Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Pakistan Flooding
    Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Jan. 26, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Geopolitical Turmoil and Climate Crisis in Pakistan: A Developing Country’s Perspective on Energy and Water Security See Details
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Expanding Carbon Capture in Texas: Working Paper from Stakeholder Discussions on “Collaborative Action to Reduce CO2 Emissions in Texas”

January 27, 2021 | Kenneth B. Medlock III, Keily Miller
Texas refineries at sunset.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kenneth B. Medlock III
James A. Baker, III, and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics | Senior Director, Center for Energy Studies
Keily Miller
Former Research Manager, Center for Energy Studies

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

To access the full working paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

Executive Summary

Opportunity in Texas

Texas is the source of about one-quarter of all energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the US industrial sector and about one-eighth of all CO2 emissions from the US power generation sector, with a significant proportion of emissions in both sectors located near the gulf coast. As such, Texas has the opportunity to capture significant economies of scale in carbon capture. Of course, there must be a viable option for either use or sequestration of CO2 to stimulate investment in capture technologies. Fortunately, Texas is also endowed with tremendous geologic storage potential and a very deep talent pool that is well-versed in the operational and technical demands of the subsurface. This, along with an entrepreneurial and business-friendly environment, gives Texas an inherent advantage as it positions its nascent carbon capture, utilization and/or storage (CCUS) industry for growth and leadership in a rapidly evolving space.

Expanding CCUS stands paramount to efforts aimed at reducing CO2 emissions, creates employment opportunities along a new value chain that sustains current economic activity, and fits squarely within the growing number of net-zero strategies announced by firms across the energy industry and beyond. However, for CCUS activity to achieve its full potential, it is incumbent that policymakers recognize the nascent opportunity, and take steps to remove obstacles to the development of a CCUS value chain. Concise and targeted action by policymakers can help Texas leverage its position as the world’s “energy capital” to capture a leadership role in the global effort to reduce CO2 emissions.

CCUS Value Chain Development

Figure E1 — Simplified CCUS Value Chain

Graph showing relationship between capture, transport, and use or sequestration

Figure E1 illustrates the three basic components of the CCUS value chain (capture, transport, and use or sequestration) and the premise that no single component functions without the others. This follows because each part of the value chain must develop and operate in coordination with the others. In this sense, value chain development is a coordination problem: if potential barriers to development exist for any part of the value chain, no part is developed. Similarly, incentives applied to any one part of the value chain will have
stimulatory effects for the other parts.

In Texas, coordination is particularly relevant for CCUS due to the existing legal and regulatory framework, which, in addition to commercial risks, can result in coordination failure thus unnecessarily impeding development and increasing costs. Policy can play a critical role in improving the legal and regulatory framework and, in doing so, create a pathway for successful development of the CCUS value chain. For example, clarifying agency jurisdiction for oversight of CO2 sequestration, can in short order, reduce permitting time, lower project uncertainty, and address an important barrier to project finance.

Challenges Facing CCUS Development

Beginning in June 2019, the Baker Institute convened a working group of stakeholders consisting of industry, academia and NGOs to identify and discuss challenges facing CCUS in Texas. A number of topics for consideration were identified by the working group, with broad but varying levels of agreement regarding resolution and timelines.

Near-Term

Class VI primacy and jurisdictional clarity – The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees Underground Injection Control (UIC) program requirements that are in place to protect underground sources of drinking water.1 States can apply for and receive primary enforcement authority (i.e.- primacy) to implement UIC programs provided they are able to meet certain requirements. Texas has primacy for UIC Class I-V wells; it does not yet have primacy for UIC Class VI wells for permanent storage of CO2. Under current Texas law, depending on the type of well and subsurface characteristics, either the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) or the Railroad Commission (RRC) has jurisdictional regulatory authority over wells where CO2 is injected underground (UIC Class II and Class VI). There is broad agreement within the working group that the Texas legislature should grant jurisdiction over permitting of UIC Class VI injection wells to the RRC. Although Senate Bill 1387 (2009) directed the RRC to apply for primacy from the EPA to regulate Class VI wells, any application would likely have suffered in the absence of clear in-state regulatory jurisdiction. Clarifying and consolidating jurisdiction in a single agency will facilitate the application for primacy that, once achieved, could address some uncertainties regarding the permitting process. A bill that does this could move forward in the 2021 legislative session and would be a strong foundation for future action in Texas on CCUS. Importantly, sufficient resources must be in place to staff this activity.

Other Considerations

Regarding the remaining topics for consideration identified by the working group, consensus on a path to resolution did not emerge in the discussions. However, there is widespread agreement that policymakers need to be aware of these matters and, hence, be prepared to consider them going forward.

Long-term liability – Senate Bill 1387 established a fund for long-term stewardship of onshore sequestration sites and named the RRC in charge of the fund. However, no transfer of ownership or liability has been established for onshore sequestration to date. Offshore, Senate Bill 1796 designates the School Land Board as the site owner and grants it the ability to set fees for storage. The bill provides that operators who manage projects on behalf of the state retain liability, but it relieves emitters of CO2 from liability for CO2 stored offshore. No clear consensus emerged from the working group about how to govern liability post-site closure. For example, some working group members view liability as resolved through the site selection and approval process, while others indicate there should be explicit rules on the matter. Nevertheless, despite the range of
views shared, there is broad agreement that liability is an issue that merits consideration. Sufficient data collection and long-term monitoring of CO2 plume activity in the post-injection phase could be a welcome first step toward fully understanding any potential issues and their consequent resolution.

Access to pore space – For onshore sequestration, pore space access and use is currently a negotiated right. Some working group members voiced concern that the negotiated process to secure sufficient legal right to store CO2 beneath private lands in Texas is hampered by a failure to legislatively or judicially resolve the question of pore space ownership as it pertains to CO2. However, it was generally viewed that potentially affected owners of surface and subsurface rights would be receptive to contract negotiations with firms seeking access to pore space for CO2 storage. This necessarily also implicates questions of unitization. Sequestration sites located offshore in state waters may be simpler, since access is administered by the General Land Office (GLO).

Unitization for geologic storage of CO2 – It is not yet known whether a compulsory CO2-specific unitization bill could garner widespread support in Texas. Legislative efforts at mandatory unitization directed at oil and gas extraction have historically been construed as erosive of the rights of surface and subsurface owners, and they have failed as a result. Any future consideration of a unitization bill may be possible only if its scope is limited to geologic storage of CO2 and it addresses matters such as conflicting use, compensation and lien provisions.

Fiscal incentives – There is agreement that fiscal incentives can stimulate investment in a CCUS value chain. But extent, timing and manner of stimulus are viewed differently by various stakeholders, with the cost-benefit analysis of any proposal fitting squarely into the discussions. 45Q is a federally administered tax credit per ton of captured CO2. Although immensely helpful, it does not always provide sufficient commercial certainty to large scale projects. Moreover, the 45Q tax credit will expire January 2026, which, given the timeline for full project development and time to address state/local legal and regulatory uncertainties, means some projects in their initial planning phase may not be able to qualify. Therefore, legislators and state officials in Texas are encouraged to actively support a 45Q extension. There are some interesting opportunities in Texas that could, if leveraged, provide a return to the state. One such opportunity involves CO2 storage offshore, where leasing of pore space would provide a return to the State Education Fund, the size of which would depend on the agreed lease parameters.

Research and development (R&D) – Robust R&D activities are critical to the long-term health of any industry. The US Department of Energy has established a number of programs through direct funding and its national labs, but these are national rather than regional in scope. In Texas, various R&D programs such as the New Technology Innovation Grants (NTIG) program under the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) can serve as examples of funding vehicles that could be streamlined to facilitate targeted R&D funding. Given the importance of hydrocarbons to the Texas economy, a robust R&D portfolio that focuses on efficiency improvements in existing CCUS technologies, new combustion processes, expanded uses of hydrogen produced from hydrocarbon feedstocks, new carbon-based materials, and new uses for CO2 in industrial processes and power generation can contribute greatly to the health of Texas’ economic and environmental future.

Concluding Remarks and a View to the Future

There is precedent for the role of policy in accelerating new energy value chains. Over the past two decades, strong policy frameworks and incentives, such as subsidies and portfolio standards, have played a central role in advancing renewable energy value chains associated with wind and solar. Policy can play a similar key role in advancing CCUS, and resolving legal and regulatory uncertainties will remove barriers to the development of a CCUS value chain. At the front of the list is to establish jurisdictional clarity over permitting and regulation as this will help to advance greater numbers of CCUS projects in the state. Consideration of each of the other areas of concern – liability, pore space, unitization, fiscal terms, and research and development – will also
be important as the CCUS industry advances. Indeed, a clear and sustained commitment from state regulators and elected officials to resolve legal and regulatory uncertainties and provide supportive commercial frameworks will determine whether a robust and long-term CCUS industry in Texas will emerge.

Although the research undertaken here was not intended to include a quantitative evaluation of the costs and benefits of expanding CCUS, there is a strong need for additional work on that front, especially as it pertains to any potential justification for state and local fiscal support. Texas has a significant comparative advantage in deploying and expanding CCUS projects. With sustained action and engagement by policymakers, Texas can fully leverage its comparative advantage and assume its role on the global stage as a leader in the CCUS industry.

Endnote

1. A detailed summary of the UIC program is available at https://www.epa.gov/uic.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Gas+Stove
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

Why Gas Stoves Matter to the Climate — and the Gas Industry: Keeping Them Means Homes Will Use Gas for Heating Too

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy