israel has the right to “retain parts of the West Bank.”5 The White House is further indifferent to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's campaign commitment to annex the Jordan Valley after the last Israeli elections, while the Trump administration has also taken drastic diplomatic and financial measures visà-vis the Palestinian Authority. In that context, the “political” portion of Trump’s “Deal of the Century”—a long-awaited deal for IsraeliPalestinian peace about which little is known— is unlikely to gain traction once released.6

Nevertheless, while a supportive Trump administration might empower Israel to begin enacting annexationist policies, it may not remain comfortably allied with Israel as the fallout ensues. It is unlikely that the U.S. will condone applying Israeli sovereignty over all Jewish settlements in the West Bank, as Netanyahu has suggested.7 There also remains the looming danger that any future Democratic U.S. leadership, which will almost certainly support a two-state vision, will reject Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank (except for an equal swap of lands and within the context of a negotiated agreement)—and perhaps reverse Trump’s Golan Heights decision. Thus, any Israeli action undertaken with Trump’s assurances will be under question, and Israel could find itself facing international hostility without American support.

Moreover, it will be nearly impossible to turn back once the process of annexation begins, due to the 2014 “Basic Law: Referendum,” passed by the Israeli Knesset.8 According to the law, any Israeli government seeking to remove Israeli jurisdiction from territory in which it already applies—such as the Golan Heights or annexed West Bank territory—must receive the approval of at least 80 of 120 Knesset members or, alternatively, 61 members of the Knesset and 50% public support by way of a general referendum. Thus, any annexed territory will be extremely difficult to reverse, given the high threshold of legislative and public support required.

There are also significant international and diplomatic risks of annexing West Bank territory, especially for Israel’s regional ties. Regarding Jordan and Egypt, the only two Arab nations with which Israel has a peace agreement, annexation will greatly challenge normalized relations, especially with Jordan. Annexation will increase the Hashemite Kingdom’s fears of becoming a de jure or, ultimately, de facto “Palestinian state.”9 As public and political pressure intensifies in Jordan to terminate the 1994 Israel-Jordan peace accord, Israeli annexation will only increase chances for a collapse of the treaty, particularly in the wake of King Abdullah II’s 2018 decision not to renew a 25-year-old land use agreement that was established as part of the accord.10

Israel’s growing relationship with many Sunni Arab states will also diminish in the event of West Bank annexation. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and other Gulf states have been discreetly strengthening security ties to Israel, insofar as their strategic interests align regarding the Iranian threat. Nevertheless, Sunni Arab leaders remain beholden to the sentiments of their political bases, and Israel should expect a chilly reception if the Palestinian conflict remains relevant. In recent years, many Arab states have been less eager to issue Palestinian rallying cries, but steps toward Israeli annexation of West Bank territory will prompt Sunni Arabs to flock to the cause once again.

Naturally, the Palestinians will react most harshly to any Israeli overtures toward annexation. Unilaterally asserting sovereignty in parts of the West Bank will likely prove a lethal blow to hopes for an eventual two-state solution, as well as any power vested in the Palestinian Authority. The prospect of Palestinian uprisings in Gaza and the West Bank without the benefit of Palestinian Authority security forces will require the Israel Defense Forces to further deploy military forces in the West Bank, perhaps even doubling its presence.11 A resurgence of Palestinian violence will also demand further security checkpoints and roadblocks, and perhaps eventually even reinstating a military administration in Areas A and B, creating constant and unsustainable friction in the freshly annexed territory. Since the Second Intifada from 2000-2005, Israel has contended with pockets of violent terror, but annexation may incite a sustained and widely coordinated Palestinian uprising.

A healthy democracy in this reality is inconceivable. Unless Israel were to offer citizenship including, inter alia, voting rights to every Palestinian under its jurisdiction, any extension of sovereignty or control will lead to an apartheid-like system that tears at the moral fabric of the Jewish state. Palestinians and the international community will soon come to realize that annexation is a permanent reality, and they will most probably demand that Israel either return the land in a negotiated agreement or offer full rights to all its citizens.

Compromising Israel’s Jewish-democratic character by jeopardizing the Jewish majority encompassed within the country’s borders is unacceptable to most Jewish Israelis, but so is controlling the daily lives of the Palestinians without equal rights. Israelis must choose to either disengage or fully integrate with the Palestinians. Annexation is not a valid alternative.

Endnotes

1. This issue brief is based on a previous report: Gilead Sher and Daniel Cohen, The Repercussions of Partial or Full West Bank Annexation by Israel (Houston: Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, September 2019), https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/repercussions-partial-or-fullwest-bank-annexation-israel/.

2. “The Land of Israel” in Hebrew.

3. Amos Yadlin, Udi Dekel, and Kim Lavi, “A Strategic Framework for the IsraeliPalestinian Arena,” Institute for National Security Studies, March 2019, https:// www.inss.org.il/publication/strategicframework-israeli-palestinian-arena/.

4. The Israeli-Palestinian Interim SelfGovernment Agreement signed in 1995 (the Oslo II Accord) established, inter alia, a plan to create the Palestinian Authority. It also divided the West Bank into Areas A, B, and C, with Area A under full Palestinian control, and Area B under Palestinian civil control and an overriding security authority for Israel. Together, these areas made up roughly 40% of the West Bank, with Israel-controlled Area C accounting for the remaining 60%. This arrangement was meant to last for a maximum 5 years, during which time the two sides would negotiate a final agreement.

5. David M. Halbfinger, “U.S. Ambassador Says Israel Has Right to Annex Parts of West Bank,” The New York Times, June 8, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/08/ world/middleeast/israel-west-bank-davidfriedman.html.

6. Michael J. Koplow, “The Deal of the Century’s Audacious Bets,” Israel Policy Forum, May 23, 2019, https:// israelpolicyforum.org/2019/05/23/thedeal-of-the-centurys-audacious-bets/.

7. David M. Halbfinger, “Netanyahu Vows to Start Annexing West Bank, in Bid to Rally the Right,” The New York Times, April 6, 2019, https://www.nytimes. com/2019/04/06/world/middleeast/ netanyahu-annex-west-bank.html.

8. Joel Singer, “Trump’s Recognition of Israeli Sovereignty in the Golan Heights and Netanyahu’s Promise to Annex the Jewish Settlements in the West Bank – Poison Pills to Middle East Peace,” Joel Singer, May 16, 2019, https://www.joelsinger.org/trumpsrecognition-of-israeli-sovereignty-in-thegolan-heights-and-netanyahus-promise-toannex-the-jewish-settlements-in-the-westbank-poison-pills-to-middle-east-peace/.

9. Curtis Ryan, “Jordanians Worry That the ‘Deal of the Century’ Will Come at Their Expense,” Washington Post, June 1, 2019, https://beta.washingtonpost.com/ politics/2019/06/01/jordanians-worrythat-deal-century-will-come-theirexpense/.

10. Gilead Sher and Mor Ben-Kalifa, “Challenge to the Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty,” Institute for National Security Studies, October 29, 2018, https://www.inss.org.il/ publication/challenge-israel-jordan-peacetreaty/.

11. Commanders for Israel’s Security, Ramifications of West Bank Annexation: Security and Beyond (Commanders for Israel’s Security and Israel Policy Forum, 2018), 19, https://israelpolicyforum.org/ annexation/.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

 

© 2019 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/WB6P-4809
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Asylum documents
Women’s Rights, Human Rights and Refugees | Policy Brief

How Biden’s New Border Policy Hurts Asylum Seekers

Read More
Oil rig
Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Research Paper

How Economic and Political Factors Drive the Oil Strategy of Gulf Arab States

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy