Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Why Governments Need Science Advice With Angela McLean See Details
    Green energy Concept
    Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Aug. 20, 2026 | 7 am - 5 pm
    3rd Annual Conference: Energy, Technology, and Grid Resilience See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

The Case of the Gulf Cooperation Council

February 24, 2020 | Paul Stevens
Oil drums

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Paul Stevens

Distinguished Fellow, Chatham House

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Resource curseGCC (Gulf Cooperation Council)

To access the full working paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar. 

Introduction

Purpose of this paper is to answer the questions in the research protocol in the context of the petroleum sector in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC). However, for reasons to be developed, the history of this sector was unique. In particular, the traditional view of resource curse is not entirely appropriate. It is difficult to argue that the windfall revenues generated by the sector damaged the rest of the economy. Before the sector developed, ‘the rest of the economy’ was only subsistence, pearl fishing or some trading. A more productive analytical approach is to ask, given the enormous wealth created by the sector, why did the economies not perform better? The answer is simply that the governments and the international oil companies (IOCs) for the most part failed to optimize the linkages that existed between the sector and the rest of the economy. These linkages involved fiscal, forward and backward linkages although where the blame lies for this failure as will be seen is debatable.

The paper begins by explaining why the GCC makes for a good case study. This is followed by a history of relations between the governments and IOCs with emphasis on their attitudes to the linkages and how they changed over time. This history is then used to address the specific questions in the ‘research protocol’. Finally, based on the history and the answers, the main lessons are drawn that might guide future FDI.

© 2020 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Sunrise with Kuwait Towers timelapse - the best known landmark of Kuwait City. Kuwait, Middle East.
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Report

How Institutional Barriers Shape Kuwait’s Energy Goals

Read More
Canadian landscape of rare earth mining site.
Center for Energy Studies | Energy, Minerals, and Materials | Working Paper

Limiting Adversarial Capital in Critical Minerals Supply Chains

Read More
3d wireframe model of a broken chain with random numbers.
Center for Energy Studies | Issue Brief

Sustainability in a Fragmented Global Economy: Managing Trade-Offs Across Interconnected Systems

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy