Skip to main content
Home
Home

Main navigation 2

  • Events
    Line for voting in a US election
    Presidential Elections
    Fri, Dec. 01, 2023 | 8:30 am - 4:15 pm
    Previewing the 2024 Presidential Election See Details
    Mexico Flag
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Mexico Forum
    Thu, Dec. 07, 2023 | 8 am - 5 pm
    Mexico Country Outlook 2024 See Details
    Healthy Lifestyle
    Center for Health and Biosciences | U.S. Health System Transformation
    Fri, Dec. 08, 2023 | 8:30 am - 6 pm
    2023 Texas NMDOH Consortium Conference: Advancing Research, Policy and Practice See Details
  • Experts
  • Divisions
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Latin America Initiative | Working Paper

Ctrl+Alt+Del: Rebooting Immigration Policies Through Socio-technical Change

April 8, 2013 | Rodrigo Nieto-Gómez
An envelope from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services rests on the U.S. flag.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Rodrigo Nieto-Gómez
Professor, Center for Homeland Defense and Security, Naval Postgraduate School

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.

Abstract

The immigration policy of the United States has become a dysfunctional socio-technical system where technology deployment has little relation with the way the system behaves. An escalating law enforcement narrative has encouraged the research and development of linear simple technologies to try to solve complex adaptive situations, thus remaining ineffective and actually becoming harmful to US interests. It is a process that neglects the evolving nature of the immigration policy space and the desirable effects of migratory behaviors, and instead insists on the technological fortification of the borderlands to interdict the negative ones. It has also failed to identify counterintuitive points of intervention to improve the performance of the migration socio-technical regime. Under these conditions, most immigration technologies have demonstrated limited capacity to "pivot" and adapt to a changing environment, with the exception of the clandestine technologies developed by deviant actors to penetrate the border interdictions. The study of socio-technical systems provides a good tool to understand the limitations of the current technological architecture of the immigration policy of the US, as well as an approach to reboot the whole system, in order to update it to a more adaptive design.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2013 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005
Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy