The Costs and Benefits of Immigration Enforcement
Table of Contents
Author(s)
Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda
Associate Professor, Chicana and Chicano Studies, and Director, NAID Center, Naval Postgraduate SchoolTo access the full paper, download the PDF on the left-hand sidebar.
Abstract
For more than two decades, the U.S. government has attempted to put a stop to unauthorized immigration from (and through) Mexico by implementing "enforcement-only" measures along the U.S.-Mexico border and at work sites throughout the country. These measures have not only failed to end unauthorized immigration, but have placed downward pressure on wages in a broad swath of industries. In recent decades, the U.S. government's avoidance of immigration reform and dependence upon enforcement-only approaches to immigration has served only to deepen a vicious cycle of underground labor markets, lower wages, lower consumption, lower tax revenue, and reduced productivity. Were the government to end this failed enforcement-only crusade and create a pathway to legal status for unauthorized immigrants in the United States, as well as new legal limits on immigration that respond to market forces, it would raise the social floor for the entire U.S. economy—to the benefit of both immigrant and native-born workers.
This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The views expressed herein are those of the individual author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.