Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    USMCA Flags
    Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico
    Thu, July 09, 2026 | 10 am - 11 am
    The State of Negotiations of the USMCA See Details
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Science and Technology Policy | Journal

The Importance of Science Advocacy

May 6, 2012 | Kenny Evans, Kirstin R.W. Matthews
A science conference.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kenny Evans

Fellow in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

To access the full article, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

U.S. leadership in global science and technology (S&T) stands as one of America's greatest traditions of the 20th century. In the past, most notably after World War II and the advent of the Cold War, leadership in the scientific world was often synonymous with a powerful global presence and a successful, progressive society. In recent years, shifting political priorities of policymakers and the American public have begun to eat away at federal funding opportunities for U.S. research and development (R&D). The continuing national debt crisis, coupled with the moral and ideological concerns surrounding several of the more prominent R&D issues (i.e., climate change, stem cells, energy policy), have pushed U.S. funding for S&T below a quickly rising global standard. In the face of a persistent decline and stagnation in R&D funding, scientists and engineers must devote more time and effort toward keeping the economic and societal value of science in the public eye and advocate for it to hold a higher standing in the federal budget.

Published in The Journal of Science Policy & Governance.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Modern Medical Research Laboratory, Young Scientists Using Microscope, Digital Tablet, Doing Sample Analysis, Talking. Diverse Team of Specialists work in Advanced Lab.
Science and Technology Policy | Commentary

Reimagining Science Education To Build Capacity for Collaboration

Read More
Server racks in computer network security server room data center, 3d rendering. Downloaded Server racks in computer network security server room data center
Science and Technology Policy | Commentary

Techno-Optimism, Techno-Pessimism, and Techno-Realism

Read More
A Doctor Wearing a Stethoscope and a Puzzle Piece Heart Pin.
Center for Health Policy | Science and Technology Policy | Working Paper

Reframing Autism: Considerations for a Biomedicine Roadmap

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy