What Can We Expect From the 2026 USMCA Review?
Table of Contents
Author(s)
David A. Gantz
Will Clayton Fellow in Trade and International EconomicsSimon Lester
Nonresident FellowTony Payan
Claudio X. Gonzalez Fellow in U.S.-Mexico Studies | Françoise and Edward Djerejian Fellow for Mexico Studies | Director, Claudio X. González Center for the U.S. and MexicoAbout the Episode
On July 1, negotiators will begin the formal review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a trade pact affecting billions of dollars in commerce and tens of millions of workers across North America. What priorities will each country bring to the table, and how likely is a consensus to extend the agreement for another 16 years?
Ahead of the 2026 USMCA review, center experts David A. Gantz and Simon Lester joined the “Baker Briefing” podcast to discuss the negotiating landscape — one shaped by trade tensions, tariff policy, and evolving political dynamics across North America.
This conversation was recorded on June 22, 2026.
Listen and subscribe to “Baker Briefing” on Apple, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
Mentioned in this episode:
- David A. Gantz, “United States’ Objectives as the USMCA Negotiations Begin,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, June 2, 2026.
- David A. Gantz and Tony Payan, “Strategic Priorities for the 2026 USMCA Review,” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, December 2, 2025.
About Baker Briefing
Hosted by David M. Satterfield, the “Baker Briefing” podcast delivers timely analysis on breaking policy developments and other critical policy issues of the day in conversations with experts at the Baker Institute. New episodes are released weekly.
Select episodes of “Baker Briefing” are recorded in front of a live audience at Rice University in Houston, Texas. These recordings are free and open to the public. To learn about upcoming recordings and other public programming from the Baker Institute, subscribe to our “Events Digest” newsletter, delivered weekly.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.