Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Map of the Middle East
    Wed, June 10, 2026 | 5 pm - 6:45 pm
    The Middle East and US Foreign Policy: What Happens Next? See Details
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
International Economics | Working Paper

The Plaza Accord, 30 Years Later

September 16, 2015 | Jeffrey Frankel
International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Jeffrey Frankel

Harpel Professor of Capital Formation and Growth, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteInternational economicsCurrencyPlaza accord

To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

Abstract

The paper reviews an event of 30 years ago from the perspective of today: a successful G-5 initiative to reverse what had been a dangerously overvalued dollar. The “Plaza Accord” is best viewed not as the precise product of the meeting on September 22, 1985, but as shorthand for a historic change in US policy that began when James Baker became Treasury Secretary in January of that year. The change had the desired effect, bringing down the dollar and reducing the trade deficit. In recent years concerted foreign exchange intervention, of the sort undertaken by the G-7 in 1985 and periodically over the subsequent decade, has died out. Indeed the G-7 in 2013, fearing “currency manipulation,” specifically agreed to refrain from intervention in a sort of “anti-Plaza accord.” But the day will come when coordinated foreign exchange intervention is again appropriate.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2015 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Rendering of World Trade Organization delegates finalizing international trade agreements
International Economics | Issue Brief

Unfinished Business: Bringing China Into the Club of Market-Oriented Countries

Read More
North America economic growth
International Economics | Claudio X. González Center for the US and Mexico | Commentary

A New Chapter in Trade: Preparing for the Landmark Review of the USMCA

Read More
China trade relations
International Economics | Commentary

Beyond US Unilateralism: Rethinking the Response to China’s Trade Practices

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy