Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Analyzing market trends
    McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    Mon, Apr. 03, 2023 | 12 pm - 1 pm
    Free Enterprise Lunch & Learn: Why Capitalism Is the Most Ethical Economic System See Details
    Electric car concept
    Roundtable
    Tue, Apr. 04, 2023 | 4 pm - 5:30 pm
    Baker Briefing: Tesla, Taxes and Texas See Details
    Innovators design new technology
    McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth | Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Apr. 05, 2023 | 2 pm - 3 pm
    Accelerating Research into Innovation: What Universities and the US Patent Office Can Do to Pick Up the Pace See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Domestic Health Policy Analysis | Center for Health and Biosciences | Newsletter

Did Recent Efforts to Develop Policy for Genome Editing Have Adequate Public Engagement?

March 10, 2022 | Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Ana S. Iltis
Genome

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kirstin R.W. Matthews
Fellow in Science and Technology Policy
Ana S. Iltis
Nonresident Fellow for Biomedical Research Policy

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

“No,” says Baker Institute fellow Kirstin Matthews in an article co-authored by nonresident scholar Ana Iltis and student intern Sarah Hoover. “Public and stakeholder engagement is an important part of science policy development, especially when reviewing controversial areas that concern deeply moral and religious beliefs and areas where there are significant ambiguities or uncertainties,” say the authors. However, the recommendations of three separate commissions charged with making globally influential recommendations for policies on human embryo genome editing fell short of this goal.

Recent advances in biotechnology have allowed scientists to more effectively and accurately edit the human genome. However, these advances raise questions about how the technology should and can be used. While questions concerning the development and improvement of technology predominately involve the domains of science and engineering, discussions on whether to use a technology at all or how it should be regulated require broader engagement with the public and interested stakeholders. This is particularly important as we explore the types of heritable human genome editing we should permit, if any.

Public and stakeholder engagement is not just about teaching or conducting outreach. It also requires “multi-way communication or a dialogue among scientists, stakeholders and/or the public, such as a presentation of new ideas (a lecture or publication) followed by facilitated discussion,” the authors write. In addition, it “requires listening and synthesizing outside information, perspectives, and thoughts in the process of developing recommendations or policy.”

The authors recommend five ideals for effective public and stakeholder engagement of controversial scientific areas — comprehensive, transparent, inclusive, methodologically sound and accountable — based on a critical review of literature on the subject. Using these five ideals, the authors assessed the three consensus reports related to heritable human genome editing: the 2017 U.S. National Academies report, the 2018 UK Nuffield Council of Bioethics report and the 2020 joint UK Royal Society-U.S. National Academies report. Work on all three reports began after human embryos were edited (2015); the 2020 report was written in response to the birth of the first babies whose genomes had been manipulated (2018). As a result, the reports were not comprehensive enough; they responded to previous research instead of guiding future research. In addition, only the Nuffield Council report inclusively engaged a broad set of individuals by directly requesting their comments to recommendations; the report authors also advertised widely to obtain public feedback. In contrast, the authors of the other reports passively expected interested individuals to contact them.

Since the public funds a majority of biomedical research in the United States, public participation in setting goals and establishing boundaries for research is important. It can ensure that science adequately serves the public interest and helps improve public acceptance and support. To be effective, institutions developing policies for emerging technologies should continuously assess their methods for public engagement and learn new ways, and new technologies, to help engage the public.

In This Issue

The paper “Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does It Mean and What Should It Mean?,” co-authored by Kirstin Matthews, Ana S. Iltis and Sarah Hoover, was published in September 2021 in Frontiers in Political Science. Matthews is a fellow in Science and Technology policy at the Baker Institute and a lecturer in the Department of Biosciences at Rice University. Iltis is a nonresident scholar at the Baker Institute Center for Health and Biosciences and the director of the Center for Bioethics, Health and Society and professor of philosophy at Wake Forest University. Hoover is a student intern at Wake Forest’s Center for Bioethics, Health and Society.

About Health Policy Research

Health Policy Research presents a summary of findings on current health policy issues. It is provided by Vivian Ho, Ph.D., the James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, in collaboration with Laura Petersen, M.D., MPH, chief of the Section of Health Services Research in the Department of Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine.

This publication aims to make research results accessible to regional and national health policymakers. The views expressed herein are those of the study authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Baker Institute or of Baylor College of Medicine.

The Baker Institute and Baylor College of Medicine’s Section of Health Services Research work with scholars from across Rice University and Baylor College of Medicine to address issues of health care — access, financing, organization, delivery and outcomes. Special emphasis is given to issues of health care quality and cost.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Small child reaches into drawer with firearm
Center for Health and Biosciences | Policy Brief

Reducing Firearm Injury and Death for Young Texans Through Safety Courses and Waiting Periods

Read More
Prescription opioid medication pills spilled onto table
Center for Health and Biosciences | Podcast

Baker Briefing: Curbing the Opioid Epidemic in Texas

Read More
Brain
Center for Health and Biosciences | Policy Brief

Texas Needs a State Brain Research Institute

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy