Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Teen Depression
    Center for Health and Biosciences | Child Health Policy
    Tue, Jun. 06, 2023 | 4 pm - 5 pm
    Baker Briefing: America’s Youth in Crisis — How Policy Interventions Can Help See Details
    Textured flags of America and Mexico
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Mexico Forum
    Wed, Sep. 13, 2023 | 6 pm - 8:30 pm
    Center for the US and Mexico 10th Anniversary Dinner See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Podcast: Baker Briefing
      Baker Briefing is a weekly podcast that tackles the most critical foreign and domestic policy issues of the day in conversations with experts at the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      Logo for the Baker Briefing Podcast (Square)
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | International Economics | Commentary

AMLO’s Energy and Investment Policies Will Make Mexico Poor Again

August 4, 2022 | David A. Gantz
Mexican and US Currency

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Head shot of international trade fellow David Gantz
David A. Gantz
Will Clayton Fellow in Trade and International Economics
Read More

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Print This Publication

Mexican President Lopez Obrador’s investment policies, aiming to return Mexican energy law and policies to the protectionist, state-led approach of the 1960s and 1970s, seem almost certain to make Mexico’s economy — which has mostly seen expanded investment, exports and jobs since 1994 (under NAFTA and now the USMCA) — stagnant again, reverting to a time when Mexico had relatively few exports, limited foreign investment, little job creation, shoddy goods and services, and poverty for at least half of the country’s citizens.

AMLO seems to believe that broadening state control of petroleum through Pemex (the oil monopoly), electric power production and distribution under CFE (the electricity monopoly) and erosion of Mexico’s independent agencies, such as the Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE), will establish a higher level of Mexican “sovereignty.” The problem is that Pemex and CFE are generally incompetent, corrupt and incapable of overseeing the increased, dependable, reasonably priced and cleaner energy production that a healthy Mexican economy demands today. Moreover, in recent decades — at least until AMLO became president in December 2018 —many Mexican administrative agencies had achieved a reasonably high level of autonomy and competence.

Under AMLO, Pemex’s oil production remains in decline, with few to no prospects for a reversal. The very small increases in oil production are primarily due to private contracts signed before AMLO eliminated the possibility of additional private investment. Thus, new offshore oil fields, which under Mexican law were to be jointly exploited by Pemex and private foreign investors, will not be developed now that Pemex has been given full authority over them, since Pemex has neither the expertise nor the funds to commercialize them. Rather, AMLO seems fixated with gasoline production, pouring billions into his pet “Dos Bocas” refinery in his home state of Tabasco, and spending $1.5 billion to acquire full ownership of an older Shell refinery near Houston. Given the lack of profitability of gasoline production worldwide, Dos Bocas will be a white elephant well before it reaches full production in 2023.

The pending indirect expropriation in 2019 of some $12 billion to $15 billion worth of foreign- owned (principally U.S., Spanish and Italian) investments in clean energy production — a process that is still tied up in Mexican courts — means that CFE’s electricity production will continue to depend largely on Pemex’s fuel oil and on coal burning rather than windmills and solar panels. Like Pemex, CFE has neither the funds nor the expertise to venture into clean energy production. Also, according to experts, CFE’s power production will be more expensive and less dependable at a time when major industries and “cloud” services providers depend on 24/7 power. (Some such industries could legally produce their own clean energy through independent power production, but AMLO’s bureaucracy is no longer granting permits for the IPPs.)

These policies are both extremely unwise and in several instances a violation of the USMCA. AMLO’s attempts to roll back the Peña Nieto reforms of 2013 violate Article 32.11 of the USMCA, which gives the U.S. “most favored nation” or equivalent treatment for energy investments provided in other Mexican trade agreements. Since the Peña Nieto reforms are guaranteed in the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership to Mexico’s 10 CPTPP partners (including Canada), failure to afford equivalent treatment to U.S. investors in the energy sectors is a breach of the USMCA.

Mexico’s energy policies favoring fossil fuel production at the expense of clean energy are also inconsistent with Mexico’s undertakings under the Paris Accord to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Mexico. They are thus inconsistent with the USMCA’s environmental chapter 24, which calls for the parties to “promote mutually supportive trade and environmental policies and practices; promote high levels of environmental protection and effective enforcement of environmental laws; and enhance the capacities of the parties to address trade-related environmental issues, including through cooperation, in the furtherance of sustainable development.” Needless to say, AMLO’s policies are conflict with all of these objectives, even though Mexico retains like other states its sovereign right to kill or injure thousands of its citizen through its promotion of dirtier air.

If the only impact of the AMLO energy policies were to discourage new investment in the petroleum and electricity sectors, one might well say, “AMLO has only a few months more than two years remaining in his term, so the policies will not do any lasting harm.” However, this is false. To the extent that these energy policies make fuel and electric power for manufacturing and service industries dirtier, less dependable and more expensive, they will impact new investment and job creation over a much broader group of sectors. In effect, AMLO’s legacy will be to effectively cap Mexico’s ability to grow in the future.

Many enterprises now operating in Mexico, ranging from General Motors to Microsoft Mexico, have made broad commitments to carbon neutrality within the next 25-30 years. Such companies are becoming less and less interested in investing in Mexico. For example, high officials of General Motors have warned that GM will not increase its presence in Mexico as long as current energy policies are in place. Microsoft Mexico, which was scheduled to add massive “Azure” cloud computing services in Querétaro, Mexico, as soon as 2023, has reportedly put such new facilities on hold because Mexican regulatory authorities refuse to authorize Microsoft to contract with IPPs for clean energy for its facilities.

Among the most important large investments being considered for North America today are factories that produce electric vehicles and their batteries. Various auto and battery manufacturers have already committed billions of dollars for new facilities in many U.S. states (e.g., Michigan, North Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee) and at least one in Windsor, Canada. (The promise of generous U.S. federal or state subsidies, which Mexico cannot match, is also a factor.) Not a single new facility has been announced for Mexico (although a few manufacturers, such as Ford, will be producing EVs in existing facilities). These are long term investments in the EV revolution that are taking place in the auto industry world-wide. Once a new factory is created it will be maintained and expanded where originally located; it won’t suddenly be moved to Mexico if AMLO’s successor is more friendly to foreign investments.

Thus, a significant result of AMLO’s unwise policies will be to reduce foreign investment (along with exports and job creation) for 3-5 years and probably much longer, despite the fact that in 2021 Mexico was the United States’ second-largest trading partner (after Canada) with $661.2 billion in total goods traded. It was all very well for AMLO to scoff on July 20 when the U.S. and Canada requested formal consultations under USMCA’s dispute settlement chapter 31. (AMLO made light of the U.S. complaint at his morning press conference by saying “Ooh, how scary” and “nothing is going to happen.”) He is right in assuming that a decision against Mexico will probably require at least two years, and perhaps not be issued and trade sanctions applied until after he leaves office in September 2024. But he is reckless in making light of what could be an existential and long-term challenge for the Mexican economy, one which in the short- to medium-term could result in estimates ranging from $10 billion to $30 billion in investor claims and, ultimately, massive sanctions on Mexican exports to the U.S. should Mexico lose the case brought by the U.S. and ultimately fail to correct its treaty violations.

Regardless of how an arbitral panel rules on the legal issues, the Mexican economy and Mexico’s workers will be the losers. As the proceeding moves forward with widespread publicity in the U.S., many U.S. and other foreign investors will reconsider plans for investment in Mexico, and those who have already been directly affected will not wait for this state-to-state case to end before suing Mexico for violations under NAFTA chapter 11 or USMCA chapter 14. Potential new investors after all have other investment options in the U.S., Canada, Latin America or elsewhere. Win or lose the arbitration, Mexico’s general reputation at least since 1994 as a favorable destination for foreign investment (despite endemic corruption and drug violence) may eventually join the ranks of Argentina, Bolivia and Venezuela. Mexico’s proximity to the U.S. and solid work force are major advantages and will likely keep investment in the border industries stable or increasing. That being said, the government would be extremely unwise to neglect the negative impact of arbitrary policies that denigrate the rule of law and will inevitably lead to a long-term decline in investment, job creation and exports, and prevent Mexico as a middle-income country from moving its production up the value chain.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

©2022 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Latin children labor in unregulated conditions
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Podcast

Baker Briefing: How Child Labor Laws are Failing Migrant Children

Read More
Line of Hispanic immigrants waiting outside with backs to viewer.
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Policy Brief

More Humane Immigration Policies Will Reduce Migrant Trauma: A Conversation with Dr. Alfonso Mercado

Read More
justice
Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Report

Yarrington, García Luna, and Cienfuegos: Three Cases that Explain the New Judicial Relationship Between Mexico and the United States

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy