Skip to main content
Home
Home

  • People
  • Events
    Map of the Middle East
    Wed, June 10, 2026 | 5 pm - 6:45 pm
    The Middle East and US Foreign Policy: What Happens Next? See Details
    AI in Health Conference_Banner Image
    Science and Technology Policy
    Tue, Sep. 15 - Thu, Sep. 17, 2026 | 8 am - 6 pm
    AI in Health Conference See Details
    SynBio-Crop
    Science and Technology Policy
    Fri, Sep. 18, 2026 | 9 am - 5 pm
    Synthetic Biology at the Intersection of Science, Ethics, and Policy See Details
  • Podcasts
  • Research Programs
  • Research & Commentary
  • Press
  • Support
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Research
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Science and Technology Policy | Report

Vital Role of White House S&T Policy

September 12, 2016 | Neal F. Lane, Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Kenny Evans

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Neal F. Lane

Senior Fellow in Science and Technology Policy | Professor of Physics and Astronomy Emeritus

Kirstin R.W. Matthews

Fellow in Science and Technology Policy

Kenny Evans

Fellow in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

Baker InstituteScienceScience Advisor

To access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar. 

The director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) plays a central role in advising the president on the impact of science and technology on domestic and global affairs, and on federal funding of scientific research. This paper provides recommendations for the next president to consider when choosing a science advisor and establishing science and technology policy priorities. The project also offers guidance to the next science advisor for developing effective policy while serving in the White House. The recommendations are based on lessons learned from past presidential science advisors as well as feedback from more than 60 reviewers, including individuals who currently serve or have served the OSTP, the President’s Council of Advisors for Science and Technology, federal agencies, Congress or congressional staff, and nongovernmental organizations as well as policy scholars. 

The project, released on Sept. 14, 2016, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. (photo above), was funded by a grant from the Richard Lounsbery Foundation and by the Baker Institute Science and Technology Policy Program.

Click here to access the executive summary.

Click here to access a list of endorsements. 

 

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Modern Medical Research Laboratory, Young Scientists Using Microscope, Digital Tablet, Doing Sample Analysis, Talking. Diverse Team of Specialists work in Advanced Lab.
Science and Technology Policy | Commentary

Reimagining Science Education To Build Capacity for Collaboration

Read More
Server racks in computer network security server room data center, 3d rendering. Downloaded Server racks in computer network security server room data center
Science and Technology Policy | Commentary

Techno-Optimism, Techno-Pessimism, and Techno-Realism

Read More
A Doctor Wearing a Stethoscope and a Puzzle Piece Heart Pin.
Center for Health Policy | Science and Technology Policy | Working Paper

Reframing Autism: Considerations for a Biomedicine Roadmap

Read More
  • Contact Us
  • Donate Now
  • Press
  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Student Opportunities
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter
  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy