Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Stem cell pipette
    Center for Health and Biosciences
    Fri, Sep. 29, 2023 | 7:30 am - 9 am
    Stem Cell Therapies: Hype, Hope and Evidence-based Decisions See Details
    Mandate Protest
    Center for Health and Biosciences
    Mon, Oct. 02, 2023 | 5 pm - 7 pm
    The Deadly Rise of Anti-science: An Evening with Dr. Peter Hotez See Details
    Icons representing clean energy with the evolution of decarbonization at the center
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, Oct. 04, 2023 | 8:30 am - 2:30 pm
    Annual Energy Summit Day 1 — The Evolving Energy Paradigm See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • U.S. Health System Transformation
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      The Baker Institute offers paid internships to degree-seeking students to help train the next generation of policy leaders.
      Read More
      Students team present policy recommendations to a panel of experts at a competition organized by the Baker Institute Student Forum (BISF)
    • Annual Report
    • Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Baker Briefing is a weekly podcast that tackles the most critical foreign and domestic policy issues of the day in conversations with experts at the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      Logo for the Baker Briefing Podcast (Square)
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Commentary

Will the North American Auto Industry Survive Proposed U.S. Electric Vehicle Subsidies?

November 22, 2021 | David A. Gantz
An electric car charges.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Head shot of international trade fellow David Gantz
David A. Gantz
Will Clayton Fellow in Trade and International Economics
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Several months ago, I asked (and tried to answer) the question, “Will the Mexican auto industry survive the USMCA and AMLO?” This submission posits a related question. Can the North American auto industry survive the proposed U.S. subsidy policies for electric vehicles (EVs) and EV batteries? In the future will this poster child for efficient North American integration, where the U.S imports annually $29.5 billion worth of car parts from Mexico and exports $5.9 billion to Canada, and exports $11.7 billion worth of completed vehicles to Canada and $67.5 billion to Mexico, continue or be radically diminished, if EV and EV battery producers are strongly discouraged from establishing facilities in Canada and Mexico?

The “Build Back Better Act” (BBBA) is a mammoth legislative package worth over $1.8 trillion in its current incomplete form that addresses a wide range of issues ranging from childcare to climate change. (Separate legislation addressing inter alia the rebuilding of America’s roads, bridges, ports and dams, expanding the national network of EV charging stations, improving the reliability of the U.S. electrical grids, and extending the availability of high-speed internet was signed by President Biden into law on Nov. 15, 2021.) My focus here is on the BBBA provisions designed to encourage Americans to purchase more EVs over the next decade.

Caveat: The legislation has been passed by the House but awaits action in the Senate. All provisions are subject to change, including those relating to EV and battery subsidies, and at this writing it remains possible that the entire package will fail because of differences among members of the Democratic Party and growing fears of runaway inflation. Moreover, as discussed below, the “Buy American” and pro-union provisions not surprisingly face broad opposition from multiple sources.

Few would question the desirability of encouraging the substitution of EVs for gasoline powered vehicles by American consumers, even though some wonder whether within the next 8-10 years sufficient clean energy will be available from America’s aging electrical grid, particularly in states such as California and Texas, to assure that the shift to EVs actually results in less carbon dioxide pollution. (In 2020 coal still produced about 20% of US electrical power demand; natural gas, 40%; nuclear, 20%; and renewables, 20%). However, legitimate questions arise as to whether the “Buy American” focused subsidy provisions are consistent with the USMCA, WTO rules and the best interests of American (and North American) auto producers, workers and consumers. Also, the full subsidies that would be provided only for EVs produced in the U.S. with union labor, by reducing consumer choices, seem inconsistent with another Biden administration objective (whether or not realistic) of EV sales of 50% of the U.S. market by 2030.

Under the subsidy scheme as currently specified in the draft legislation, for the first five years EV buyers would receive a $7,500 tax credit regardless of where the vehicle is made. For the ensuing five years, the base credit would apply only to EVs produced in factories located in the U.S. In other words, if the assembly plant is in Canada, Mexico or a third country the credit doesn’t apply and the effective cost to the consumer/purchaser rises by $7,500. An additional $500 tax credit would be applicable only to the sale of any car with a U.S.-made battery, and a further $4,500 (for the entire ten-year period)  only if the car is made in a unionized plant in the United States.

Many of the details are not available and probably won’t be until if and when the legislation is enacted and implementing regulations are issued by U.S. authorities. Canadian government pressure on both the administration and key members of Congress may be effective to some extent, but availability of any major portion of the subsidies for Canadian-built cars exported to the U.S. is in my view problematic. Or not. Canada does have greater leverage than Mexico, given that Canada is a producer of lithium, graphite and cobalt, among the most important minerals for EV battery production (and one of the few stable, friendly nations that produces them). It seems unlikely to me that the Canadians will say to Biden officials, “Fine. We will happily ship these minerals to Tennessee and Kentucky so that your (and only your) battery plants and their workers can turn them into EV batteries.”

The subsidies would not be available for the purchase of vehicles produced in Mexican auto plants that are unionized at wages that are 20% or less of American or Canadian wages. Mexico, other than low-cost labor, has fewer benefits to offer than Canada, in part because energy costs for industry in Mexico are surging and reliability is decreasing, the USMCA rules require that 40% of auto content and 45% of small truck content be produced in facilities where wages are at least $16/hour, and because Mexican President Lopez Obrador’s (AMLO’s) anti-business policies tend to discourage major new investments. However, one of the major benefits of maintaining a robust auto and auto parts sector in Mexico is the jobs it provides for Mexican workers, workers who will be less tempted to cross into the United States if they have gainful employment in Mexico.

The proposed subsidies, as Canada’s trade minister Mary Ng has noted, violate the WTO’s Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement (SCMA) since they are specific to a given industry (EVs and EV batteries). It is uncertain how much this matters in the real world. However, the likelihood of a case being brought at the WTO is slim given that without the domestic subsidies and the Mexican production or co-production option, EV production in the U.S. is likely to be significantly more costly than for competing producers in China, South Korea and Germany among others. Moreover, the WTO dispute settlement system’s Appellate Body has been neutered since December 2019, meaning that any member such as the United States can indefinitely block the adoption of a panel decision against it.

The remedies for Canada and Mexico under the USMCA are much more viable. There is no absolute bar to subsidies under the USMCA,  but the SCMA limits are incorporated by reference. Moreover, a broad prohibition exists in USMCA Article 2.3.1 against the bedrock principle of denial of national treatment.

Under Chapter 31 of the USMCA (state-to-state dispute settlement), unlike the corresponding Chapter 20 of NAFTA, it is very difficult for the responding party (e.g., the U.S.) to block the arbitration proceedings once initiated, by refusing to appoint panelists. Art. 31.1 provides that if “a dispute regarding a matter arises under this Agreement and under another international trade agreement to which the disputing Parties are party, including the WTO Agreement, the complaining Party may select the forum in which to settle the dispute.” In other words, Canada and Mexico could bring a Chapter 31 claim against the United States based on violations of both the USMCA and the SCMA, with trade sanctions as the ultimate remedy if the matter were not resolved through mandatory consultations and ultimately the U.S. were to refuse to comply with the arbitral panel’s adverse decision. Since Canada and Mexico are among the world’s few major auto producing countries that are not likely to be subsidizing EV production, and are major importers of vehicles from and exporters to the U.S., they would have a powerful incentive for filing a USMCA case against the U.S. should all other efforts at reaching a compromise fail.

What ultimately may be more important to the administration than strenuous opposition from Canada and Mexico is opposition from West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin — whose vote for the BBBA is crucial with a 50-50 divided Senate — as Toyota has a major non-unionized auto plant in West Virginia. Toyota and Tesla, along with owners of many other non-unionized auto plants in the U.S. and the Washington ambassadors of nations that export autos to the U.S. have communicated their opposition to administration officials and members of Congress as well. Mr. Manchin has been quoted as noting that the extra credits (for unionized auto production) are “wrong” and “not who we are.” Governors of other non-union auto producing states have also objected. Some critics have charged that Mr. Biden is sacrificing the environment to help his political allies such as the United Auto Workers.

Politically, one downside of the U.S. EV subsidies is that they make it more difficult for the U.S. to take the high road when criticizing China’s own massive (and illegal) subsidies for EV and battery production in China (and for many other items such as AI, robotics and chips), and may effectively give carte blanche to other major producing countries (particularly Germany, Japan and South Korea) to institute their own subsidy programs. This probably doesn’t concern anyone except for the relatively few U.S. trade lawyers and policy makers who believe the U.S. should adhere to international trade rules. One might more logically consider whether from a political/strategic point of view it makes sense for the U.S. to significantly weaken the auto industries (and thus the manufacturing economies) of its nearest neighbors and most significant trading partners, undermining the highly competitive co-production model for autos and auto parts established under NAFTA nearly 30 years ago.

Given the current state of the U.S. legislative proposals, no obvious solution to the problem is evident, although continuing disagreements within the Democratic Party may ultimately cause the legislative package to fail or result in major modifications to the EV subsidies program due to Congressional, business and Canadian/Mexican opposition. Regrettably, the Biden administration, despite the high level “Three Amigos” summit Nov. 18, where AMLO and Trudeau complained strenuously about the discriminatory nature of subsidies, has evidenced little sympathy with the positions of Canada and Mexico. Press secretary Psaki was dismissive: “It’s not the first time that there have been incentives and tax credits for consumers — lower prices for consumers [and] help incentivize a move towards a clean energy industry.” As the Washington Post argued in an editorial Nov. 20, “A level playing field would be more neighborly — and better policy.”

One can only hope that as the legislation moves forward in the Senate a few wiser heads will consider the presumably unintended consequences of the subsidies for Canada, Mexico and the United States, and for the future viability of the USMCA and North American economic cooperation.

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2023 by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Marijuana+Law
Drug Policy | Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Commentary

Marijuana Rescheduling Is Creating a Buzz for Some, Consternation for DEA

Read More
Xochitl Galvez
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Issue Brief

Xóchitl Gálvez Courts Voters in Texas

Read More
Farm Worker
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Research Paper

How Granting Amnesty to Undocumented Immigrants Could Boost the US Labor Market

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy