Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Costs of Compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act

September 6, 2019 | Thomas Hogan

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Thomas Hogan
Former Fellow, Center for Public Finance

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Hogan, Thomas L. 2019. Costs of Compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act. Issue brief no. 09.06.19. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

Tags

regulationsDodd-Frankbanking

Introduction

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S. Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“the Dodd-Frank Act”). While the intent of the act was to reduce risk-taking by the largest banks to prevent another financial crisis, many of the regulations were unfairly applied to small banks or had other unintended consequences.

In every year since, Congress has proposed and debated bills to reform the Dodd-Frank Act. One of the most important questions in those debates is if, and to what degree, Dodd-Frank increased the costs of regulatory compliance for U.S. banks. In a recent paper, my coauthor Scott Burns and I estimate the effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on U.S. bank expenses.1 This brief summarizes three key findings of that study:

  • Banks’ total noninterest expenses increased by an average of more than $50 billion per year after the passage of Dodd-Frank.
  • Increases occurred both in salary expenses from hiring new workers and in non-salary expenses such as auditing, consulting, and legal fees.
  • Smaller banks were disproportionately affected by larger increases in salary and non-salary expenses.

The Dodd-Frank Act

Enacted July 10, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act is, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, “the most comprehensive set of reforms to our financial system since the Great Depression.”2 The act made sweeping changes throughout the financial regulatory system including new regulations for systemically important financial institutions (Title I), a new framework for liquidating failing financial companies (Title II), added rules for the insurance (Title V) and mortgage (Title XIV) markets as well as new agencies for financial research (Title I) and consumer protection (Title X). This single act created more regulations than all other legislation under the Obama administration combined, making it what “may be the biggest law ever.”3

Figure 1 shows two measures of the number of regulations that apply to U.S. banks. The black, dashed line is the number of pages in the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Title 12 on Banks and Banking from 2000 to 2017. The orange line shows the number of regulatory restrictions in CFR Title 12 from 1995 to 2016 according to the RegData database, which counts the number of restrictions in regulatory texts based on words such as “must” and “must not” or “shall” and “shall not.”4

FIGURE 1 — MEASURES OF REGULATIONS IN CFR TITLE 12 ON BANKS AND BANKING, 1995-2017

Graph of regulatory restrictions on banks and banking from 1995-2017
SOURCE: Code of Federal Regulations Title 12, RegData

 

As seen in Figure 1, the years following the Dodd-Frank Act show a massive increase in banking regulations. The number of regulatory restrictions increased from 28,875 in 2009 to 53,974 by 2016, and the number of pages in CFR Title 12 increased from 5,065 in 2009 to 9,601 in 2017. By these measures, Dodd-Frank almost doubled the number of regulations applied to U.S. banks.

Costs of Compliance

Have increases in regulation affected bank expenses? Regulators argue that banks’ compliance costs have not increased,6 while critics, such as former National Economic Council director Gary Cohn, claim they amount to “literally hundreds of billions of dollars of regulatory costs every year.”7 In our recent paper “Has Dodd–Frank affected bank expenses?” published in the Journal of Regulatory Economics, my coauthor Scott Burns and I find that the truth lies somewhere in between.

Regulatory costs typically affect banks’ noninterest expenses, such as hiring new compliance officers or bringing in outside lawyers or consultants. Our analysis finds that total noninterest expenses in the banking system increased after 2010 by an estimated $64.5 billion per year, ranging from a low-end estimated increase of $58.7 billion to a high end of $86.1 billion per year.

We can break these estimates down by bank size and by the types of expenses. We separate banks into two groups: “large” banks with $10 billion or more in total assets and “small” banks with assets less than $10 billion.8 We break noninterest expenses into separate categories for salary expenses of hiring new workers and non-salary expenses such as consulting and legal fees that might be related to regulatory compliance.

Table 1 shows the results of this breakdown. We see that salary and non-salary expenses increased for both large and small banks. Although the dollar amounts are bigger for large banks, the percentage increases are bigger for small banks, which make up only about 10% of total assets in the banking system.

TABLE 1 — EXPENSE INCREASES AT LARGE AND SMALL BANKS (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR)

Table of expense increases at large and small banks
SOURCE: Hogan and Burns (2019, pp.226-228)

 

The increases in salary expenses are closely tied to increases in the number of regulations, while increases in non-salary expenses are mostly a one-time event after the passage of Dodd-Frank. Banks began to hire lawyers and consultants when Dodd-Frank was first passed in anticipation of coming regulations, but they did not begin hiring additional full-time employees until the new regulations went into effect.

Non-Salary Expenses

We can also test for increases in four subcategories of non-salary expenses: legal fees, data processing, auditing, and consulting expenses. Table 2 shows the increases for large and small banks in each of these subcategories. Large banks spent an additional $12.42 billion per year on legal fees and $7.04 billion on data processing relative to before the Dodd-Frank Act. Changes in auditing and consulting expenses are not statistically significant. The category “other” expenses, calculated as non-salary expenses from Table 1 minus the other subcategories, makes up roughly half of the total.

TABLE 2 — INCREASES IN SUBCATEGORIES OF NON-SALARY EXPENSES (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR)

Increases in subcategories of non-salary expenses
SOURCE Author’s calculations based on Hogan and Burns (2019).

 

Small banks experienced statistically significant increases after Dodd-Frank in all four categories of non-salary expenses. They spent almost $1 billion more per year on legal fees. They increased annual spending on data processing, auditing, and consulting by roughly $310 million, $70 million, and $110 million respectively, and they spent an additional $3.85 billion per year on other non-salary expenses relative to before Dodd-Frank. Compared to large banks, increases in small banks’ non-salary expenses were bigger and more likely to be statistically significant.

Conclusions

The Dodd-Frank act roughly doubled the number of regulations applied to U.S. banks, which increased their compliance costs by more than $50 billion per year. Banks experienced a one-time increase in non-salary expenses, while their salary expenses increased in proportion to new regulations. Small banks experienced disproportionate increases in salary expenses as well as significant increases in auditing, consulting, data processing, and legal fees. U.S. regulators and policymakers may wish to consider these results when developing future regulatory policies.

Endnotes

1. Thomas L. Hogan and Scott Burns, “Has Dodd–Frank affected bank expenses?” Journal of Regulatory Economics (2019) 55: 214-236.

2. Department of the Treasury, The Dodd–Frank act: Reforming wall street and protecting main street, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury, January 2017.

3. Patrick McLaughlin and Oliver Sherouse, “The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act May Be the Biggest Law Ever,” Mercatus Center at George Mason University, July 20, 2015.

4. Omar Al-Ubaydli and Patrick A. McLaughlin, “RegData: A numerical database on industry-specific regulations for all United States industries and federal regulations, 1997–2012,” Regulation and Governance 11(2017): 109–123.

5. Data available online at https:// quantgov.org/regdata-us/.

6. See, for example, Roisin McCord and Edward Simpson Prescott, “The financial crisis, the collapse of the banking industry, and changes in the size and distribution of banks,” Economic Quarterly, 100(1), 23–50. 2014; and Government Accountability Office, Dodd–Frank regulations: Impacts on community banks, credit unions and systemically important institutions, Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office, 2015.

7. Quoted in Michael C. Bender and Damian Paletta, “Donald Trump Plans to Undo Dodd-Frank Law, Fiduciary Rule,” Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2017.

8. Results are similar when the size categories are divided into large banks (assets > $50 billion), regional banks ($10-50 billion in assets), small banks ($1-10 billion in assets), and community banks (assets < $1 billion)

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2019 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/x0s4-mc85
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Covid Graph
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Assessing Recession Risk in a Post-pandemic Economy

Read More
Texas Capitol
Center for Public Finance | Commentary

Politicians in Texas Could be Using Anticipation Notes to Fund Projects Taxpayers Don’t Want

Read More
Bitcoins lie on an income tax form.
Center for Public Finance | Issue Brief

Paying Your Taxes in Bitcoin? Maybe Not So Fast

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy