Climate Action versus Inaction: Balancing the Costs for Gulf Energy Exporters
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Share this Publication
- Print This Publication
- Cite This Publication Jim Krane (2020) Climate action versus inaction: balancing the costs for Gulf energy exporters, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47:1, 117-135, (https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2020.1714269)Copy Citation
Abstract
Climate change poses a strategic dilemma for oil-exporting states of the Gulf. By sapping global demand for crude oil, climate action threatens the economic rents that underpin their governance and regime legitimacy. However, the Gulf states are also among the countries most exposed to physical risks of a warming climate and thus would benefit most from reducing ongoing accumulations of carbon in the atmosphere and associated adaptation costs. In other words, the political and economic risks of climate action run counter to the physical and environmental risks. These bifurcated interests differentiate the Gulf producers from oil exporters in more temperate regions, which would experience milder short-run damage—or even benefits—from a warming climate. A successful economic diversification strategy could address both physical and economic risks but would require structural changes in rentier governance.
Read the full article in the British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies.