Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Portrait of Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken
    Tue, Oct. 03, 2023 | 6 pm - 7 pm
    A Conversation With Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken See Details
    Icons representing clean energy with the evolution of decarbonization at the center
    Center for Energy Studies
    Wed, Oct. 04, 2023 | 8:30 am - 2:30 pm
    Annual Energy Summit Day 1 — The Evolving Energy Paradigm See Details
    Icons representing clean energy with the evolution of decarbonization at the center
    Center for Energy Studies
    Thu, Oct. 05, 2023 | 8:30 am - 2:45 pm
    Annual Energy Summit Day 2 — The Evolving Energy Paradigm See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • U.S. Health System Transformation
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      The Baker Institute offers paid internships to degree-seeking students to help train the next generation of policy leaders.
      Read More
      Students team present policy recommendations to a panel of experts at a competition organized by the Baker Institute Student Forum (BISF)
    • Annual Report
    • Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Baker Briefing is a weekly podcast that tackles the most critical foreign and domestic policy issues of the day in conversations with experts at the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      Logo for the Baker Briefing Podcast (Square)
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

China’s Countrywide Ban on Plastics: Good Intentions Do Not Equate to Good Policies

January 27, 2020 | Rachel A. Meidl
Plastic bottles of various colors.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Rachel Meidl
Rachel A. Meidl
Fellow in Energy and Environment
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteChinaPlastics

The Chinese government recently announced plans to address the growing waste issue by phasing out the use of single-use plastics by 2025 with major cities and certain industries affected by the end of 2020. China produces the largest quantity of plastic waste in the world and accounts for the highest shares of mismanaged plastic waste. This means that plastic waste in China is not formally collected, controlled, and contained in regulated systems and infrastructure and thus has a high risk of leakage and transport to the natural environment and oceans via waterways, winds and tides. Banning will not prevent plastic waste or plastic alternatives from migrating to the ecosystem if there is no mechanism for it to be collected in the first place. Targeting countries with high rates of waste generation and waste mismanagement can be a viable path forward, but only if integrated with scaled technology and infrastructure to collect, sort, process, recycle and recover; a regulatory system that can manage the process; and informed and responsible citizens. In China’s case, banning is a premature effort and puts the cart before the horse.

A fundamental problem of the escalating plastic waste dilemma is that society is approaching it as a product-based solution, rather than a system-based solution. Simply banning a product and encouraging the use of understudied alternative products that have unintended and unquantified environmental, social and economic impacts throughout its life cycle is not enough. After all, we want to ensure we are supplementing or replacing plastics with materials that are safe for the environment, people and the economy and do not exacerbate the global waste problem. A longer-term, sustainable solution is investing in R&D to engineer higher quality polymers with end-of-life management in mind; technology and solid waste systems that manage a wide array of plastic polymers on the market mechanically as well as chemically, including biodegradable or compostable biopolymers; consumer education to increase awareness; and cooperative mechanisms throughout the supply chain. All of this requires the underpinning of an informed and balanced regulatory framework that keeps pace with technologies across the life cycle, accounts for impacts along the supply chain, and encourages innovation. Banning plastics prior to understanding and embarking upon these critical elements sets the system up for failure and takes us further away from achieving sustainability and global circularity goals.

Bans and partial bans serve a purpose and can be warranted, especially when a chemical or product poses unnecessary risk to public health or the environment such as lead paint, polychloride biphenyls and asbestos. Bans also demonstrate public engagement and political awareness of social and environmental issues that stimulate robust dialogue. They reinforce our civic rights and values in the democratic system. These are all great things. However, bans also need to be informed by data and science that is methodical, collaborative and practical so it does not disincentivize and stifle innovation to create better alternatives, technologies and infrastructure — or convey the illusion that this singular action solves or substantially reduces the plastic pollution problem. Prohibitions are not the only avenue to tackle the plastic waste issue. There are many pathways to consider outside of command-and-control methodologies. Market-based arrangements in the form of taxes, charges, subsidies, deposit-refund systems, recycling rate targets and behavior change programs are all vehicles that can, with an understanding of local and regional characteristics, effectively move the needle on improving the ever-increasing plastic waste problem.

We live and operate in a global economy, so China’s ban may have reverberating consequences if it fails to create a system that is multidimensional and transparent, and does not consider the global enterprise. For a ban to be effective, infrastructure and a comprehensive recycling program is needed, one that incorporates mechanical and chemical recycling technologies. While mechanical recycling is viewed as the primary mechanism to reduce the environmental and waste management issues, a high percentage of mixed chemistry, low-quality, low-density plastic material may never be eligible for traditional recycling or reuse without advanced techniques coupled with a fundamental redesign of the materials. Reengineering plastics so that they can be broken down into its molecular components at the end of its life and then remanufactured into new plastics of equal quality will bring value to our economy and reduce the dependence on virgin sources while shepherding us to a more sustainable path. Globally, we should be evaluating ways to recapture the economic value of plastics — it’s an untapped resource.

However, growing the market and creating business opportunities require a significant paradigm shift in how we view plastics. This will entail novel approaches to chemical recycling, such as pyrolysis to manage the millions of tons of low-value complex polymers, and associated regulatory reform for it to take shape. It will also involve completely new infrastructure, supply chains, and partnerships with better solutions that drive process efficiencies across the entire system while improving cost structure. Innovative technologies exist, many of them emerging and scaling, but if these are adopted and scaled along with modernized regulations that keep pace with technological advancements, there is tremendous opportunity and economic value to be realized. In order to reach this goal, investments are needed to support these transformational technologies; educational awareness campaigns; and collaboration between industries, technology providers, and governments at all levels. If society continues to deem plastics as a “waste” with little to no value, we squander our incentive to discover ways to recapture its stored energy and reintroduce it to the economy as a fuel, feedstock or higher value product. This moves us further away in our bold quest to a circular economy.

The plastic waste strategy needs a balance of public policy interventions, voluntary reduction schemes, corporate commitments, financial incentives, changes in human behavior, and an understanding that a solution that is socially, economically, technologically, environmentally, or politically palatable in one region of the world may not be transposable in all economies. Collection, separation, and recycling of new reformulated plastics is more feasible in developed economies because there are formal, established collection processes, regulations, and taxes that reinforce recycling. In China’s situation, as is the case in most developing nations, waste collection is a fundamental first step before any other complex system is created.

Plastics are not the problem. It’s what people choose do with them that creates the disorder in our ecosystem and economy. As a global society that yearns for a circular economy, it is imperative to understand that marine debris comes almost entirely from the developing world, not countries with established waste collection systems. Instead of leveraging specious bans that distract and delay governments from confronting the actual problem, we should encourage approaches that focus on the areas of highest risk and are tailored to the needs and deficiencies of the region. Without a system to collect, the infrastructure and technology to manage all plastic polymers currently on the market, and absent responsible and informed citizens to diligently dispose of their wastes, it does not matter how many bans are in place — plastics will not be able to be managed in a controlled environment and are at high risk of entering our world’s oceans.

This post originally appeared in the Forbes blog on January 27, 2020.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Semiconductor
Center for Energy Studies | Report

Silicon Hegemon: Could China Take Over Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry Without Invading?

Read More
Frozen power
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

What Happened in Texas? Understanding the February 2021 Blackouts

Read More
latin america
Center for Energy Studies | Journal

Energy Transformation, Social Inclusion and Economic Prosperity in Latin America: An Introduction

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy