Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Gas Geoeconomics: A Strategy to Harden European Partners Against Russian Energy Coercion

February 12, 2021 | Gabriel Collins, Anna Mikulska
Gas powerplants with steam coming out.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Gabriel Collins
Baker Botts Fellow in Energy & Environmental Regulatory Affairs
Anna Mikulska
Fellow in Energy Studies

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Collins, Gabriel and Anna Mikulska. 2021. Gas Geoeconomics: A Strategy to Harden European Partners Against Russian Energy Coercion. Policy brief: Recommendations for the New Administration. 02.12.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

This brief is part of a series of policy recommendations for President-elect Joe Biden’s incoming administration. Focusing on a range of important issues facing the country, the briefs are intended to provide decision-makers with relevant and effective ideas for addressing domestic and foreign policy priorities. View the entire series at www.bakerinstitute.org/recommendations-2021.

 

Executive Summary

  • The expiration of many Central and Eastern European (CEE) firms’ long-term natural gas supply contracts with Gazprom creates a window of opportunity for this administration to provide strategic financial support for specific key gas infrastructure projects—a policy we dub “gas geoeconomics.”
  • U.S. backing can accelerate the construction of vital pipeline interconnections and liquefied natural gas (LNG) import options throughout the region, allowing CEE countries to import gas from a greater range of sources, foster deeper market liberalization, and dis-incentivize future long-term gas supply deals with Russian firms.
  • This in turn would blunt Russia’s ability to use gas as an instrument of strategic leverage, afford allied governments greater latitude to confront Russian malign activities, and enhance key European partners’ resilience against Russian energy coercion for decades to come.
  • In addition to the security benefits, promoting gas market liberalization would also create a more level playing field for competitive trade and generate new opportunities for private firms, including those from the U.S.

The Threat

Russian energy supply entities generally operate as fundamentally commercial actors. But under certain circumstances these firms can be—and have been— utilized as instruments of coercive influence acting on behalf of the Russian state.1 Our previous research identified at least 22 discrete instances since 1990 where Russian entities used price and/or physical volume manipulation of crude oil or natural gas supplies—often amid political tensions—to pressure consumers located in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the former Soviet countries.2

The CEE is especially vulnerable to such machinations given the dominance of Russian gas in this region that stems from continued reliance on Soviet-era pipelines, which reduce connectivity with the EU’s West and generally exclude non-Russian gas supply sources. This dependence directly affects U.S. security interests: consider, for instance, Ukraine’s rejection of a 2013 association agreement with the EU amidst Russian pressure exerted in part through gas pricing.3

Gas Geoeconomics Offers a Policy Solution

Yet the tyranny of legacy and installed infrastructure can be flipped in an act of energy security jiujitsu. Circumstances now present Europe with just such an opportunity to invest in supplemental gas pipelines, import terminals, and other facilities to rewire the regional gas infrastructure, diversify inbound gas supplies, and defang Moscow’s ability to use them as a coercive instrument.

In Europe, this effort is already underway—witness the EU’s energy sector “Projects of Common Interest” (PCI) list.4 Nevertheless, selected financial “nudges” from the U.S. can help get projects completed (and security enhanced) sooner. In this context, geoeconomic actions (i.e., using economic instruments to produce beneficial geopolitical results) can offer a minimum cost, maximum payoff for U.S. policy in the region. It is a path to providing political and energy market resilience against any potential use of natural gas for political or economic means by the Russian state that could undercut the energy security of our allies in CEE, all of whom are also either North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members or NATO partner countries.

Gas Geoeconomics Implementation Measures

Physical infrastructure projects can be facilitated through several interrelated financial support options:

Option 1: Provide U.S.-backed “forgivable debt” to finance EU gas infrastructure projects.

Provide loans backed by a consortium of interested countries to support time charters of floating storage and re-gasification units (FSRUs) and construction of essential associated connective infrastructure to get gas into local pipeline networks. If within a pre-negotiated time frame the host country adopts and implements reforms aimed at fostering gas market liberalization, the debt could be forgiven.

Implementation could be measured on the basis of a number of metrics including but not limited to: (1) lifting price controls; (2) physical unbundling of gas production, storage, and transmission infrastructure; (3) the emergence of verified, market-based trading of pipeline capacity; (4) verified, nondiscriminatory third-party access by non-Russian controlled entities to gas pipelines in the country; and (5) trading turnover rates at virtual transfer points or gas hubs associated with the host country’s gas pipeline network.

Option 2: Provide “assured payback” from the U.S. government to private import project developers.

The initial investments would be made with private capital, but if a mutually established rate-of-return target was not met within a prescribed timeframe, U.S.-facilitated funds could be used to compensate the developers for the difference between actual returns and the minimum return negotiated at the project’s inception.

Option 3: Provide preferential project finance loans.

This could be done at London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or LIBOR + 50 basis points and/or by allowing U.S. and EU-affiliated financial institutions to take a larger lending role than is typically the case. Such an approach could be especially useful for projects aimed at initiating the liberalization process in a particular country and showing capital markets that the jurisdiction is being “de-risked” from a gas sector investment perspective.

The positive effects of U.S. involvement could be almost immediate and could help tangibly demonstrate American commitment to multiple European partner states while also helping install the physical hardware needed to underpin European gas security for decades to come.5 Moreover, geoeconomics can complement and ensure the effectiveness of current U.S. initiatives in the region, such as the Department of Defense’s European Deterrence Initiative.6

The Gas Geoeconomics Concept Has Robust Bipartisan Support

Gas geoeconomics concepts find increasing acceptance in both houses of Congress and on a bipartisan basis. In April 2018, the authors published a working paper titled “Gas Geoeconomics in Europe: Using Strategic Investments to Promote Market Liberalization, Counterbalance Russian Revanchism, and Enhance European Energy Security.” By October 2018, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-CT, had introduced Senate Bill 3585, the “European Energy Security and Diversification Act of 2018,” whose core content tracked the authors’ novel gas geoeconomics policy concepts almost word for word and country by country.7 The 2018 bill evolved into Senate Bill 704 (the “European Energy Security and Diversification Act of 2019”) and a House companion bill, H.R. 1616 (introduced by Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-IL), which passed the House in March 2019 by a vote of 391–24. The bill has been received in the Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.8

Increasingly bold Russian malign activities across Europe over the past several years—be they an attempted coup, influence operations, or assassinations (or attempts thereof) that involve use of internationally outlawed chemical weapons—make increased energy resilience an urgent strategic priority. We urge the administration to rapidly engage with Capitol Hill while also taking executive actions to rapidly identify and implement multiple gas geoeconomics projects. If it does so, 2021 can be a year when the U.S. can empower its European allies standing on the frontlines of Russian revanchism while simultaneously creating new markets for U.S. LNG to compete in.

Endnotes

1. Indeed, a 2018 European Parliament report found that “through state-owned Gazprom and Rosneft, Russia has shown a willingness to abuse its dominant market position in support of foreign policy goals, primarily in its immediate neighbourhood but also further afield.” European Parliament Policy Department for External Relations, Directorate General for External Policies of the Union, “Energy as a tool of foreign policy of authoritarian states, in particular Russia,” PE 603.868, April 2018, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603868/EXPO_STU(2018)603868_EN.pdf.

2. Collins, Gabriel. 2017. Russia’s Use of the “Energy Weapon” in Europe. Issue brief no. 07.18.17. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/ac785a2b/BI-Brief-071817-CES_Russia1.pdf.

3. “Ukraine protests after Yanukovych EU deal rejection,” BBC, November 30, 2013, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25162563; see also Ivan Nechpurenko, “Putin Wins Over Ukraine With Gas Deal and $15Bln Bailout,” Moscow Times, December 17, 2013, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2013/12/17/putin-wins-over-ukraine-with-gas-deal-and-15bln-bailout-a30605 (Russia cut gas prices to Ukraine by one-third to help Yanukovych shore up political support in the Eastern industrial region).

4. “Technical information on Projects of Common Interest: accompanying the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/389 final of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 347/2013 of the European Parliament,” European Union, March 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/technical_document_4th_ pci_list.pdf.

5. Gabriel Collins and Anna Mikulska, Trans-Atlantic Gas Diplomacy 2.0: Molecule-indifferent Gas Geoeconomics, Not Energy Sanctions, are the Best Option to Harden Europe Against Russian Gas Coercion, (Houston, Texas: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University, 2020), https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/441a118e/ces-pub-gasgeoeconeurope-100120-3.pdf.

6. “The European Deterrence Initiative: A Budgetary Overview,” Congressional Research Service, June 16, 2020, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF10946.pdf.

7. U.S. Congress, Senate, European Energy Security and Diversification Act of 2018, S. 3585, 115th Congress (2017-2018), https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/3585/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22central+europe+Energy+Security%22%5D%7D&r=56&s=4.

8. U.S. Congress, House, Actions Overview, European Energy Security and Diversification Act of 2019, H.R. 1616, 116th Congress (2019-2020), https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1616/actions?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22European+Energy+Security+and+Diversification+Act%22%5D%7D&r=3&s=1.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/Q2AV-M072
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Gas+Stove
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

Why Gas Stoves Matter to the Climate — and the Gas Industry: Keeping Them Means Homes Will Use Gas for Heating Too

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy