Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Child at border plays in the dirt with superhero toy
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain on the left
    Center for Energy Studies | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Thu, Mar. 02, 2023 | 11:30 am - 1:30 pm
    How Kuwait and Other Gulf Oil Giants Are Navigating the Energy Transition See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Public Finance | Testimony

The Economic and Fiscal Benefits of Pro-growth Policies

June 7, 2017 | John W. Diamond
US Capitol

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Head shot of public finance fellow John Diamond
John W. Diamond
Edward A. and Hermena Hancock Kelly Fellow in Public Finance | Director, Center for Public Finance
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker Institutetaxesnational debt

Video of Diamond's Testimony

Written Statement

Chairwoman Black, Ranking Member Yarmuth, and Members of the Committee, it is an honor to present my views on the economic and fiscal benefits of pro-growth policies.

Growth is important in determining the future size of the economy and the standard of living. Small changes in growth can have a significant impact on the size of the economy. For example, an increase in the growth rate from 2.0 percent to 2.5 percent would increase the size of the economy by 28 percent in 10 years, and reduce the time required to double the size of the economy by seven years, from 35 to 28 years. Accordingly, policies that increase the growth rate of the economy by a small amount can have significant impacts in the long term.

Enacting pro-growth policies is particularly important at this time for two reasons. First, U.S. fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path, with deficits and debts projected to continue to grow dramatically as the baby boom generation ages and transitions from work to retirement, thus decreasing the ratio of the number of workers to retirees while increasing public expenditures on retirement and healthcare programs. The Congressional Budget Office (hereafter CBO, 2017) reports that retirement and healthcare expenditures are expected to increase faster than GDP because the population is aging (which accounts for 3.5 percent of the increase in expenditures) and the average price of health care services is increasing faster than GDP (which accounts for 2.9 percent of the increase in expenditures). Second, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the future growth rate of the American economy. One view is that continued innovation will spur productivity growth in the coming decades as new technologies lead to significant increases in output per person. However, another view is that the recent advances in technology have not led to significant and lasting increases in productivity, and that in addition the U.S. economy is facing a number of impediments that may reduce the growth rate of real GDP per person below the levels of 2.4 percent per year that characterized the period 1920–1970 or even the growth rate of 1.8 percent per year from 1970–2014 (Gordon, 2016). Gordon projects that from 2015–2040 the growth in real GDP per person could be as low as 0.8 percent per year. The major impediments to future growth rates include large and growing debts at the federal, state and local levels, demographic changes such as the population aging noted previously, the growth and accumulation of regulatory policy, and slower gains in educational achievement. In addition, rising inequality, changes in family structure and other social indicators, as well as the effects of globalization, including increased competition from abroad, may also dampen future growth rates.

The current path of U.S. fiscal policy is unsustainable. CBO (2017) projects that total spending will increase as a share of GDP from 20.7 percent in 2017 to 29.3 percent in 2047, and total revenue is projected to increase as a share of GDP from 17.8 percent in 2017 to 19.6 percent in 2047. The federal debt is projected to increase as a share of GDP from 77 percent in 2017 to 150 percent in 2047. As noted above, demographic changes are driving much of the increase in federal spending with the remaining increase related to rising interest payments on the national debt.

Table 1 — The Federal Budget Under the Extended Baseline

This table lists data from the Federal Budget.
Source  Congressional Budget Office, The 2017 Long-Term Budget Outlook.

The obvious conclusion is that the projected expenditure increases in the United States are unsustainable and fiscal restraint is imperative. The United States must reduce the projected level of expenditures and reform its tax system to reduce economic distortions and maximize economic growth. Tax reform should include a focus on limiting government expenditures that occur through the tax system. Otherwise, the combination of rising a debt level and a relatively distortionary tax system will significantly hamper economic growth more so than has already occurred.

These developments have not gone unnoticed, as numerous proposals for fiscal and tax reform have emerged, with tax reforms ranging from base broadening, rate reducing reforms to consumption-based tax reforms. An outline of the first approach was put forward by the co-chairs of President Obama’s 2010 fiscal commission, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson. They issued a report, A Path Forward to Securing America’s Future, which included $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction, including a reform of both the corporate and individual income tax systems.

There is in particular a strong case for business tax reform. The last major reform was the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Since that time, however, many countries have reformed their tax structures, lowering statutory rates while removing tax preferences. As a result, the United States now has the highest statutory corporate tax rate in the industrialized world.

Proponents of corporate tax reform argue that high tax rates discourage investment and capital accumulation and thus reduce productivity and economic growth. In addition, the combination of a high statutory tax rate coupled with a wide variety of tax preferences distorts the allocation of investment across asset types and industries and reduces the productivity of the nation’s assets, while exacerbating the many inefficiencies of the corporate income tax, including distortions of business decisions regarding the method of finance and organizational form (corporate vs. non-corporate), and the mix of retentions, dividends paid, and share repurchases.

There is also widespread discontent with the individual income tax system. High individual tax rates coupled with a multitude of tax preferences distort decisions regarding labor supply, saving, and consumption; they also significantly complicate tax administration and compliance while encouraging tax avoidance and evasion. Moreover, many tax preferences are poorly designed. For example, the home mortgage interest deduction’s primary purpose is to encourage home ownership. It is poorly designed to achieve this goal, as it offers little or nothing to low- and middle-income individuals who do not itemize, have total deductions that are less than or roughly equal to the standard deduction, or are subject to relatively low marginal tax rates. Instead, the vast majority of the benefits of the home mortgage interest deduction accrue to high-income taxpayers, encouraging overconsumption of housing at the expense of investment in the rest of the economy.

Studies by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008), Viard and Diamond (2008), and the Joint Committee on Taxation (2005) show that the corporate tax is the most harmful tax instrument to economic growth, followed by individual income taxes. While tax reductions in the form of increased personal exemptions, deductions, and credits are likely to reduce long-run growth. Thus, policymakers should adopt a tax system characterized by low capital and labor income tax rates, and minimal tax expenditures.

In fact, serious consideration should be given to a more fundamental reform of the tax structure – adopting a consumption- rather than income-based tax. However, if consumption-based tax reform is not feasible, current personal income tax provisions that encourage saving should be maintained but simplified, and serious consideration should be given to reducing the burden of the corporate income tax on investment income.

Demographic changes are also a major impediment to economic growth in the future because the retirement of the baby boom generation will further reduce the labor force participation rate. Aaronson et al. (2014) find that about half of the change in the labor force participation rate since 2007 is related to an aging population. This effect will continue to dampen the economic growth rate over the next two decades.

Another important impediment to growth is the accumulation of government regulations. Excessive regulation of the U.S. economy is likely slowing growth and limiting risk taking. The regulatory burden affects a wide range of markets, including the market for prescription drugs, the labor market through licensing requirements and the implicit taxes in the Affordable Care Act, the energy market, the financial services sector, and many others. For example, Mulligan (2015) argues that the Affordable Care Act will reduce employment and hours worked by 3 percent and labor income and GDP by 2 percent. Dawson and Seater (2013) find that regulation added since 1949 is responsible for decreasing the size of the U.S. economy by 28 percent as of 2005. They argue that their results explain much of the decline in productivity growth in the 1970s. Haidar (2012) finds that “each business regulatory reform is associated with a 0.15 percent increase in growth rate of GDP.” Coffey, McLaughlin, Peretton (2016) find that since 1980 the cumulative effect of regulations reduced economic growth by 0.8 percent. While the exact cost of regulation in terms of reduced growth is uncertain, the growing number of regulations is almost certainly a hindrance to economic growth and a major reform of regulatory law is overdue.

The slowing growth in educational attainment is also likely to impede economic growth in the future relative to the past 50 years. Achieving the educational gains from that period will be nearly impossible. In addition, other factors such as rising inequality and break downs in family structure and social capital are likely to impede the growth of educational attainment. Reforming and re-organizing the education system is necessary to maximize future growth rates. Finally, increased competition from a continuing trend toward globalization (and to some extent immigration) will likely continue be a drag on the income growth of the lower- and middle-income cohorts in the United States. While both globalization and immigration can have positive growth impacts there are also winners and losers from the disruptions they cause to the U.S. economy.

Policymakers should focus on reducing the government debt through spending restraint, reforming and reducing entitlement programs, reprioritizing other expenditure items to fit in a sustainable budget, and minimizing marginal tax rates while reforming expenditures that occur through the tax system.

References

Aaronson, Stephanie, Tomaz Cajner, Bruce Fallick, Felix Galbis-Reig, Christopher Smith, and William Wascher, 2013. “Labor Force Participation: Recent Developments and Future Prospects,” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 14-10.

Bowles, Erskine and Alan Simpson, 2013. “A Bipartisan Path Forward to Securing America’s Future,” http://www.momentoftruthproject.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Plan%20of%20Securing% 20America's%20Future.pdf

Coffey, Bentley, Patrick McLaughlin, and Pietro Peretton, 2016. “The Cumulative Cost of Regulations,” Mercatus Center Working Paper, April.

Congressional Budget Office, 2017. The Long-Term Budget Outlook. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.

Dawson, John, and John Seater, 2013. “Federal regulation and aggregate economic growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, 18(2), 137–177.

Diamond, John W., and Alan D. Viard, 2008. “Welfare and Macroeconomic Effects of Deficit–Financed Tax Cuts: Lessons from CGE Models.” In Viard, Alan D. (ed.), Tax Policy Lessons from the 2000s, 145–193. The AEI Press, Washington, DC.

Gordon, Robert J., 2015. The Rise and Fall of American Economic Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton University Press.

Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim, 2012. “The Impact of Business Regulatory Reforms on Economic Growth,” Journal of Japanese International Economies, 26, 285–307.

Joint Committee on Taxation, 2005. “Macroeconomic Analysis of Various Proposals to Provide $500 Billion in Tax Relief,” JCX–4–05, March 1.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2008. “Taxes and Economic Growth,” Economics Department Working Paper No. 620. http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/41000592.pdf.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Woman Bills
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Recent U.S. Consumer Trends: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed — Should We Be Blue?

Read More
Covid Graph
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Assessing Recession Risk in a Post-pandemic Economy

Read More
Texas Capitol
Center for Public Finance | Commentary

Politicians in Texas Could be Using Anticipation Notes to Fund Projects Taxpayers Don’t Want

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy