In an Oct. 15, 2012, Baker Institute policy report, Kirstin Matthews, fellow in science and technology policy; Brent Carey, graduate intern; Kenneth Evans, graduate intern; and Padraig Moloney, Ph.D., graduate intern, examine the challenges NASA has faced in funding science research. Using nanotechnology as a case study, the authors describe the agency's lack of continuity and long-term strategic planning in research and development (R&D) -- and assert NASA's future could lie in focused R&D of new technologies.
Setting specific objectives for basic research and aligning the objectives with a nationally recognized plan for space exploration could help to stabilize congressional appropriations for NASA in the long-term, they write. At home, reinvesting in basic sciences could help find a new role for the Johnson Space Center after the termination of the shuttle program.
Kenneth B. Medlock III , Mark Finley
Jan 14 2021 | Center for Energy Studies
David R. Brockman
Jan 12 2021 | Religion & Public Policy