Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Rice Owls baseball
    Roundtable
    Sat, Mar. 25, 2023 | 2 pm - 5:30 pm
    Rice Baseball Game: Rice vs. the University of Texas at San Antonio See Details
    Woman at refugee camp in Syria
    Women’s Rights, Human Rights and Refugees | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Tue, Mar. 28, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Exploring the Intersection of Gender and Displacement in the Middle East and North Africa See Details
    Analyzing market trends
    McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    Mon, Apr. 03, 2023 | 12 pm - 1 pm
    Free Enterprise Lunch & Learn: Why Capitalism Is the Most Ethical Economic System See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Conflict Resolution and U.S. Foreign Policy | Commentary

Biden’s National Security (Sort of) Strategy

October 26, 2022 | Joe Barnes
US Flag Military

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Headshot of Joe Barnes
Joe Barnes
Bonner Means Baker Fellow
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Foreign policyNational securityBiden

The Biden administration recently issued its National Security Strategy (NSS). The strategy, mandated by Congress, follows a short interim national strategy issued by the administration in March. The reason for the delay is obvious: the Russian invasion of Ukraine.  The text of the NSS is available for download from the White House.

There is nothing particularly new in the strategy. The general thrust and individual policies of the Biden administration, now 18 months in office, are well known. But the strategy is nonetheless valuable. It summarizes, in 48 pages, the administration’s approach to foreign policy. The NSS will certainly be read closely by Congress, executive agencies and foreign governments.

Like all such documents, the NSS is a bureaucratic product. Every major institutional player gets to tout its successes and justify its current policies. At an important level, the strategy is like a multiple-choice exam where every answer is “all of the above.” Still, it is possible to glean some highlights from the routinely boilerplate language.

Substantial portions of the strategy cover familiar ground for anyone who has followed President Joe Biden’s approach to U.S. foreign policy. The NSS stresses the urgency of domestic economic renewal in today’s highly competitive global environment. This provides an opportunity for the NSS to highlight some of Biden’s major domestic legislation: the infrastructure bill, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act. The NSS also stresses the importance of alliances. This is a theme that Biden has emphasized since his presidential campaign. Then and now, his attitude differs from his predecessor, President Donald Trump, who often showed disdain toward individual allies and even alliances in general.

Early in the NSS, the administration lays out two fundamental forces driving international affairs: the return of great power politics and the rising importance of global issues like climate change and infectious diseases. These two forces are in tension. The former makes cooperation more fraught; the latter makes cooperation more imperative. These tensions cannot be resolved, though they can be managed. Much of the strategy is given over to how the Biden administration hopes to accomplish this task.

Unsurprisingly, Russia and China dominate much of the NSS. The strategy describes Russia, particularly in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine, as the more direct threat to international order; the challenge from China, in contrast, is cast as more systemic:

“Russia poses an immediate threat to the free and open international system, recklessly flouting the basic laws of the international order today, as its brutal war of aggression against Ukraine has shown. The PRC, by contrast, is the only competitor with both the intent to reshape the international order and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military and technological power to advance that objective.”

The strategy embeds these challenges as part of a broader global struggle between democracy and authoritarianism. This reflects both a long-running Wilson streak of idealism in conventional U.S. foreign policy and sense that, in recent years, democracy has been struggling, not just abroad but here in the United States. But the NSS stops well short of a Manichean battle to the death between the forces of freedom and autocracy. The strategy distinguishes between autocracies that seek to undermine international order and those, however unsavory their domestic policies, that do not. According to the NSS, the United States stands ready to partner with the latter. Moreover, the strategy forgoes democratization by force: “We do not believe that governments and societies everywhere must be remade in America’s image for us to be secure,” it says.

If much of the NSS is understandably given over to discussion of China and Russia, it does include sections on the Middle East, Latin America and Africa. The section on the Middle East does not state outright that the Biden administration will deprioritize the region. But the text suggests more modest U.S. objectives:

“We have too often defaulted to military-centric policies underpinned by an unrealistic faith in force and regime change to deliver sustainable outcomes, while failing to adequately account for opportunity costs to competing global priorities or unintended consequences. It is time to eschew grand designs in favor of more practical steps that can advance U.S. interests and help regional partners lay the foundation for greater stability, prosperity, and opportunity for the people of the Middle East and for the American people.”

With the exception of the Middle East, however, there is little sense of setting priorities in the NSS or much discussion of trade-offs. And yet strategy, to a large extent, consists of ruthless prioritization and painful trade-offs. This is true even of the United States, which, for all its power, possesses limited resources. In many ways the strategy depicts the United States as unbounded by these constraints: we will lead in Europe, we will lead in East Asia, we will lead, in fact, everywhere. This is not a criticism of this particular NSS; it is simply the nature of the beast. The best way to assess the strategy of the Biden or indeed any administration is to examine actual polices, actual budgetary outlays, actual deployment of military and other resources. At root, the NSS is talk — informative, useful talk — but talk nonetheless.

  

© 2022 by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Joe Biden
Conflict Resolution and U.S. Foreign Policy | Commentary

Biden Foreign Policy at 18 Months

Read More
Topographic map of Middle East
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Conflict Resolution and U.S. Foreign Policy | Policy Brief

Key Challenges for U.S. Policy in the Middle East

Read More
Barbed wire between Israel, Jerusalem
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Conflict Resolution and U.S. Foreign Policy | Report

The Israeli-Palestinian Case: Current Prospects and Continued Importance of the Two-State Solution

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy