Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
    Ellen Ochoa Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Mon, Nov. 02, 2026 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Joni Sue Lane Lecture Series — Exploring Space: A Conversation With Astronaut Ellen Ochoa See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Drug Policy | Commentary

Baker Institute Viewpoints: Jury Nullification

February 19, 2014 | William Martin
Marijuana Law

Table of Contents

Author(s)

William Martin

Nonresident Fellow in Religion and Public Policy | Director, Drug Policy Program

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Jury nullification — when a jury disagrees with the law and acquits a defendant they believe to be guilty — has a long history in the United States of serving as a bellwether for social change on unpopular laws. There are numerous historical examples of juries nullifying laws that would later change due to vast public opposition. More recently, legal professionals have identified jury nullification verdicts in marijuana cases. This should not be surprising given society’s rapidly changing view of marijuana — support for legalization now polls at 58 percent nationally, and in Texas it polls equally well. In this installment of Baker Institute Viewpoints, experts discuss the question, “What does jury nullification of marijuana cases in Texas indicate about the possibility of marijuana legalization?”

Can jurors hasten the legalization of cannabis? by Clay S. Conrad, an attorney and author of “Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine”

Jury nullification: Local option by William Martin, Ph.D., the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Senior Fellow in Religion and Public Policy at the Baker Institute, the Chavanne Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Rice University and the director of the institute’s Drug Policy Program

Ceasefire in the war on marijuana in Texas? Trial by jury and jury nullification by Gilbert G. Garcia, a board certified criminal lawyer and a member of The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws

Prioritizing public safety over applying outdated drug policy by Rehman Bhalesha, a law student and research assistant at South Texas College of Law

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Cannabis cultivation workers trimming hemp plants.
Center for Health Policy | Drug Policy | Policy Brief

How US Hemp Policy Can Balance Consumer Access and Public Health

Read More
Macro close up of droplet dosing a biological and ecological hemp
Texas Briefing | Drug Policy | Podcast

New Texas Hemp Rules and the Future of Cannabis Policy

Read More
Prescription opioid medication pills spilled onto table
Drug Policy | Press Release

Drug policy expert available to speak about fentanyl executive order

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy