Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    China flag with binary code overlay texture
    China Studies
    Mon, Jan. 30, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Sovereignty See Details
    The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Roundtable
      Join the Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s premier membership forum, which offers unique opportunities to engage with fellows and policy-minded peers.
      Read More
      RT
    • Join the Roundtable Young Professionals
      Join the RT Young Professionals
      If you're interested in major political and public policy issues, and want the opportunity to network with industry leaders and your peers, then our young professionals organization is for you.
      Read More
      RYP Baker
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Health and Biosciences | Research Paper

The Association Between New COVID-19 Cases and Google Searches for Mental Health

June 10, 2020 | Patrick S. Tennant, Quianta Moore, Jennifer Gonzalez, Melissa Rowan, Catie Hilbelink
A woman sits on the floor while looking down.

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Patrick S. Tennant
Former Researcher, Center for Health and Biosciences, Baker Institute
Quianta Moore
Nonresident Fellow in Child Health Policy | Executive Director, The Hackett Center for Mental Health
Jennifer Gonzalez
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute
Melissa Rowan
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute
Catie Hilbelink
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication

Tags

pandemic

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention projected a substantial increase in COVID-19 mortality (CDC, 2020) across the United States in May 2020. New data suggest that many Americans are feeling distressed by the rising number of COVID-19 cases in their state (Panchal et al., 2020). This collective uncertainty is unlikely to decline given the spread of disease, expanded “shelter in place” orders in many jurisdictions, and the removal of social isolation restrictions in some localities that may lead to repeated waves of infection. The widespread impact of COVID-19 has led to job layoffs or furloughing in a variety of industries, which exacerbates stressors for families across the U.S. (Panchal et al., 2020).

We analyzed Google trends data in an attempt to detect changes in population mental health associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases. Our analyses revealed a positive association between the number of new COVID-19 cases reported and mental health related Google searches. That is, there were more mental health searches on Google in a given state on days when more new cases of COVID-19 were announced in that state. This finding suggests an association between mental health related thoughts (measured through Google searches) and reports of new cases.

Measuring mental health through Google searches is not equivalent to tallying clinical diagnoses, but search trends have been used to capture health care trends (Nuti et al., 2014), population mental health (Soreni et al., 2019), COVID-19 symptoms (Stephens-Davidowitz, 2020) and Zika epidemics (Teng et al., 2017), among other phenomena. Traditional population-based measures often have a multi-year lag time in releasing prevalence and treatment-seeking rates for critical health-related indicators, such as mental illness and substance use (both of which are expected to increase due to COVID-19 (Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, 2020)). Therefore, high quality measures of the impact of COVID-19 on our mental health may not be fully clear for years. At this point, even a rough measure of population mental health is important to assess so that we can project where the need for mental health services may lie as the pandemic continues. We attempted to remedy this problem using some of the most contemporary data available to demonstrate how the increasing number of COVID-19 cases is associated with population mental health.

We used state-level data from the New York Times COVID Cases database (The New York Times, n.d.) and Google Search Trends (Google Trends, n.d.) to measure the number of new COVID-19 cases per day and Google searches for mental health key words, respectively. Our data represents daily new COVID-19 cases and Google searches at the state level from March 11 to April 11, 2020. We calculated the number of new COVID-19 cases per day (new cases) as the number of total cases reported for each state minus the number of cases reported from the prior day. We then conducted a natural log transformation of new cases because the distribution was highly variable and commonly grew exponentially over time.

Google search trends (obtained from the gtrendsR package (Massicotte & Eddelbuettel, 2019)) were scaled to reflect the relative popularity of a given search term within the state over the queried time period (in this case, 30 days). Values represent a percentage of search volume relative to the highest search volume day, ranging from 100 (i.e., the day with the most searches) to possible low of 0. This score, called the Relative Search Value (or RSV), was calculated for a composite measure called mental health searches, which included independent RSV scores for the search terms “depression”, “anxiety”, “suicide”, and “mental health” in each of the 50 states over the month. The composite of mental health searches was comprised of the average RSV for all search terms on a given state-day.

A multi-level regression model was fit to assess the magnitude of the within-state association between new cases and mental health searches after accounting for date and weekly fluctuations (because mental health searches occur less commonly on weekends). Our results identified a significant association between new cases and mental health searches, such that a 10% increase in the number of new cases in a state would, on average, result in a 0.17-point increase in RSV of mental health searches in that state. There was also meaningful variation in the effect between states (Figure 1 depicts this variation and full model results are provided in the Appendix).

Figure 1 — Mental Health Google Search Trends by New COVID-19 Cases Each Day From March 11 to April 11 for Select States

This graph compares trends in mental health Google searches and new COVID-19 cases for select states.

Given patterns of viral transmission and fluctuating testing capacity, our data also include substantial variation in the number of new cases reported on any given day, and thus predicted increases in mental health searches can also be considerable. Fifteen states experienced at least one sampled day with 500% day over day growth in new cases. On those days, our model would predict the RSV for mental health searches to increase by about 3.2 points, meaning potentially thousands more Google searches related to mental health.

We believe these findings could be used by policy makers to encourage utilization of mental health services that are already increasingly available given the federal, state and local responses to COVID-19. Because both state and federal governments have moved quickly to deploy resources, lift restrictions, and change regulatory policy, access to telehealth services has increased. Still, despite reports of increases in demand for tele-mental health services (Robbins, 2020), access to such services is not evenly distributed and many who could benefit do not have access. The people at greatest risk of mental illness—those with a history of adversity, such as trauma or abuse, or who are socioeconomically disadvantaged—may lack the resources (e.g., smart phones with unlimited service plans and cameras) to support telemedicine appointments with a provider. Some steps have been taken to account for the diversity in individual circumstance, but there is more to be done, such as allowing reimbursement for audio-only telehealth services, to continue increasing access, availability, and advertisement of mental health services.

Policy makers should prepare for increased mental health needs in case proposed scenarios of a continued increase of COVID-19 cases, or a resurgence of infections, becomes a reality. That may include continuing to remove regulatory barriers to treatment or insuring adequate reimbursement rates for a variety of levels and types of mental health professional licenses. Though the specific changes needed will vary between states, all levels of government should take steps to make mental health treatment available to everyone as society copes with COVID-19.

References

CDC. (2020, February 11). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/forecastingus.html.

Google Trends. (n.d.). Google Trends. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=US.

Lorah, J. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2.

Massicotte, P., & Eddelbuettel, D. (2019). Package ‘gtrendsR.’ https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/gtrendsR/gtrendsR.pdf.

Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute. (2020). Projected COVID-19 MHSUD Impacts, Volume 1: Effects of COVID-Induced Economic Recession (COVID Recession) (pp. 22–31). https://www.texasstateofmind.org/uploads/whitepapers/COVIDMHSUDImpacts.pdf.

Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014). The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583.

Panchal, N., Kamal, R., Orgera, K., Muñana, C., Apr 21, P. C. P., & 2020. (2020, April 21). The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/the-implications-ofcovid-19-for-mental-health-and-substance-use/.

Robbins, R. (2020, April 13). Will the coronavirus be a breakout moment for virtual mental health care? STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/13/remote-mental-health-livongo-omada/.

Soreni, N., Cameron, D. H., Streiner, D. L., Rowa, K., & McCabe, R. E. (2019). Seasonality Patterns of Internet Searches on Mental Health: Exploratory Infodemiology Study. JMIR Mental Health, 6(4), e12974. https://doi.org/10.2196/12974.

Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2020, April 5). Google Searches Can Help Us Find Emerging Covid- 19 Outbreaks. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/opinion/coronavirus-google-searches.html.

Teng, Y., Bi, D., Xie, G., Jin, Y., Huang, Y., Lin, B., An, X., Feng, D., & Tong, Y. (2017). Dynamic Forecasting of Zika Epidemics Using Google Trends. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0165085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165085.

The New York Times. (n.d.). Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count. New York Times. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html.

Appendix

Table 1 — Level 1 Results of Multi-Level Regression Model Examining the Effect of New COVID-19 Cases on Mental Health Searches

This table shows the statistic results of the effect of new COVID-19 cases on mental health searches.
Note  Associations that are statistically significant (p < .05) are
denoted in bold font.

Table 2 — Random Intercepts and Slopes for Each State From Multi-Level Regression Model Examining the Effect of New COVID-19 Cases on Mental Health Searches

This table lists intercepts and slopes for states Alabama–Rhode Island.
This table lists intercepts and slopes for states South Carolina–Wyoming.
Note  Calculating and reporting standard errors, statistical significance,
and effect sizes for random slopes is complex and a field-wide consensus
on best practice is lacking (Lorah, 2018), so no measure or indication of
significance is included in Table 2. Still, relative state-level variation in
intercepts and slopes may be of interest to some readers and so intercepts
and coefficients are reported here.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

Kidney imaging
Center for Health and Biosciences | Journal

Fifty Years of a National Program for the Treatment of Kidney Failure

Read More
Solider sitting in folding chair
Center for Health and Biosciences | Domestic Health Policy Analysis | Newsletter

Should Health Care Providers Ask Their Regular Patients About Their Sexual Health?

Read More
RX Medicine
Center for Health and Biosciences | Domestic Health Policy Analysis | Commentary

How Mark Cuban's Prescription Drug Disruption Could Save Lives

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy