Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Global Energy Map
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, July 29, 2026 | 11 am - 12 pm
    2026 Statistical Review of World Energy See Details
    Angela McLean Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Wed, Aug. 12, 2026 | 11:30 am - 1 pm
    Civic Scientist Lecture Series: Why Governments Need Science Advice With Angela McLean See Details
    Green energy Concept
    Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Aug. 20, 2026 | 7 am - 5 pm
    3rd Annual Conference: Energy, Technology, and Grid Resilience See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health Policy | Journal

Unproven Stem Cell-based Interventions and Harm to Existing and Future Patients

April 4, 2022 | Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Flora Naylor
Stem Cell lab

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Senior Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Flora Naylor

Former Research Assistant, Science and Technology Policy Program

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Abstract

Over the past decade, the landscape of unproven stem cell-based interventions (SCBIs) has dramatically changed. Once perceived as only operating in countries with less developed health infrastructures, clinics advertising unproven SCBIs are now located in almost every developed country and their numbers are increasing despite regulatory authorities working to close the more unscrupulous and dangerous ones. In 2021, Leigh Turner from the University of California, Irvine, identified 2,752 clinics in the USA operated by 1,480 businesses, a 400% increase from the numbers of clinics reported in 2016. This SCBI marketplace remains largely unregulated despite evidence indicating that many interventions are ineffective and can increase risk for patients. Moreover, providing unproven interventions threatens legitimate stem cell clinical research, delaying—if not potentially preventing—the development of therapies for a variety of conditions. To address these risks to current and future patients, companies developing SCBIs should work with policymakers and patient advocates to protect clinical research and the reputation of the field.

Access the full journal article in Cell & Gene Therapy Insights (registration required).

 

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Infant or newborn baby feet with pulse oximeter for determine oxygen saturation in baby's blood, in incubator at intensive room care in the hospital after delivery.
Center for Health Policy | Science and Technology Policy | Report

Building a Framework for Artificial Womb Technology Clinical Trials

Read More
Medical workers working in conference room.
Center for Health Policy | Health Economics | Issue Brief

The Growing Gap Between Hospital CEO and Direct Care Pay

Read More
Artificial intelligence concept.
Center for Health Policy | Podcast

How Artificial Intelligence Affects Childhood Development

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy