Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    AIHC New
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
    Ellen Ochoa Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Mon, Nov. 02, 2026 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Joni Sue Lane Lecture Series — Exploring Space: A Conversation With Astronaut Ellen Ochoa See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Drug Policy | Journal

Explaining Dimensions of State-Level Punitiveness in the United States: The Roles of Social, Economic, and Cultural Factors

August 13, 2014 | Katharine Harris, Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf, John C. Morris
A prisoner grabs onto the bars of a jail cell.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Katharine Harris

Alfred C. Glassell, III, Fellow in Drug Policy

Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf

Old Dominion University

John C. Morris

Old Dominion University

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Abstract

The United States currently imprisons more citizens than any other Western nation. Over the last few decades, the trend across the United States has been to increase penalties for many offenses. This increase in state punitiveness has likely contributed to the existing state of mass incarceration. If there are certain factors that enhance a state’s penchant for punitiveness, identifying these factors can offer a better understanding of mass incarceration and why certain policy choices are made. Drawing from theories of social control and racial threat, we test social and economic explanations for variations in state punitiveness across several dimensions. We find the effect of the independent variables is not uniform across the dimensions, suggesting there is a difference in how criminal justice policy decisions are made depending on the policy area in question. This finding begs for further investigation into the issue of state punitiveness.

Read the full article in Criminal Justice Policy Review.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414547042
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Cannabis cultivation workers trimming hemp plants.
Center for Health Policy | Drug Policy | Policy Brief

How US Hemp Policy Can Balance Consumer Access and Public Health

Read More
Macro close up of droplet dosing a biological and ecological hemp
Texas Briefing | Drug Policy | Podcast

New Texas Hemp Rules and the Future of Cannabis Policy

Read More
Prescription opioid medication pills spilled onto table
Drug Policy | Press Release

Drug policy expert available to speak about fentanyl executive order

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy