Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Prioritize Both Engineered and Natural Solutions for Effective GHG Mitigation

January 22, 2021 | Kenneth B. Medlock III, Keily Miller

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Kenneth B. Medlock III
James A. Baker, III, and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics | Senior Director, Center for Energy Studies
Keily Miller
Former Research Manager, Center for Energy Studies

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Medlock, Kenneth and Keily Miller. 2021. Prioritize Both Engineered and Natural Solutions for Effective GHG Mitigation. Policy brief: Recommendations for the New Administration. 01.22.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

This brief is part of a series of policy recommendations for the administration of President Joe Biden. Focusing on a range of important issues facing the country, the briefs are intended to provide decision-makers with relevant and effective ideas for addressing domestic and foreign policy priorities. View the entire series at www.bakerinstitute.org/recommendations-2021.

Introduction

U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions totaled approximately 6.7 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent in 2018. Of that amount, CO2 accounted for 81%, followed by methane (10%), nitrous oxide (7%), and fluorinated gases (3%). Non-CO2 GHGs can be abated through measures that pose minimal threat to economic development.1 So, those pathways should be fully explored. However, efforts to address climate change in the U.S. and abroad typically focus on mitigation of CO2 due to its prevalence in the GHG portfolio. The vast majority of CO2 emissions result from direct combustion of fossil fuels. Two sectors that are among the hardest to abate—transportation and industry—together account for over half of total energy-related CO2 emissions.

The challenge of addressing the atmospheric accumulation of CO2 will require a multitude of solutions. A comprehensive national strategy aimed at decarbonization should include both engineered and natural pathways for removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Focusing on net (rather than gross) emissions expands the portfolio of potential options to include various CO2 mitigation options. The U.S. has a very specific comparative advantage in both engineered and natural carbon sinks, as it has tremendous technical depth, entrepreneurial talent, a rich geologic endowment, and lots of land dedicated to multiple types of uses.

Nature-Based Solutions

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that natural sinks in the U.S.—the country’s forests, wetlands, and prairies— removed almost 800 million tons of CO2 from the atmosphere in 2018, or about 12% of total U.S. emissions.2 According to some estimates, nature-based carbon sequestration could account for 37% of the global emission reduction goals set forth in the Paris climate accords.3 Other studies indicate that natural climate solutions have a global total potential absorptive capacity of 23.8 gigatons (Gt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) per year.4 Global emissions stand at roughly 34 Gt of CO2e per year,5 so realization of the full potential of the natural system could be a powerful force.

Nature-based solutions also present a suite of potential co-benefits in addition to removing CO2 from the atmosphere, ranging from economic stimulus for rural areas through enhanced agricultural sector productivity to improvement in local environmental quality and resilience. The U.S. can take the lead in advancing nature-based solutions for greater carbon uptake. With appropriate financial incentives, a large fraction of U.S. lands could become a significant part of the climate solution, while at the same time generating economic value in rural communities:

  • Incentivize landowners to voluntarily participate in developing a baseline measurement of carbon in natural sinks. Measurement and verification are vital for the success of any natural solution. Establishing a verifiable baseline measurement so that ecosystem carbon flux can be characterized is important for the development of any nature-based carbon solution.
     
  • Dedicate more funding for research and development of carbon flux measurement. Accurate characterization of how land use changes and soil amendments alter carbon uptake through natural systems is critical, but such a process has never been commercialized. R&D efforts into rapid measurement of carbon flux could trigger sizeable investment in natural solutions.
     
  • Support pricing mechanisms that incentivize the enhancement of natural sinks through land management techniques and soil amendments. To the extent that co-benefits such as increased soil fertility, drought resistance, and other ecological services are realized, land use activities incentivized through a market for natural solutions, such as soil carbon storage, can enhance the overall value of agricultural activities. The U.S. is the largest exporter of agricultural commodities to the world, so any co-benefits will enhance the global impact of U.S. agriculture.
     
  • Create a central clearing-house or regulatory agency that establishes a minimum requirement for certifying natural carbon sinks. This would allow individual states to apply for regulatory authority over carbon markets that involve nature-based solutions within their borders. The potential to store carbon in soils depends on the type of land as well, with variance in mitigation potential between forests, agriculture and grasslands, and wetlands. Given that the agricultural footprint of each state varies, this would allow each state to oversee carbon storage certification that is most appropriate.
     
  • Incentivize soil amendments, like biochar, that are known to mitigate non-CO2 GHGs in agriculture and provide several other co-benefits. Soil amendments like biochar increase water-holding capacity, improve soil health, and enhance nitrogen (N) uptake. This improves crop resilience and mitigates negative environmental externalities associated with nitrous oxide (N2O, a potent GHG associated with agriculture and the application of nitrogenous fertilizers) and N runoff (a problem that stimulates algal blooms that contribute to the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico).

Engineered Solutions

Efforts are underway to expand engineering-directed efforts to capture CO2 emissions and either inject them into a subsurface formation, such as a saline aquifer, or utilize them in other processes. The massive scale of existing global energy infrastructure presents a legacy that make such approaches particularly effective. A growing body of literature continues to emphasize the important role that carbon capture technologies must play if certain carbon mitigation strategies are to be met. Work by organizations such as the International Energy Agency6 note that the suite of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies is unique because it “contributes both to reducing emissions in key sectors directly and to removing CO2 to balance emissions that are challenging to avoid—a critical part of ‘net’ zero goals.”

Over the past decade, strong policy frameworks and incentives have played a central role in advancing renewable energy value chains associated with wind and solar power. Similarly, policy can play a central role in expanding carbon capture technologies. Commercial incentive can be derived from a number of factors, including investor-driven environmental, social, and governance (ESG) constraints on access to capital, fiscal policy support, a carbon tax, or market-oriented activities that explicitly price CO2. Supportive policy and regulatory and commercial frameworks will underpin CCUS value chain development in the U.S.

  • Make permanent the 45Q tax credit. Abating CO2 emissions is not a goal that will disappear in 2026. The 45Q tax credit per ton of captured CO2 is immensely helpful. However, the recent extension for start of construction to January 2026 to qualify still puts many potential projects at risk. A number of states are taking steps to clear legal and regulatory hurdles for CCUS investment, but work remains to be done at state and local levels where the infrastructure will be deployed. Federal legislators, therefore, are encouraged to support making the 45Q tax credit permanent, or at least extend the date further, so that any state and local impediments can be addressed. The tax credit conveys a commercial benefit to developers along the CCUS value chain, and could trigger broader use of tax equity finance measures for CCUS similar to those deployed in the financing of large-scale wind generation projects.
     
  • Increase appropriations to the Department of Energy for advanced carbon initiatives. Robust R&D activities are broadly viewed as critical to the long-term health of any industry. An expanded R&D portfolio focused on the efficiency of existing CCUS technologies, new hydrocarbon combustion processes, hydrogen produced from hydrocarbon feedstocks, new carbon-based materials, and new uses of CO2 in industrial and power generation activities can play a major role in achieving desired economic and environmental outcomes.
     
  • Allow the leasing of federal acreage for CO2 storage. By expanding access to suitable geologic sequestration sites, the U.S. government can play an important facilitating role in expanding the deployment of carbon capture technologies. In addition, the leasing of pore space for permanent CO2 storage will provide a source of additional revenue for the federal government.
     
  • Streamline permitting for CCUS projects. This includes permitting pipelines that cross state boundaries; moving CO2 from onshore capture locations to offshore injection sites; and streamlining the evaluation of environmental impacts of new infrastructure siting to comply with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements.

Endnotes

1. J. Reilly, M. Sarofim, S. Paltsev, and R.G. Prinn, “The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate policy: Analysis using the MIT IGSM,” Energy Journal, MultiGreenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue #3, (2006): 503–520, http://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ journal.aspx.

2. Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks Fast Facts and Data Highlights, April 2020, https://www.epa.gov/sites/ production/files/2020-04/documents/ fastfacts-1990-2018.pdf.

3. See “Nature-based Solutions,” International Union for Conservation of Nature, https://www.iucn.org/theme/ nature-based-solutions.

4. See Bronson W. Griscom et al., “Natural Climate Solutions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, no. 44 (October 31, 2017): 11645–11650, https:// www.pnas.org/content/114/44/11645. Also see D.A. Bossio et al., “The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions,” Nature Sustainability 3 (May 2020), https://doi. org/10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z.

5. See “Global Emissions,” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, https://www.c2es. org/content/international-emissions/.

6. See International Energy Agency, CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions, September 2020, https://www.iea.org/reports/ccusin-clean-energy-transitions.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/SGDV-1557
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
Gas+Stove
Center for Energy Studies | Commentary

Why Gas Stoves Matter to the Climate — and the Gas Industry: Keeping Them Means Homes Will Use Gas for Heating Too

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy