A New Taxonomy of Nearshoring: Strategic Trends in Global Value Chain Reconfiguration
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Roberto Durán-Fernández
Nonresident Scholar
Ernesto Stein
Professor, School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey
Roberto Durán-Fernández
Nonresident Scholar at the Center for the U.S. and Mexico; Professor, School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey
Share this Publication
- Download PDF
- Print This Publication
- Cite This Publication Copy Citation
Roberto Duran-Fernandez and Ernesto Stein, “A New Taxonomy of Nearshoring: Strategic Trends in Global Value Chain Reconfiguration,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, January 10, 2025, https://doi.org/10.25613/HPHS-ZN35.
Abstract
This article explores the evolving phenomenon of nearshoring within the context of global value chain (GVC) reconfiguration, driven by geopolitical shifts, economic disruptions, and sustainability goals. It introduces a new taxonomy to classify nearshoring activities based on capital origin and project type, distinguishing between foreign and domestic investments and categorizing projects as either new developments or expansions of existing infrastructure. Using Mexico as a case study, the article examines the interplay of trends such as rising labor costs in Asia, protectionist policies, and the pursuit of supply chain resilience. By highlighting strategic investment patterns and policy implications, the study provides insights into the opportunities and challenges nearshoring presents for Latin America and its integration into the global economy.
View the full paper (PDF).
This publication was produced on behalf of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, this material was reviewed by external experts prior to release. It has not undergone editorial review. Any errors are the responsibility of the author(s) alone.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.