Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Centers & Programs
    • Centers
      • Center for Energy Studies
      • Center for Health and Biosciences
      • Center for the Middle East
      • Center for Public Finance
      • Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      • McNair Center
      Center for Energy Studies
      Providing new insights on the role of economics, policy and regulation in the performance and evolution of energy markets.
      More Details
      The globe at night, lights in populated areas illuminated
      Center for Health and Biosciences
      Advancing data-based policies that promote health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.
      More Details
      Female healthcare worker lifts finger to press digital buttons featuring topical iconography
      Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
      Developing pragmatic policy approaches to the region’s enduring political, economic and societal concerns.
      More Details
      Topographic map of Middle East
      Center for Public Finance
      Delivering research and analysis on the effects of major U.S. fiscal policies.
      More Details
      Stack of coins with mathematical figure overlays
      Center for the U.S. and Mexico
      Strengthening the binational relationship by addressing major concerns on both sides of the border.
      More Details
      Textured flags of America and Mexico
      McNair Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
      Providing actionable policy analysis and recommendations that aim to expand the economy through private enterprise.
      More Details
      Professionals gather around a large table with laptops, printed documents and coffee cups for a business meeting
    • Programs
      • China Studies
      • Drug Policy
      • International Economics
      • Presidential Elections
      • Religion & Public Policy
      • Science & Technology Policy
      • Space Policy
      China Studies
      Analyzing the influence of the transnational circulation of people, technologies, commodities and ideas in China.
      Read More
      Person walks alongside large banner with Chinese characters
      Drug Policy
      Pursuing research and open debate to develop pragmatic drug policies based on common sense and driven by human rights interests.
      Read More
      Marijuana
      International Economics
      Studying timely issues in global economic policy as well as developmental policy in foreign countries.
      Read More
      International paper currencies stacked together, showing range of colors and styles
      Presidential Elections
      Offering nonpartisan analysis of elections to better understand the changing dynamics of presidential campaigns.
      Read More
      An assortment of campaign buttons from a variety of US elections and political pursuits are displayed in a collage
      Religion and Public Policy
      Exploring how religion and cultural factors interact with public policy issues.
      Read More
      A worn path stretches between rows of olive trees
      Science and Technology Policy
      Addressing a broad range of policy issues that affect scientists and their research.
      Read More
      A scientist picks up test tubes from a rack.
      Space Policy
      Focusing on U.S. space policy and the future of space travel.
      Read More
      The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at sunrise
  • Events
    Child at border plays in the dirt with superhero toy
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico
    Thu, Feb. 23, 2023 | 5 pm - 7:30 pm
    Immigration Reform and the Impact on Children: A Town Hall Discussion See Details
    Tile mosaic over an entrance to Baker Hall that reads "A Bridge Between the World of Ideas and the World of Action"
    Center for the U.S. and Mexico | Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East
    Wed, Mar. 15, 2023 | 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
    Charting Paths Forward on Immigration Reform See Details
  • Experts
    • Biomedical Research
    • Child Health
    • China
    • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East
    • Domestic Health Policy
    • Drug Policy
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
    • Global Health
    • Health and Biosciences
    • Human Rights and Refugees
    • International Economics
    • Islam and Politics
    • Latin American Energy
    • Middle East
    • Political Economy of the Arab Gulf
    • Presidential Elections
    • Public Finance
    • Religion and Public Policy
    • Science and Technology
    • Space Policy
    • Texas Politics
    • U.S. and Iran
    • U.S. and Mexico
    • See All Experts
    • Experts in the News
  • Support
    • Join the Baker Roundtable
      Join the Baker Roundtable
      Learn more about the Baker Institute’s membership forum, which supports the mission of the institute and offers members exclusive access to experts and events.
      Read More
      RT
    • Major Gifts
      Major Gifts
      Major gifts provide the funds necessary for the Baker Institute to explore new areas of study and research, and expand current programs.
      Read More
      Wallace S. Wilson meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
    • Endowments
      Endowments
      Endowment gifts provide the Baker Institute with permanent resources that support research programs, fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Pictured from left are William Martin, Katharine Neill Harris, Ambassador Edward Djerejian, Alfred C. Glassell, III, and Pam Lindberg
    • Planned Giving
      Planned Giving

      Plan a gift that will ensure lasting, meaningful support for policy programs important to you.

       

      Read More
      meeting
    • Corporate Support
      Corporate Support
      Corporations can become involved with the institute in a number of ways and see the benefit from the research conducted by our fellows and scholars.
      Read More
      Wide shot of the Doré Commons during a Shell Distinguished Lecture Series event featuring Wim Thomas
  • About
    • People
      People
      Learn more about the Baker Institute's leadership and get contact information for the administrative staff.
      Read More
      Secretary James A. Baker, III, stands with a portion of the Berlin Wall, outside of Baker Hall
    • Student Opportunities
      Student Opportunities
      Through the internships on campus and beyond, Rice students can explore careers in public policy, or simply become better informed about important issues of the day.
      Read More
      Amb. Edward P. Djerejian speaks with students outside Baker Hall
    • Annual Report
    • Blog
    • Contact
      Contact Us
      Complete a form for event, media or other inquiries, and get directions and parking information for the Baker Institute.
      Read More
      The front of Baker Hall, from across the plaza, with fountain in foreground
  • Contact
  • Research
    • Economics & Finance
      Economics & Finance
      Read More
    • Energy
      Latest Energy Research
      Summary on Latest Energy Research
      Read More
    • Foreign Policy
      Foreign Policy
      Read More
    • Domestic Policy
      Domestic Policy
      Read More
    • Health & Science
      Health & Science
      Read More
    • All Publications
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Economics & Finance
  • Energy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Domestic Policy
  • Health & Science
  • All Publications
Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Climate Policy in 2021: An Opportunity for Bipartisan Action

January 20, 2021 | Jim Krane, Kenneth B. Medlock III, Mark Finley, Michael D. Maher
Solar panels and wind turbines

Table of Contents

Author(s)

Jim Krane
Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies
Kenneth B. Medlock III
James A. Baker, III, and Susan G. Baker Fellow in Energy and Resource Economics | Senior Director, Center for Energy Studies
Mark Finley
Fellow in Energy and Global Oil
Michael D. Maher
Senior Program Advisor

Share this Publication

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Linkedin
  • Download PDF
  • Print This Publication
  • Cite This Publication

    Krane, Jim, Kenneth B. Medlock, III, Mark Finley, and Michael D. Maher. 2021. Climate Policy in 2021: An Opportunity for Bipartisan Action. Policy brief: Recommendations for the New Administration. 01.20.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas.

    Copy Citation

This brief is part of a series of policy recommendations for the administration of President Joe Biden. Focusing on a range of important issues facing the country, the briefs are intended to provide decision-makers with relevant and effective ideas for addressing domestic and foreign policy priorities. View the entire series at www.bakerinstitute.org/recommendations-2021.

Climate action offers a ripe opportunity for a closely divided federal government to negotiate robust bipartisan energy and environmental policy. The private sector is already moving to embrace environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agendas, with net-zero goals being announced across the energy landscape and beyond. A bipartisan legislative push that provides regulatory certainty for investors could lay the groundwork for significant progress on climate. The best-case scenario would see a roster of complimentary efforts led by Democratic majorities in the House and Senate working with Republican colleagues for broad constituent benefits. Done right, bipartisan cooperation could morph into comprehensive climate-focused legislation on the scale of the Clean Air Act.

President-elect Joe Biden made campaign pledges to strive for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and a carbon-free electric power sector by 2035. These goals hinge upon support for renewables, upgraded electric transmission infrastructure, greater electrification and increased efficiency in different sectors, and increased research and development (R&D) funding for national labs and research universities.1 All of this would be accompanied by the continued decline of fossil fuel employment led by dwindling coal use in power generation, with federal support for miners and oil industry workers and their communities.2

Not all of the items in Biden’s plan will be supported across the aisle, or indeed, among all Democrats. But since the end goal is a net reduction in carbon emissions, it can be achieved along multiple paths. Recognizing this point offers potential for substantial gains. Indeed, several legislative pathways already have varying degrees of bipartisan support and each would play a role in reducing emissions. Many of these measures already appear in different forms of draft legislation and include incentives for carbon capture technologies, expanding R&D, creating more resilient renewable energy supply chains, increasing the use of nature-based solutions, and addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions other than CO2 (methane, nitrous oxides, and fluoride gases).

Of course, the Biden administration and its congressional allies can pursue some goals without the support of the substantial Republican minority. This would be unfortunate, however, because the president would be left to pursue a truncated climate agenda that would ultimately be less effective and durable, since it would engender active opposition within Republican-led states.

In reality, climate policies should not be a battleground. The fact that coal-state Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) is in a position to chair the Senate Energy Committee suggests the likelihood for a nuanced and complimentary approach. As the 2015 lifting of the U.S. ban on crude oil exports shows, compromise is possible.3 Bipartisan climate policy can succeed if parties recognize merit in the myriad ways to reduce GHG emissions. Below, we present proposals that would fit such a bipartisan approach to carbon neutrality.

Bipartisan Climate Action Proposals

1. Prioritize the retention of the existing U.S. nuclear power fleet and aggressively support advanced reactor designs and modular technologies.

The beleaguered nuclear power sector, the only dispatchable source of zero-carbon base-load power, requires immediate help to retain plants nearing the end of their operational lives. Nuclear power is currently too costly to be a favored low-carbon choice for new construction, but existing plants are a very low-cost source of carbon-free power. Advanced reactor designs and modular technologies hold promise for a lower-cost future for nuclear power, and they could be paired with battery storage to maximize capacity utilization.4 With support from the Biden administration, a bipartisan Senate bill, such as the American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2020, could make a difference.5

2. Advance fiscal support for multiple low-carbon options.

It may be possible to capture an easy bipartisan win by pairing continued incentives for carbon capture with new incentives for wind, solar, and utility-scale batteries. For example, extensions of the production tax credit for wind (expiring at the end of 2021)6 and the investment tax credit for solar (reduced to 10% for commercial projects and phasing out by 2023 for residential projects)7 can be complemented by expanding the 45Q tax credit for carbon capture. Further incentivizing offshore wind—including in the Gulf of Mexico where oil companies already operate—could also pay dividends for the 2035 goal of decarbonizing the power sector. And, given the importance of carbon capture technologies for decarbonizing industries that have few non-fossil options for process heat, such a suite of incentives could prove very effective.8 Moreover, legislative support is already bipartisan.9

3. Address non-CO2 greenhouse gases by explicitly regulating their reduction.

Non-CO2 GHGs accounted for about 20% of all GHG emissions in the U.S. in 2018. These gases include methane (10%), nitrous oxides (7%), and fluorinated gases (3%). While the sources of these GHGs are varied, with a few exceptions, their mitigation costs are low in comparison to CO2. Existing technologies can be deployed to address significant sources of each.

4. Expand existing U.S. Department of Energy programs to support demonstration of industrial scale hydrogen.

Hydrogen has significant potential as an energy source. A market for hydrogen already exists for various industrial, refining, and chemical applications. But expanding the market to new uses—including energy storage—requires the creation of new color-coded value chains that can be supported by federal policy. Hydrogen is currently produced through steam methane reformation (so-called grey hydrogen), which results in CO2 emissions. Capturing the emissions in the process results in carbon-free hydrogen (blue H2). It is also possible to produce carbon-free hydrogen using electrolysis powered by renewables and biochemical conversion of algae (green H2). Finally, there are other colors in the evolving hydrogen palette (yellow for biomass and turquoise for methane pyrolysis), and each, except grey, employs methods to eliminate CO2. Each of these technologies is at a different maturity level. Demonstration at scale is required to push all to commercial reality.

5. Support legislation to reward ecosystem services and advance nature-based solutions for carbon sequestration.

Natural solutions utilize photosynthesis, nature’s own carbon sequestration technology, to provide potentially huge levels of carbon removal at low cost. These include enhancing natural carbon sinks through forestry, land management practices, and through the use of soil amendments.10 The bipartisan Growing Climate Solutions Act, introduced in June 2020, would help farmers and other landowners monetize carbon storage capacity on their lands.11

6. Reintroduce a phased commitment to improve energy efficiency standards in transportation and building codes.

Efficiency is a virtual source of supply and is proven to reduce environmental impacts of energy services in all economic sectors. Efficiency standards in the automotive sector will advance efforts to achieve net carbon neutrality in transportation, and augmenting building efficiencies through weatherization programs and smart technologies might prove a reasonable part of a bipartisan climate bill.12

7. Fund the development of energy transportation infrastructures, such as transmission lines and hydrogen and CO2 pipelines.

Transmission capabilities are vital to the development of product value chains. If transmission cannot be developed, investment both upstream and downstream of a pipeline or wire will not be forthcoming.

8. Make a long-term commitment to expanded research and development of carbon-neutral (or carbon-negative) technologies.

R&D plays a vital role for all industries. A bipartisan mandate to expand appropriation to the U.S. Department of Energy’s various national laboratories, as well as support for energy-related work at research universities, can pave the way for long-term sustained innovation that is necessary to advance carbon-neutral goals in a commercially sustainable way.

9. Seek legislative approaches to explicitly price CO2.

Transparent and predictable carbon pricing would level the playing field for competition among fuels, technologies, and approaches (i.e., carbon offsets vs. clean energy supplies vs. efficiency standards). A carbon price would steer investment and consumption toward lower-carbon energy sources. Carbon revenues could either be rebated to households or, perhaps, used to provide a social safety net for economic victims of climate policy. Several relevant bills have been introduced: the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (with 82 co-sponsors, all but one who were Democrats),13 the bipartisan Stemming Warming and Augmenting Pay (SWAP) Act,14 and the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019.15

Conclusion

The outcome of the 2020 elections provides a real opportunity to create durable climate policy. Many of the clean energy options typically identified with Democrats are most prominent in Republican-dominated parts of the country (see Figure 1). Installed operating wind capacity as of July 2020 in the U.S. was 108,648 megawatts (MW). In states that voted for Donald Trump, the total was 71,570 MW compared with 37,078 MW in those that voted for Biden.16 While Figure 1 does not correct for the amount of land for siting and available wind resources across each state, it shows that support for wind generation is agnostic to political orientation. We believe support for climate action can be similarly crafted, for more universal appeal. So, while a Democrat-led but closely divided Congress could obstruct some climate ambitions unveiled in Biden’s campaign, there are enough potential pathways for major GHG reductions that should receive backing from both sides of the political divide.

Figure 1 — Installed Operating Wind Capacity By State (July 2020)

FIGURE 1 — INSTALLED OPERATING WIND CAPACITY BY STATE (JULY 2020)
Source  Energy Information Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory, November 24, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860M/.

 

Endnotes

1. “The Biden Plan to Build a Modern, Sustainable Infrastructure and an Equitable Clean Energy Future,” August 5, 2020, https://joebiden.com/clean-energy/.

2. “The Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice,” October 29, 2020, https://joebiden.com/ climate-plan/.

3. Witness bipartisan support in 2015 for rolling back the U.S. ban on crude oil exports in exchange for wind and solar tax breaks. Billy House and Erik Wasson, “Congress Passes U.S. Spending Bill to End Oil Export Ban,” Bloomberg, December 18, 2015, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/ articles/2015-12-18/house-passes-u-sspending-bill-that-ends-crude-oil-exportban.

4. Peter R. Hartley, “The Cost of Displacing Fossil Fuels: Some Evidence from Texas,” Baker Institute for Public Policy, Working Paper, 2017, https://www. bakerinstitute.org/files/12300/.

5. American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2020, S. 4897, 116th Cong. (2020), https:// www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/ senate-bill/4897.

6. Katherine Gillespie et al., “Congress Extends Renewable Energy Tax Credits in 2021 Omnibus Spending Bill,” JDSupra Energy Law Blog, December 23, 2020; https://www. jdsupra.com/legalnews/congress-extendsrenewable-energy-tax-98223/.

7. Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 § 48C, Qualifying Advanced Energy Project Credit, 2013, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ text/26/48C.

8. Kenneth B. Medlock, III and Keily Miller, Carbon Capture in Texas: Comparative Advantage in a Low Carbon Portfolio, Baker Institute for Public Policy, June, 2020, https:// www.bakerinstitute.org/research/carboncapture-texas-comparative-advantagelow-carbon-portfolio/.

9. Launching Energy Advancement and Development through Innovations for Natural Gas Act of 2019, S. 1685, 116th Cong. (2019) https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1685; Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Innovation Act, H.R. 5865, 116th Cong. (2020) https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5865/ text; The New Energy Frontiers Through Carbon Innovation Act, H.R. 5864, 116th Cong. (2020) https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5864/text.

10. Jim Blackburn and Kenneth B. Medlock, III, BCARBON: A new soil carbon storage standard, Baker Institute for Public Policy, October 2020, https://www. bakerinstitute.org/files/16587/.

11. Growing Climate Solutions Act of 2020, H.R. 7393, 116th Cong. (2020) https:// www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/ house-bill/7393.

12. Katie Fehrenbacher, “BMW, Ford, other automakers rev up carbon commitments,” GreenBiz, July 29, 2020, https://www.greenbiz.com/article/bmwford-other-automakers-rev-carboncommitments.

13. Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, H.R. 763, 116th Cong. (2019) https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763.

14. SWAP Act, H.R. 4058, 116th Cong. (2019) https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4058.

15. Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019, H.R. 4051, 116th Cong. (2019) https://www. congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/housebill/4051.

16. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis, 2019, https://www.eia.gov/ electricity/data/state/.

 

 

This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy
https://doi.org/10.25613/WP22-3627 
  • Print This Publication
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Linkedin

Related Research

PVC Pipes
Center for Energy Studies | Research Paper

Why Classifying PVC as Hazardous Waste Undermines America's Zero-Waste and Energy Transition Goals

Read More
Hydrogen
Center for Energy Studies | Working Paper

Developing a Robust Hydrogen Market in Texas

Read More
ME Map
Edward P. Djerejian Center for the Middle East | Center for Energy Studies | Policy Brief

Building Water and Energy Security in the GCC through an Integrated Policy Approach

Read More
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Donate Now
  • Media Inquiries
  • Membership
  • About the Institute
  • Rice.edu
Contact Us

6100 Main Street
Baker Hall MS-40, Suite 120
Houston, TX 77005

Email: bipp@rice.edu
Phone: 713-348-4683
Fax: 713-348-5993

Baker Institute Newsletter

The email newsletter of Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy provides a snapshot of institute news, research and upcoming events.

Sign Up

  • © Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy
  • Web Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy