The Trump Tariff Ruling, the De Minimis Exemption, and an Economy Losing Steam
Table of Contents
Author(s)
John W. Diamond
Edward A. and Hermena Hancock Kelly Senior Fellow in Public Finance | Director, Center for Tax and Budget PolicyAbout the Episode
John W. Diamond breaks down three major developments. First, a federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump unlawfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose his sweeping tariffs. Second, a new executive order from Trump eliminates the de minimis exemption, which had allowed imports worth $800 or less to enter the country tax-free. Third, new jobs numbers show a weakening labor market.
This conversation was recorded on Sept. 3, 2025.
Subscribe and listen to “The Two-Handed Economist” on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Clips used in this episode:
- “BREAKING: U.S. appeals court rules Trump's global tariffs are illegal,” NBC News, August 29, 2025.
- “‘US will be destroyed if…,’” Economic Times, September 1, 2025.
- “Trump ends tariff exemption for low-value packages,” CNN, August 29, 2025.
- “US July Jolts Report: Job openings fall by 176,000,” Bloomberg Television, September 3, 2025.
About ‘The Two-Handed Economist’
“The Two-Handed Economist” delivers timely analysis of economic news from John Diamond, director of the Baker Institute Center for Tax and Budget Policy. Each week, John dives deep into the latest policy developments — mostly at the federal level, but with insights now and again into Texas and Houston finance as well.
Why a two-handed economist, you might ask? President Harry Truman famously asked for a one-handed economist, tired of hearing, “On the one hand, this,” and “On the other hand, that.” John embraces the complexity that a one-handed economist might shy away from, explaining how it all adds up for consumers, businesses, and policymakers.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.