Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

The Future of Plastics Sustainability: Advanced Recycling

February 15, 2021 | Rachel A. Meidl
plastic+waste+and+recycling
AdobeStock

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Rachel Meidl
Rachel A. Meidl
Fellow in Energy and Environment
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Meidl, Rachel. 2021. The Future of Plastics Sustainability: Advanced Recycling. Policy brief: Recommendations for the New Administration. 02.15.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

This brief is part of a series of policy recommendations for the administration of President Joe Biden. Focusing on a range of important issues facing the country, the briefs are intended to provide decision-makers with relevant and effective ideas for addressing domestic and foreign policy priorities. View the entire series at www.bakerinstitute.org/recommendations-2021.

 

The Plastic Waste Crisis Continues to Evolve

Plastic waste not only affects environmental quality and ecosystem health, but it also has consequences for our communities in both developed and developing economies.1,2,3,4,5 Recent data challenges the once-held assumption that the United States is adequately managing its plastic waste through proper collection, recycling, and permitted landfilling.6 In fact, the United States could be as high as third among countries contributing to coastal plastic pollution, according to new figures that account for U.S. plastic exports and illegal dumping and littering domestically.7 More than half of all plastics collected for recycling in the United States were exported, and, of this, 88% of exports were routed to countries with insufficient solid waste infrastructure, unable to effectively manage, recycle, or dispose of plastics.8 Accounting for these updated contributions, the amount of plastic waste generated in the United States and estimated to enter the coastal environment is five times larger than previously estimated, rendering the U.S. contribution among the highest in the world.9

This underscores a glaring need within our own U.S. borders to improve the quality of plastics and the economics around collection, sorting, and waste management and to advance recycling technologies, infrastructure, and consumer education. Without a transformational shift in our approach, the mismanagement of plastics waste will continue, resulting in the loss of valuable materials and squandered opportunities to recover and harvest the value of these resources. If sustainability is a global and national priority, it is imperative to understand that the vision of a circular economy can only be realized by deeming used plastic a resource and not a waste, and through employing advanced recycling technologies that “keep the molecule in play” and maintain materials at an economic value.

Advanced Recycling: An Untapped Opportunity to Progress Toward a Circular Economy

Plastic recycling in the United States has remained steady at 9% since 2012;10 globally, current recycling rates are thought to be between 14% and 18%.11 Low recycling rates can be attributed to technical challenges such as the contamination of recyclable polymers; the customization for particular applications that inhibit collection, separation, and reuse; and the quality and complexity of plastics that are made of multiple polymers and additives. With global demand for plastics projected to triple by 2050,12 the overall contribution of plastic waste to the supply chain must change dramatically. The recycling and petrochemical industries can play an important role in the transition to a circular economy by converting polymeric waste into virgin-grade feedstock, which can then be used to produce new materials and chemicals of virgin-grade quality. However, the current conventional recycling technology the nation is reliant on is strained by the steadily increasing volume of plastics, which cannot be managed using only traditional mechanical recycling.

To efficiently recycle large amounts of plastic waste, a circular economy requires innovative technologies such as advanced recycling, commonly known as chemical recycling. Chemical recycling, such as pyrolysis or depolymerization, occurs at the molecular level, where plastic polymers are broken down into their constituent monomers that can then be used as feedstock or raw materials for manufacturing new products of equal or greater quality. Studies illustrate that as much as half of all global plastics packaging could be recycled by 2040 if chemical recycling technologies were widely adopted.13 However, in order to achieve a recycling rate of 25% of plastics packaging, $50 billion in investment would be required by 2040 to deliver enough chemical recycling capacities.14 Advanced recycling technologies have been used to turn plastics into fuels for decades, but the growing market demand for high-quality plastic recyclate—due to significantly higher recycled content targets in packaging products, a heightened sense of corporate and social responsibility, and China’s waste import ban—have revealed a need to improve domestic and global capabilities of waste management and recycling systems.

While mechanical recycling is the primary mechanism to manage PET, HDPE, and PE plastic (some of the most common types of plastic in use today), the reality is that a high percentage of mixed chemistry, low-quality, and low-density plastic material may never be eligible for recycling or reuse without an integrated waste management approach. Even with investments in advanced robotics, enhanced optic recognition technologies, and artificial intelligence to improve mechanical recycling processes, there are fundamental limitations that inhibit traditional methodologies from recovering all polymer families on the market and entering the end-of-life waste stream. Understanding the risks across the entire life cycle is critically important for establishing regulatory certainty, sustainability, and commercial viability for various recycling strategies.

Recommendations to Enable Advanced Recycling Technologies

Improve the economics around collection.

Even if advanced recycling technologies were commercially deployed, many of the same challenges inherent in the current recycling system remain, such as collection, sorting, and processing. Insufficient investment in collection infrastructure and low municipal solid waste management budgets fail to cover operating costs. Increasing the value of after-use plastic packaging in the form of packaging fees or recycled-content legislation could help to incentivize the collection of waste plastics and reduce the likelihood of leakage from the collection system.

Ensure modernized regulatory and permitting frameworks.

Outdated regulations and permitting frameworks that fail to keep pace with technologies create a barrier for innovation and can impede the uptake of advanced recycling efforts. Advanced recycling technologies that are classified as waste disposal instead of manufacturing processes impede the expansion of chemical recycling and decrease economic opportunities to repurpose plastics for feedstocks that can produce higher-value products. Policies should appropriately classify and delineate commodities versus waste by ensuring that post-consumer plastic feedstock intended for advanced recycling is not classified as “solid waste” and the facilities that produce them are permitted accordingly.

