To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.
The immigration policy of the United States has become a dysfunctional socio-technical system where technology deployment has little relation with the way the system behaves. An escalating law enforcement narrative has encouraged the research and development of linear simple technologies to try to solve complex adaptive situations, thus remaining ineffective and actually becoming harmful to US interests. It is a process that neglects the evolving nature of the immigration policy space and the desirable effects of migratory behaviors, and instead insists on the technological fortification of the borderlands to interdict the negative ones. It has also failed to identify counterintuitive points of intervention to improve the performance of the migration socio-technical regime. Under these conditions, most immigration technologies have demonstrated limited capacity to "pivot" and adapt to a changing environment, with the exception of the clandestine technologies developed by deviant actors to penetrate the border interdictions. The study of socio-technical systems provides a good tool to understand the limitations of the current technological architecture of the immigration policy of the US, as well as an approach to reboot the whole system, in order to update it to a more adaptive design.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.