Support an integrated waste management framework.

An integrated waste management framework aims to accelerate transformational change to meet ambitious recycling targets and is foundational to sustainable materials management. The Biden administration should encourage circularity measures that go beyond the traditional mindset of reduce, reuse, and recycle to include a progressive approach that promotes recovery, redesign, and remanufacture. Chemical recycling increases our capacity to process and recover unrecyclable plastics waste, ensures that more polymers are reprocessed into higher-value products, recaptures the value of plastics by “keeping the molecule in play,” and reduces the need for primary extraction and production.

Commission a sustainability study on the social, environmental, and economic impacts of chemical recycling technologies to understand the costs, benefits, and trade-offs and to identify where federal investment in research and development (R&D) is needed.

There is a dearth of information on the overall environmental performance of advanced recycling technologies from cradle to grave and across the value chain, particularly regarding energy consumption and safety of the process output. A lack of insight around sustainability metrics encumbers public acceptance, delays commercial uptake, and ultimately prevents innovations from advancing U.S. leadership in science and technology to help solve the growing plastic waste crisis. The study should also develop a waste management priority and timetable for different polymers that focuses on cost and recyclability of plastics and the need for R&D to advance the options for those currently hard-to-recycle plastics.

Integrate life-cycle dimensions into waste management strategies for an understanding of sustainability metrics.

Although current methodologies and tools for assessing and comparing the environmental and social impacts of a product or process are not well adapted to chemical recycling, integrating a life-cycle dimension into all waste management strategies in the waste hierarchy can objectively inform decisions and accelerate the transition of innovations to higher technology readiness levels.

Commission a national study of projected plastic waste quantities and types.

The Biden administration should commission a national study that quantifies and analyzes projected polymer waste streams and their compositions at the national level to strategize and support the establishment of suitable regulatory and investment conditions for conventional and advanced recycling technologies. The study should provide recommendations for improving national data collection, quality, and reporting and for ensuring the compatibility of definitions, terms, and language around recycling and waste management systems.

Conclusion

Increasing plastics sustainability can generate new opportunities for modernization, competitiveness, and job creation, consistent with global and national economic, energy, and environmental objectives. The United States cannot progress to circularity without an advanced recycling agenda that recognizes the value in plastic waste. Chemical recycling is only one key component in an overall integrated waste management system that will complement existing mechanical methods that are successfully and profitably managing a subset of polymers. Advanced recycling has the potential to help the nation achieve global sustainability goals and a climate-neutral, circular economy. However, if circularity is the preferred way forward, it is imperative to consider and assess innovative recycling technologies that could have enormous economic value in transforming plastic waste into building blocks that can be reintegrated to material supply chains as feedstock for new, higher-value products.

Technology alone will not solve the plastic waste issue. Transforming the system and evolving to a circular economy will only be successful if the economics around collection and sorting are improved. Additionally, it is essential to invest in emerging technologies, shift consumer behavior, design for circularity, and utilize fiscal instruments, government standards, and voluntary measures across the entire value chain. Regardless of the configuration, a circular economy will require the underpinning of informed and balanced policies that keep pace with technologies across their whole life cycle and account for impacts along the global supply chain.

Endnotes

1. Kara Lavender Law, “Plastics in the marine environment,” Annual Review of Marine Science 9 (2017): 205–229, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevmarine-010816-060409.

2. Martin Wagner and Scott Lambert (eds.), Freshwater Microplastics (Springer International Publishing, 2018), https://www. springer.com/gp/book/9783319616148.

3. Yooeun Chae and Youn-Joo An, “Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: A review,” Environmental Pollution 240 (2018): 387–395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2018.05.008.

4. Steve A. Carr, Jin Liu, and Arnold G. Tesoro, “Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants,” Water Research 91 (2016): 174–182, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002.

5. World Health Organization, Microplastics in Drinking-Water, 2019, https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_ health/publications/microplastics-indrinking-water/en/.

6. Kara Lavender Law et al., “The United States’ contribution of plastic waste to land and ocean,” Science Advances 6 (2020), https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/ advances/6/44/eabd0288.full.pdf.

7. Ibid.

8. Ibid.

9. Ibid.

10. Environmental Protection Agency, “Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste and Recycling,” https://www.epa.gov/factsand-figures-about-materials-waste-andrecycling/plastics-material-specific-data.

11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Improving Plastics Management: Trends, policy responses, and the role of international co-operation and trade, OECD Environmental Policy Paper no. 12, 2018, 20, https://www.oecd.org/environment/ waste/policy-highlights-improvingplastics-management.pdf.

12. World Economic Forum, The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics, January 2016, http://www3. weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_New_Plastics_ Economy.pdf.

13. Guy Bailey and Ashish Chitalia, “Can chemical recycling make plastic more sustainable?” Wood Mackenzie, November 16, 2020, https://www.woodmac.com/news/ opinion/can-chemical-recycling-makeplastic-more-sustainable/.

14. Ibid.

 

 


This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/DBW9-DN79
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Gas+Stove
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

Why Gas Stoves Matter to the Climate — and the Gas Industry: Keeping Them Means Homes Will Use Gas for Heating Too

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy